• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

让照护者参与设计和评估针对儿童的阿片类药物风险和安全沟通干预措施。

Involving caregivers in design and assessment of opioid risk and safety communication intervention in children.

机构信息

Social and Administrative Sciences in Pharmacy Division, University of Wisconsin, Madison School of Pharmacy, Madison, WI 53705, USA.

American Family Children's Hospital, Madison, WI 53705, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Oct;104(10):2432-2436. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.03.001. Epub 2021 Mar 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2021.03.001
PMID:33726987
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Opportunities to enhance opioid medication safety among children are frequently overlooked. There is little information about what information caregivers want when a child receives an opioid prescription following surgery.

OBJECTIVE

This paper explores pediatric caregivers' baseline knowledge and expectations for opioid medication consults in order to refine an opioid safety consultation intervention. Second, it, assesses caregivers' post-consult knowledge and evaluation after they received the refined opioid safety consultation.

PATIENT INVOLVEMENT

Pediatric patient caregivers were involved in designing and evaluating an opioid education intervention.

METHODS

Fifteen pediatric caregivers were interviewed about opioid consultations in the pre-intervention phase to inform the design of the subsequent opioid risk and safety consultation intervention. An opioid safety consultation intervention was then developed. Another 15 pediatric caregivers were interviewed in the post-intervention phase to explore impact of the revised intervention. Inductive content analysis was used to analyze data.

RESULTS

Caregivers in the pre-intervention phase reported some knowledge about opioids, wanted to know if their child was prescribed an opioid and wanted information about its opioid risks and safety. Caregivers in the post-intervention phase reported an increase in knowledge about opioid risks and safety, recognized benefit of pharmacists describing the medication as an "opioid", appreciated the handout and were satisfied with the topics covered in the consultation.

DISCUSSION

Discussing opioid risks can be uncomfortable for pharmacists and patients. This study explored pediatric caregivers' expectations about opioid consults and information they wanted to receive from pharmacists. This was used to develop a patient-centered education intervention which was then evaluated by caregivers for effectiveness, convenience, and comfort.

PRACTICAL VALUE

This study reports pediatric caregivers' perspectives and expectations about opioid consults which provide guidance for pharmacists to facilitate open and informative counseling for opioid medications.

摘要

背景

加强儿童阿片类药物安全的机会经常被忽视。关于儿童接受手术后阿片类药物处方时照顾者需要什么信息,信息很少。

目的

本研究旨在探讨儿科照顾者在接受手术后接受阿片类药物处方时的基线知识和期望,以完善阿片类药物安全咨询干预措施。其次,评估照顾者在接受改进后的阿片类药物安全咨询后获得的咨询后知识和评估。

患者参与

儿科患者照顾者参与了阿片类药物教育干预措施的设计和评估。

方法

在干预前阶段,15 名儿科照顾者接受了有关阿片类药物咨询的访谈,为随后的阿片类药物风险和安全咨询干预措施的设计提供信息。然后开发了一种阿片类药物安全咨询干预措施。在干预后阶段,对另外 15 名儿科照顾者进行了访谈,以探讨修订后的干预措施的影响。采用归纳内容分析法分析数据。

结果

干预前阶段的照顾者报告了一些关于阿片类药物的知识,他们希望了解他们的孩子是否开了阿片类药物,并希望了解其阿片类药物风险和安全性的信息。干预后阶段的照顾者报告称,他们对阿片类药物风险和安全性的知识有所增加,认识到药剂师描述药物为“阿片类药物”的好处,他们赞赏讲义并对咨询中涵盖的主题感到满意。

讨论

与药剂师和患者讨论阿片类药物的风险可能会让人感到不适。本研究探讨了儿科照顾者对阿片类药物咨询的期望以及他们希望从药剂师那里获得的信息。这是为了开发一种以患者为中心的教育干预措施,然后由照顾者对其有效性、便利性和舒适度进行评估。

实用价值

本研究报告了儿科照顾者对阿片类药物咨询的看法和期望,为药剂师提供了指导,以促进阿片类药物的开放和信息咨询。

相似文献

1
Involving caregivers in design and assessment of opioid risk and safety communication intervention in children.让照护者参与设计和评估针对儿童的阿片类药物风险和安全沟通干预措施。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Oct;104(10):2432-2436. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.03.001. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
2
Pharmacy intervention to facilitate transparent opioid-risk and safety communication.促进透明阿片类药物风险和安全沟通的药学干预。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2020 Nov-Dec;60(6):1015-1020. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2020.08.022. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
3
Using role theory to explore pharmacist role conflict in opioid risks communication.运用角色理论探索药师在阿片类药物风险沟通中的角色冲突。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Aug;16(8):1121-1126. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.11.012. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
4
Handout use to facilitate opioid risk and safety communication in community pharmacies.用于促进社区药店中阿片类药物风险和安全沟通的讲义。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2021 Sep-Oct;61(5):e96-e102. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.06.010. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
5
Patient and pediatric caregiver experiences and expectations about opioid risk education and counselling.患者及儿童护理者对阿片类药物风险教育与咨询的体验及期望。
J Opioid Manag. 2020 May/Jun;16(3):227-232. doi: 10.5055/jom.2020.0573.
6
Evaluating the Effect a of Handout on Community Pharmacists' Opioid Safety Counseling.评估一份手册对社区药剂师阿片类药物安全咨询的影响。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2021 Feb 28;9(1):49. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy9010049.
7
Student pharmacist opioid consultations with standardized limited English proficiency patients: A pre-post educational intervention study.学生药剂师为英语水平有限的标准化患者提供阿片类药物咨询:一项前后教育干预研究。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2021 Feb;13(2):146-151. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2020.09.006. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
8
Student pharmacist opioid risk consultations: a pre-post educational intervention study.学生药剂师阿片类药物风险咨询:一项前后教育干预研究。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2022 Jun 25;30(3):279-283. doi: 10.1093/ijpp/riac024.
9
The impact of pharmacist's counseling on pediatric patients' caregiver's knowledge on epilepsy and its treatment in a tertiary hospital.药师咨询对三级医院儿科患者照顾者癫痫知识及其治疗的影响。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Oct;35(5):829-34. doi: 10.1007/s11096-013-9817-5. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
10
Pediatric medication use experiences and patient counseling in community pharmacies: Perspectives of children and parents.社区药房中儿童用药经历及患者咨询:儿童与家长的观点
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017 Jan-Feb;57(1):38-46.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2016.08.019. Epub 2016 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review on the frequency and quality of reporting patient and public involvement in patient safety research.关于患者及公众参与患者安全研究报告的频率与质量的系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 26;24(1):532. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11021-z.