• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚医疗保健替代决策在线资源的系统评价和内容分析。

Systematic review and content analysis of Australian health care substitute decision making online resources.

机构信息

Advance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, PO Box 5555, Heidelberg, Vic. 3084, Australia. Email:

Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia. Email:

出版信息

Aust Health Rev. 2021 Jun;45(3):317-327. doi: 10.1071/AH20070.

DOI:10.1071/AH20070
PMID:33472740
Abstract

Objective Substitute decision makers (SDMs) can be required to make difficult health care decisions on behalf of individuals lacking decision-making capacity. Online resources may be helpful in preparing and supporting SDMs. This study systematically explored the frequency, content and usability of Australian online resources containing health care substitute decision-making content written for consumers. Methods In April 2019, Google searches were conducted to identify online resources containing health care substitute decision-making content for consumers. Analysis comprised mapping resource characteristics, including target audience (individual-specific, SDM-specific, mixed) and thematic analysis of content. Usability was assessed using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). Results Of the 61 resources identified, the most frequent were webpages (57%), individual-specific (43%) and those produced by government organisations (31%). Only 15 resources (24%) were written for SDMs. Content themes identified were: defining the scope of the SDM role (93%); recommended traits or characteristics of SDMs (80%); instructions or principles regarding standards for decision making (75%); duties of SDMs (70%); and supports (46%), rights (16%), barriers (8%) and benefits (5%) for SDMs. The median (interquartile range) PEMAT scores (out of 100) were 66 (27) for understandability and 60 (55) for actionability. Conclusions SDMs have a vital role in making decisions for people lacking decision-making capacity. Online resources are a potential source of information and support for SDMs in Australia. This study identified key gaps in availability, content and usability of existing SDM resources, highlighting the need for the further development of such resources. We suggest that future resource development include SDMs in the design and evaluation processes. What is known about the topic? An aging population and a greater need for decisions to be made on behalf of others who lack capacity means that health care substitute decision-making is occurring more frequently. Appointing one or more SDMs may occur as part of the advance care planning process. However, being a healthcare SDM can be difficult and stressful. People frequently use the Internet to search for health-related information. What does this paper add? This paper systematically examined the frequency, content and usability of existing Australian online resources with substitute decision-making content written for a consumer audience in English, and identified key gaps in online resources available to support SDMs. What are the implications for practitioners? Although there is a need for resources written for SDMs, authors of online resources need to pay careful attention to the purpose, content and usability of their resource. Future resource development should include input from SDMs and involve them in evaluation to assess whether the resources meet target audience needs.

摘要

目的 代理人决策者(SDM)可能需要代表缺乏决策能力的个人做出困难的医疗保健决策。在线资源可能有助于准备和支持 SDM。本研究系统地探讨了针对消费者编写的具有医疗保健替代决策内容的澳大利亚在线资源的频率、内容和可用性。

方法 2019 年 4 月,进行了谷歌搜索以识别包含针对消费者的医疗保健替代决策内容的在线资源。分析包括映射资源特征,包括目标受众(特定于个人、特定于 SDM、混合)和内容的主题分析。使用患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT)评估可用性。

结果 在确定的 61 个资源中,最常见的是网页(57%)、特定于个人的资源(43%)和政府组织制作的资源(31%)。只有 15 个资源(24%)是为 SDM 编写的。确定的内容主题包括:定义 SDM 角色的范围(93%);推荐 SDM 的特质或特征(80%);关于决策标准的说明或原则(75%);SDM 的职责(70%);以及对 SDM 的支持(46%)、权利(16%)、障碍(8%)和收益(5%)。(100 分制)的 PEMAT 得分中位数(四分位距)为理解度 66(27),可操作性 60(55)。

