Shelley P, Wroblewski B M
Centre for Hip Surgery, Wrightington Hospital, Wigan, Lancashire, England.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988 May;70(3):358-63. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.70B3.3372554.
An experimental evaluation was made of the efficacy of an unflanged cup, an ogee-flanged cup and the Exeter pressuriser in the pressurisation of acetabular cement. Only a very modest injection pressure could be generated through an unflanged socket and even this was readily lost as the socket "bottomed out". The ogee-flanged socket gave a consistently high injection pressure which could be maintained throughout the process of polymerisation. The Exeter pressuriser gave marginally better results. Of the two cements tested, Palacos with gentamicin showed better intrusion than CMW Type 1 cement, but it also allowed greater extrusion once pressure was released. The importance of maintaining a continuous pressure on the cement throughout polymerisation is emphasised.
对无凸缘杯、S形凸缘杯和埃克塞特加压装置在髋臼骨水泥加压方面的效果进行了实验评估。通过无凸缘臼杯只能产生非常适度的注射压力,而且当臼杯“到底”时,这种压力很容易就消失了。S形凸缘臼杯能产生持续的高注射压力,并且在整个聚合过程中都能保持。埃克塞特加压装置的效果略好一些。在测试的两种骨水泥中,含庆大霉素的帕拉科斯骨水泥比CMW 1型骨水泥的渗入性更好,但在压力释放后,它也允许更多的挤出。强调了在整个聚合过程中对骨水泥保持持续压力的重要性。