Use of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in trauma patients with severe adult respiratory distress syndrome: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND

The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has increased, although its survival benefit in trauma patients with severe adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains controversial. We investigated the effect of veno-venous (VV)-ECMO on the clinical outcomes of trauma patients with severe ARDS.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study at a single center comprising trauma patients admitted between January 2013 and December 2017, diagnosed with severe ARDS using the Berlin definition (PaO2/FiO2 ratio ⩽100), in the 7 days following trauma. Patients were managed with VV-ECMO or conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality (mortality at 60 days); secondary outcomes comprised 28-day mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, ICU-free days, duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), and MV-free days. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for the baseline differences.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients (22.5%) were managed with VV-ECMO and 55 were managed with CMV. After matching, the in-hospital mortality rate (43.8% vs 53.1%;  = 0.760), 28-day mortality rate (37.5% vs 31.3%;  = 0.750), median hospital LOS (39.5 vs 36.5 days;  = 0.533), ICU-free days (0 vs 0 days;  = 0.241), and MV-free days (0 vs 0 days;  = 0.272) did not significantly differ between the VV-ECMO and CMV groups.

CONCLUSION

In-hospital mortality (mortality at 60 days) did not differ significantly between the VV-ECMO and CMV groups. Although the safety of ECMO in trauma patients requires further investigation, VV-ECMO may be considered as a rescue therapy.