结论 SDM 在为缺乏决策能力的人做出决策方面发挥着重要作用。在线资源是澳大利亚 SDM 的潜在信息和支持来源。本研究确定了现有 SDM 资源在可用性、内容和可用性方面的关键差距,突出了进一步开发此类资源的必要性。我们建议未来的资源开发包括 SDM 在设计和评估过程中的参与。

关于主题已知的内容?人口老龄化和更多需要代表缺乏能力的其他人做出决策意味着医疗保健替代决策的发生频率更高。任命一个或多个 SDM 可能是预先护理计划过程的一部分。然而,成为医疗保健 SDM 可能很困难和有压力。人们经常使用互联网搜索与健康相关的信息。

这篇论文增加了什么?本研究系统地检查了具有替代决策内容的现有澳大利亚在线资源的频率、内容和可用性,这些资源是针对英语消费者受众编写的,并确定了支持 SDM 的在线资源中存在的关键差距。

对从业者的影响是什么?虽然需要为 SDM 编写资源,但在线资源的作者需要仔细注意其资源的目的、内容和可用性。未来的资源开发应包括 SDM 的投入,并让他们参与评估,以评估资源是否满足目标受众的需求。

相似文献

1
Systematic review and content analysis of Australian health care substitute decision making online resources.澳大利亚医疗保健替代决策在线资源的系统评价和内容分析。
Aust Health Rev. 2021 Jun;45(3):317-327. doi: 10.1071/AH20070.
2
Community knowledge of law at the end of life: availability and accessibility of web-based resources.临终阶段的社区法律知识:网络资源的可用性与可获取性
Aust Health Rev. 2018 Jun;42(3):266-271. doi: 10.1071/AH16234.
3
A systematic evaluation of advance care planning patient educational resources.系统评价预先医疗照护计划患者教育资源。
Geriatr Nurs. 2019 Mar-Apr;40(2):174-180. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2018.09.011. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
4
Advance care planning, culture and religion: an environmental scan of Australian-based online resources.预先护理规划、文化与宗教:对澳大利亚在线资源的环境扫描
Aust Health Rev. 2018 Apr;42(2):152-163. doi: 10.1071/AH16182.
5
Exploring the experiences and perspectives of substitute decision-makers involved in decisions about deceased organ donation: a qualitative study protocol.探索参与已故器官捐赠决策的替代决策者的经历和观点:一项定性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 23;9(12):e034594. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034594.
6
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
7
A content analysis of the consumer-facing online information about My Health Record: Implications for increasing knowledge and awareness to facilitate uptake and use.对面向消费者的 My Health Record 在线信息进行内容分析:提高知识和认识水平以促进采用和使用的意义。
Health Inf Manag. 2018 Sep;47(3):106-115. doi: 10.1177/1833358317712200. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
8
Operationalizing legal rights in end-of- life decision-making: A qualitative study.将法律权利付诸于终末期决策制定之中:一项定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2021 Dec;35(10):1889-1896. doi: 10.1177/02692163211040189. Epub 2021 Aug 22.
9
A scoping review of decision-making tools to support substitute decision-makers for adults with impaired capacity.支持能力受损成年人的替代决策人的决策工具的范围审查。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Jul;72(7):2219-2231. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18812. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
10
Does the public feel prepared to be substitute decision-makers? Gaps in preparedness and support for a high school curriculum: a national survey.公众是否感到有准备成为替代决策人?对高中课程的准备和支持方面的差距:一项全国性调查。
Age Ageing. 2021 Jan 8;50(1):242-247. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa100.

引用本文的文献

1
Co-designing strategies to improve advance care planning among people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds with cancer: iCanCarePlan study protocol.共同设计策略以改善具有癌症的文化和语言背景多样化人群的预先医疗照护计划:iCanCarePlan 研究方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 May 18;23(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01453-z.
2
Explainable online health information truthfulness in Consumer Health Search.消费者健康搜索中可解释的在线健康信息真实性
Front Artif Intell. 2023 Jun 21;6:1184851. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1184851. eCollection 2023.