Rilinger Jonathan, Zotzmann Viviane, Bemtgen Xavier, Rieg Siegbert, Biever Paul M, Duerschmied Daniel, Pottgiesser Torben, Kaier Klaus, Bode Christoph, Staudacher Dawid L, Wengenmayer Tobias
Department of Medicine III (Interdisciplinary Medical Intensive Care), Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Department of Cardiology and Angiology I, Heart Center Freiburg University, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Artif Organs. 2021 Sep;45(9):1050-1060. doi: 10.1111/aor.13954. Epub 2021 May 4.
Prognosis of patients suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is poor. This is especially true for immunosuppressed patients. It is controverisal whether these patients should receive veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) while evidence on this topic is sparse. We report retrospective data of a single-center registry of patients with severe ARDS requiring ECMO support between October 2010 and June 2019. Patients were analyzed by their status of immunosuppression. ECMO weaning success and hospital survival were analyzed before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Moreover, ventilator free days (VFD) were compared. A total of 288 patients were analyzed (age 55 years, 67% male), 88 (31%) presented with immunosuppression. Survival rates were lower in immunosuppressed patients (27% vs. 53%, P < .001 and 27% vs. 48% after PSM, P = .006). VFD (60 days) were lower for patients with immunosuppression (11.9 vs. 22.4, P < .001), and immunosuppression was an independent predictor for mortality in multivariate analysis. Hospital survival was 20%, 14%, 35%, and 46% for patients with oncological malignancies, solid organ transplantation, autoimmune diseases, and HIV, respectively. In this analysis immunosuppression was an independent predictor for mortality. However, there were major differences in the weaning and survival rates between the etiologies of immunosuppression which should be considered in decision making.
急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者的预后较差。免疫抑制患者尤其如此。对于这些患者是否应接受静脉-静脉体外膜肺氧合(VV ECMO)治疗存在争议,且关于这一主题的证据稀少。我们报告了2010年10月至2019年6月期间一家单中心登记处中需要ECMO支持的重症ARDS患者的回顾性数据。根据患者的免疫抑制状态进行分析。在倾向评分匹配(PSM)前后分析ECMO撤机成功率和住院生存率。此外,还比较了无呼吸机天数(VFD)。共分析了288例患者(年龄55岁,67%为男性),其中88例(31%)存在免疫抑制。免疫抑制患者的生存率较低(27%对53%,P <.001;PSM后为27%对48%,P =.006)。免疫抑制患者的VFD(60天)较低(11.9对22.4,P <.001),且在多变量分析中免疫抑制是死亡的独立预测因素。肿瘤性恶性疾病、实体器官移植、自身免疫性疾病和HIV患者的住院生存率分别为20%、14%、35%和46%。在本分析中,免疫抑制是死亡的独立预测因素。然而,免疫抑制病因之间的撤机和生存率存在重大差异,在决策时应予以考虑。