• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于医疗替代决策的公众认知、偏好和经历:一项全国性横断面调查。

Public knowledge, preferences and experiences about medical substitute decision-making: a national cross-sectional survey.

作者信息

Sellars Marcus, Tran Julien, Nolte Linda, White Ben, Sinclair Craig, Fetherstonhaugh Deirdre, Detering Karen

机构信息

Department of Health Services Research & Policy, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

Advance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021 Mar 15. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002619.

DOI:10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002619
PMID:33722813
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the Australian adult public's knowledge and experiences regarding substitute decision-making for medical decisions and their preferences for obtaining information about the substitute decision-maker (SDM) role.

METHODS

This is a national cross-sectional online survey of the Australian adult public. The survey examined participants' advance care planning (ACP) awareness and experience, SDM experiences and preferences for obtaining more information about SDM, and participant knowledge about SDM.

RESULTS

Of 1586 people who opened the survey, 1120 (70.6%) were included in the final sample. 13% (n=142) of participants indicated they had acted as an SDM. A median score of two correct responses out of five showed low to moderate knowledge about the SDM role among all participants, with only 33% reporting awareness of SDM laws existing in Australia. While most (59%) participants ranked a health professional as their preferred source of obtaining information about supporting SDMs, few participants who had been an SDM (n=64, 45%) reported obtaining any support in making medical decisions. The median SDM knowledge scores for people who had discussed ACP (3.0 vs 2.0, U=1 45 222, z=6.910, p<0.001), documented their ACP preferences (3.0 vs 2.0, U=71 984, z=4.087, p<0.001) or acted in the SDM role (3.0 vs 2.0, U=56 353, z=-3.694, p<0.001) were significantly higher compared with those who had not.

CONCLUSIONS

The Australian public may have low to moderate knowledge about the SDM role and access only minimal support when making challenging medical decisions.

摘要

目的

描述澳大利亚成年公众对于医疗决策替代决策制定的知识和经历,以及他们获取关于替代决策者(SDM)角色信息的偏好。

方法

这是一项针对澳大利亚成年公众的全国性横断面在线调查。该调查考察了参与者的预先护理计划(ACP)意识和经历、SDM经历以及获取更多关于SDM信息的偏好,还有参与者对SDM的了解。

结果

在1586名打开调查问卷的人中,1120人(70.6%)被纳入最终样本。13%(n = 142)的参与者表示他们曾担任过SDM。在所有参与者中,五道题答对两道的中位数得分表明对SDM角色的了解程度为低到中等,只有33%的人报告知晓澳大利亚存在的SDM法律。虽然大多数(59%)参与者将医疗专业人员列为获取关于支持SDM信息的首选来源,但很少有曾担任过SDM的参与者(n = 64,45%)报告在做出医疗决策时得到过任何支持。与未讨论过ACP的人相比,讨论过ACP的人(3.0对2.0,U = 145222,z = 6.910,p < 0.001)、记录了他们的ACP偏好的人(3.0对2.0,U = 71984,z = 4.087,p < 0.001)或担任过SDM角色的人(3.0对2.0,U = 56353,z = -3.694,p < 0.001)的SDM知识中位数得分显著更高。

结论

澳大利亚公众对SDM角色的了解可能为低到中等,并且在做出具有挑战性的医疗决策时仅能获得极少的支持。

相似文献

1
Public knowledge, preferences and experiences about medical substitute decision-making: a national cross-sectional survey.关于医疗替代决策的公众认知、偏好和经历:一项全国性横断面调查。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021 Mar 15. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002619.
2
Systematic review and content analysis of Australian health care substitute decision making online resources.澳大利亚医疗保健替代决策在线资源的系统评价和内容分析。
Aust Health Rev. 2021 Jun;45(3):317-327. doi: 10.1071/AH20070.
3
Shared Decision Making in Health Care Visits for CKD: Patients' Decisional Role Preferences and Experiences.慢性肾脏病就诊中的共同决策:患者的决策角色偏好和体验。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2023 Dec;82(6):677-686. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2023.04.012. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
4
Exploring advance care planning awareness, experiences, and preferences of people with cancer and support people: an Australian online cross-sectional study.探索癌症患者和支持人员对预先医疗指示的认知、经验和偏好:一项澳大利亚在线横断面研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Jul;29(7):3677-3688. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05878-z. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
5
Randomised trial of a serious illness decision aid (Plan Well Guide) for patients and their substitute decision-makers to improve engagement in advance care planning.一项针对严重疾病决策辅助工具(Plan Well Guide)的随机试验,旨在提高患者及其替代决策人的参与度,以改善预先护理计划。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 Mar;12(1):99-106. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003040. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
6
Single-centre cross-sectional analysis of advance care planning among elderly inpatients.老年住院患者预先护理计划的单中心横断面分析
Intern Med J. 2014 Oct;44(10):967-74. doi: 10.1111/imj.12550.
7
Shared Decision-Making: A Cross-Sectional Study Assessing Patients Awareness and Preferences in Saudi Arabia.共同决策:一项评估沙特阿拉伯患者认知与偏好的横断面研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Apr 13;16:1005-1015. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S332638. eCollection 2022.
8
Does the public feel prepared to be substitute decision-makers? Gaps in preparedness and support for a high school curriculum: a national survey.公众是否感到有准备成为替代决策人?对高中课程的准备和支持方面的差距:一项全国性调查。
Age Ageing. 2021 Jan 8;50(1):242-247. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa100.
9
Shared Decision-Making, Therapeutic Choice, and Decisional Regret in Patients With Alopecia Areata.斑秃患者的共同决策、治疗选择和决策后悔。
JAMA Dermatol. 2022 Oct 1;158(10):1187-1191. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.3025.
10
Effects of online continuing medical education on perspectives of shared decision-making among Chinese endocrinologists.在线继续医学教育对中国内分泌科医生共同决策观念的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Nov 17;23(1):878. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04838-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical frameworks of informed consent in the age of pediatric precision medicine.儿科精准医学时代的知情同意伦理框架。
Camb Prism Precis Med. 2024 May 6;2:e6. doi: 10.1017/pcm.2024.3. eCollection 2024.
2
Analysis of factors that promote the participation of patients with chronic diseases in shared decision making on medication: a cross-sectional survey in Hubei Province, China.分析促进慢性病患者参与药物治疗共享决策的因素:中国湖北省的横断面调查。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Dec 6;23(1):2440. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17099-0.
3
A Revised Approach to Advance Personal Planning: The Role of Theory in Achieving "The Good Result".
改进的预先个人规划方法:理论在实现“好结果”中的作用。
J Bioeth Inq. 2023 Sep;20(3):421-431. doi: 10.1007/s11673-023-10263-6. Epub 2023 May 30.