• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国陆军新兵中激素避孕的使用、骨密度和骨代谢的生化标志物。

Hormonal contraceptive use, bone density and biochemical markers of bone metabolism in British Army recruits.

机构信息

Army Health and Performance Research, British Army, Andover, UK.

Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Mil Health. 2023 Feb;169(1):9-16. doi: 10.1136/bmjmilitary-2020-001745. Epub 2021 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1136/bmjmilitary-2020-001745
PMID:33722817
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Hormonal contraceptive use might impair bone health and increase the risk of stress fracture by decreasing endogenous oestrogen production, a central regulator of bone metabolism. This cross-sectional study investigated bone density and biochemical markers of bone metabolism in women taking hormonal contraceptives on entry to basic military training.

METHODS

Forty-five female British Army recruits had biochemical markers of bone metabolism, areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and tibial speed of sound (tSOS) measured at the start of basic military training. Participants were compared by their method of hormonal contraception: no hormonal contraception (NONE), combined contraceptive pill (CP) or depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) (20±2.8 years, 1.64±0.63 m, 61.7±6.2 kg).

RESULTS

aBMD was not different between groups (p≥0.204), but tSOS was higher in NONE (3%, p=0.014) when compared with DMPA users. Beta C-terminal telopeptide was higher in NONE (45%, p=0.037) and DMPA users (90%, p=0.003) compared with CP users. Procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide was higher in DMPA users compared with NONE (43%, p=0.045) and CP users (127%, p=0.001), and higher in NONE compared with CP users (59%, p=0.014). Bone alkaline phosphatase was higher in DMPA users compared with CP users (56%, p=0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

DMPA use was associated with increased bone turnover and decreased cortical bone integrity of the tibia. Lower cortical bone integrity in DMPA users was possibly mediated by increased intracortical remodelling, but trabecular bone was not affected by contraceptive use.

摘要

引言

激素避孕可能会通过降低内源性雌激素的产生来损害骨骼健康并增加应力性骨折的风险,而雌激素是骨代谢的重要调节剂。本横断面研究调查了进入基础军事训练时服用激素避孕药的女性的骨密度和骨代谢生化标志物。

方法

45 名英国陆军新兵在基础军事训练开始时测量了骨代谢生化标志物、骨密度(aBMD)和胫骨声速(tSOS)。根据激素避孕方法对参与者进行了比较:无激素避孕(NONE)、复方避孕药(CP)或长效醋酸甲羟孕酮(DMPA)(20±2.8 岁,1.64±0.63 米,61.7±6.2 千克)。

结果

各组间 aBMD 无差异(p≥0.204),但与 DMPA 使用者相比,NONE 组 tSOS 更高(3%,p=0.014)。与 CP 使用者相比,NONE 组(45%,p=0.037)和 DMPA 使用者(90%,p=0.003)的β C 端肽更高。与 NONE 组(43%,p=0.045)和 CP 组(127%,p=0.001)相比,DMPA 使用者的原胶原Ⅰ型 N 端前肽更高,与 CP 组相比(59%,p=0.014)更高。DMPA 使用者的骨碱性磷酸酶高于 CP 使用者(56%,p=0.044)。

结论

DMPA 的使用与骨转换增加和胫骨皮质骨完整性降低有关。DMPA 使用者较低的皮质骨完整性可能是通过增加皮质内重塑来介导的,但骨小梁不受避孕方法的影响。

相似文献

1
Hormonal contraceptive use, bone density and biochemical markers of bone metabolism in British Army recruits.英国陆军新兵中激素避孕的使用、骨密度和骨代谢的生化标志物。
BMJ Mil Health. 2023 Feb;169(1):9-16. doi: 10.1136/bmjmilitary-2020-001745. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
2
Hormonal contraceptive use is associated with altered bone structural and metabolic responses to military training in women: An observational cohort study.激素避孕与女性对军事训练的骨结构和代谢反应改变有关:一项观察性队列研究。
Bone. 2024 Apr;181:117012. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2024.117012. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
3
The effect of past use of the injectable contraceptive depot medroxyprogesterone acetate on bone mineral density in normal post-menopausal women.过去使用注射用醋酸甲羟孕酮避孕针剂对正常绝经后妇女骨密度的影响。
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1998 Nov;49(5):615-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.1998.00582.x.
4
Bone density among long-term users of medroxyprogesterone acetate as a contraceptive.醋酸甲羟孕酮作为避孕药长期使用者的骨密度
Contraception. 1998 Dec;58(6):351-5. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00125-5.
5
Trabecular bone in long-term depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate users.长期使用醋酸甲羟孕酮长效注射剂者的小梁骨
Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994 Sep;20(3):269-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.1994.tb00468.x.
6
Differential effects on bone density of progestogen-only methods for contraception in premenopausal women.仅含孕激素的避孕方法对绝经前女性骨密度的不同影响。
Contraception. 1995 Jul;52(1):35-9. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(95)00121-p.
7
Bone density in women receiving depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception.接受醋酸甲羟孕酮长效避孕针的女性的骨密度
BMJ. 1991 Jul 6;303(6793):13-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6793.13.
8
Long-term depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate and bone mineral density.长效醋酸甲羟孕酮与骨矿物质密度
Contraception. 1999 Jan;59(1):25-9. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00144-9.
9
Bone density in long term users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate.醋酸甲羟孕酮长效使用者的骨密度
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Jul;105(7):790-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10211.x.
10
Forearm bone density in users of Depo-Provera as a contraceptive method.使用醋酸甲羟孕酮避孕者的前臂骨密度
Fertil Steril. 1999 May;71(5):849-52. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00084-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Bone mineral density changes during use of progestin-only contraceptives: a rapid review of recent evidence.仅使用孕激素避孕药期间的骨矿物质密度变化:近期证据的快速回顾
AJOG Glob Rep. 2025 May 14;5(3):100509. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100509. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Hormonal Contraception and Bone Metabolism: Emerging Evidence from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies on Post-Pubertal and Reproductive-Age Women.激素避孕与骨代谢:对青春期后及育龄期女性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析的新证据
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Jan 8;18(1):61. doi: 10.3390/ph18010061.
3
Tibial Skeletal Adaptations in Male and Female Marine Corps Officer Candidates Undergoing 10 Weeks of Military Training.
接受为期10周军事训练的海军陆战队男女军官候选人的胫骨骨骼适应性变化
Calcif Tissue Int. 2025 Jan 9;116(1):27. doi: 10.1007/s00223-024-01339-5.
4
Effect of Menstrual Cycle and Hormonal Contraception on Musculoskeletal Health and Performance: Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Design and Cross-Sectional Comparison.月经周期和激素避孕对肌肉骨骼健康和表现的影响:前瞻性队列设计和横断面比较的方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jul 11;13:e50542. doi: 10.2196/50542.