• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种干预角色的比较:同伴监督员和积分赚取者。

A comparison of two intervention roles: peer monitor and point earner.

作者信息

Stern G W, Fowler S A, Kohler F W

机构信息

University of Kansas.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 1988 Spring;21(1):103-9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1988.21-103.

DOI:10.1901/jaba.1988.21-103
PMID:3372401
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1286099/
Abstract

Two fifth-grade students' high levels of off-task and disruptive behavior decreased rapidly during an intervention in which they were appointed peer monitors or point earners. The children worked in dyads in which one child served as a peer monitor and the other child earned points from his or her monitor for good behavior. Points were accumulated as part of a group contingency. We introduced the two appointments in an independent math period and alternated the appointments across days. The peer monitor and point earner roles, when alternated on an every-other-day basis, were equally effective in reducing the students' inappropriate behavior. Furthermore, their behavior during intervention fell well within the range of inappropriate behavior levels exhibited by classmates. The speed with which both students completed their math problems increased during both appointments. The accuracy of their academic work, however, varied; one student improved slightly and the other student decreased slightly in accuracy.

摘要

在一项干预措施中,两名五年级学生的高度注意力不集中和破坏性行为迅速减少。在该干预措施中,他们被指定为同伴监督员或积分赚取者。孩子们两人一组工作,其中一个孩子担任同伴监督员,另一个孩子因良好行为从其监督员那里获得积分。积分作为小组应急措施的一部分进行累积。我们在独立的数学时段引入这两种指定,并隔天交替进行。同伴监督员和积分赚取者的角色,每隔一天交替一次,在减少学生不当行为方面同样有效。此外,他们在干预期间的行为完全处于同学表现出的不当行为水平范围内。在两种指定期间,两名学生完成数学问题的速度都提高了。然而,他们学业作业的准确性有所不同;一名学生的准确性略有提高,另一名学生的准确性略有下降。

相似文献

1
A comparison of two intervention roles: peer monitor and point earner.两种干预角色的比较:同伴监督员和积分赚取者。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1988 Spring;21(1):103-9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1988.21-103.
2
Role reversals: an analysis of therapeutic effects achieved with disruptive boys during their appointments as peer monitors.角色互换:对具有破坏行为的男孩担任同伴监督员期间所取得的治疗效果的分析。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1986 Winter;19(4):437-44. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1986.19-437.
3
The use of peer monitors to reduce negative interaction during recess.使用同伴监督员来减少课间休息期间的负面互动。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Summer;18(2):141-53. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-141.
4
A group contingency program to improve the behavior of elementary school students in a cafeteria.一项旨在改善小学生在自助餐厅行为的群体应急计划。
Behav Modif. 2008 Jan;32(1):121-32. doi: 10.1177/0145445507308577.
5
Positive peer pressure: the effects of peer monitoring on children's disruptive behavior.积极的同伴压力:同伴监督对儿童破坏性行为的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1984 Summer;17(2):213-27. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1984.17-213.
6
The effects of reciprocal peer tutoring and group contingencies on the academic performance of elementary school children.同伴相互辅导和小组应急措施对小学生学业成绩的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1986 Spring;19(1):93-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1986.19-93.
7
Stimulus control in the classroom as a function of the behavior reinforced.课堂中的刺激控制作为强化行为的一项功能。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Fall;10(3):465-78. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-465.
8
Effectiveness of a peer-helper intervention to increase children's social interactions. Generalization, maintenance, and social validity.同伴辅助干预对增加儿童社交互动的有效性。泛化、维持及社会效度。
Behav Modif. 1991 Jan;15(1):22-50. doi: 10.1177/01454455910151002.
9
Feedback in classroom behavior modification: effects on the target and her classmates.课堂行为矫正中的反馈:对目标学生及其同学的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1974 Winter;7(4):591-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1974.7-591.
10
Procedural variations in group contingencies: effects on children's academic and social behaviors.小组应急措施中的程序变化:对儿童学业和社交行为的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1982 Winter;15(4):533-44. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1982.15-533.

本文引用的文献

1
Achievement Place: development of the elected manager system.成就地点:选举经理制度的发展。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1973 Winter;6(4):541-61. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1973.6-541.
2
Positive peer pressure: the effects of peer monitoring on children's disruptive behavior.积极的同伴压力:同伴监督对儿童破坏性行为的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1984 Summer;17(2):213-27. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1984.17-213.
3
The use of peer monitors to reduce negative interaction during recess.使用同伴监督员来减少课间休息期间的负面互动。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1985 Summer;18(2):141-53. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1985.18-141.
4
Role reversals: an analysis of therapeutic effects achieved with disruptive boys during their appointments as peer monitors.角色互换:对具有破坏行为的男孩担任同伴监督员期间所取得的治疗效果的分析。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1986 Winter;19(4):437-44. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1986.19-437.