1Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Research Medicine Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
2Nuffield Department of Medicine, Nuffield Department of Medicine Research Building, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Mar 15;104(5):1777-1781. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0818.
Despite estimates suggesting Leptospira spp. being endemic in Southeast Asia, evidence remains limited. Diagnostic accuracy evaluations based on Leptospira ELISA mainly rely on hospitalized and severe patients; therefore, studies measuring the pathogen burden may be inaccurate in the community. We evaluated the Panbio Leptospira ELISA IgM among 656 febrile outpatients attending primary care in Chiangrai, Thailand, and Hlaing Tha Yar, Yangon, Myanmar. ELISA demonstrated limited diagnostic accuracy for the detection of acute leptospiral infection using the manufacturer recommended cutoff, with a sensitivity of 71.4% and specificity of 36.4%, and an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve value of 0.65 (95% CI: 0.41-0.89), compared with our reference test, the PCR assay. ELISA also performed poorly as a screening tool for detecting recent exposure to Leptospira spp. compared with the "gold-standard" microscopic agglutination test, with a specificity of 42.7%. We conclude that the utility of the Leptospira IgM ELISA for both serodiagnosis and seroprevalence is limited in our setting.
尽管有研究估计钩端螺旋体病在东南亚流行,但证据仍然有限。基于酶联免疫吸附试验(Leptospira ELISA)的诊断准确性评估主要依赖于住院和重症患者;因此,衡量病原体负担的研究在社区中可能并不准确。我们评估了在泰国清莱和缅甸仰光的 HLAING THA YAR 接受初级保健的 656 名发热门诊患者的 Panbio 钩端螺旋体病 IgM。使用制造商推荐的截断值,酶联免疫吸附试验对急性钩端螺旋体感染的检测显示出有限的诊断准确性,敏感性为 71.4%,特异性为 36.4%,受试者工作特征曲线下面积值为 0.65(95%CI:0.41-0.89),与我们的参考检测,聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测相比。与“金标准”显微镜凝集试验相比,酶联免疫吸附试验作为检测近期接触钩端螺旋体病的筛查工具的特异性也较低,为 42.7%。我们的结论是,在我们的环境中,Leptospira IgM ELISA 用于血清学诊断和血清流行率的实用性有限。