• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估一份手册对社区药剂师阿片类药物安全咨询的影响。

Evaluating the Effect a of Handout on Community Pharmacists' Opioid Safety Counseling.

作者信息

Thakur Tanvee, Chewning Betty

机构信息

Social and Administrative Sciences Division, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy, Madison, WI 53705, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacy (Basel). 2021 Feb 28;9(1):49. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy9010049.

DOI:10.3390/pharmacy9010049
PMID:33670946
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8005952/
Abstract

Community pharmacists are the most accessible healthcare professionals to counsel patients about opioid risks and safety. Resources such as handouts are needed to improve pharmacists' self-efficacy about opioid safety counseling. This study aims to understand the effects and usefulness of handouts in opioid risk and safety counseling in community pharmacists. Three community pharmacies participated in this study for three weeks, where five pharmacists participated in completing a survey about the process and integration of a handout in opioid medication consultation. Pharmacists filled the survey after counseling patients for opioid medication/s. Field observations were conducted at one of these sites as well. A total of 57 consults were recorded via surveys in these pharmacies. Only using the handout to guide the conversation was rated much less useful than integrating the handout and showing it to patient in the consult ( = 0.94, adjusted = 0.29, p< .00001). Satisfaction about the patient education provided increased if opioid risks and safety topics were discussed ( = 0.7, adjusted = 0.32, = 0.00015). Patients seemed engaged in the consults, which was evident from the head nods, questions asked, and attention toward the pharmacist. Effective communication with patients or patient caregivers about opioid safety can be accomplished by using and modeling use of this handout and by providing structured instructions to use this handout optimally.

摘要

社区药剂师是最容易接触到的医疗保健专业人员,可为患者提供有关阿片类药物风险和安全性的咨询。需要诸如宣传资料之类的资源来提高药剂师在阿片类药物安全咨询方面的自我效能感。本研究旨在了解宣传资料在社区药剂师进行阿片类药物风险和安全咨询中的效果及实用性。三家社区药房参与了为期三周的本研究,其中五名药剂师参与完成了一项关于宣传资料在阿片类药物咨询过程及整合情况的调查。药剂师在为患者提供阿片类药物咨询后填写调查问卷。同时还在其中一个地点进行了实地观察。这些药房通过调查共记录了57次咨询。结果显示,仅使用宣传资料来引导对话的有用性远低于在咨询过程中将宣传资料整合并展示给患者(=0.94,校正后=0.29,p<.00001)。如果讨论了阿片类药物风险和安全主题,患者对所提供的患者教育的满意度会提高(=0.7,校正后=0.32,=0.0

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Effect a of Handout on Community Pharmacists' Opioid Safety Counseling.评估一份手册对社区药剂师阿片类药物安全咨询的影响。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2021 Feb 28;9(1):49. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy9010049.
2
Handout use to facilitate opioid risk and safety communication in community pharmacies.用于促进社区药店中阿片类药物风险和安全沟通的讲义。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2021 Sep-Oct;61(5):e96-e102. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.06.010. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
3
Pharmacy intervention to facilitate transparent opioid-risk and safety communication.促进透明阿片类药物风险和安全沟通的药学干预。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2020 Nov-Dec;60(6):1015-1020. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2020.08.022. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
4
Involving caregivers in design and assessment of opioid risk and safety communication intervention in children.让照护者参与设计和评估针对儿童的阿片类药物风险和安全沟通干预措施。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Oct;104(10):2432-2436. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.03.001. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
5
Pharmacists opioid risk and safety counseling practices: A latent class analysis approach.药剂师的阿片类药物风险与安全咨询实践:一种潜在类别分析方法。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Jun;18(6):3013-3018. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.07.023. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
6
A comparison of patients' and pharmacists' satisfaction with medication counseling provided by community pharmacies: a cross-sectional survey.社区药房提供的用药咨询服务中患者与药剂师满意度的比较:一项横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr 14;16:131. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1374-x.
7
Using role theory to explore pharmacist role conflict in opioid risks communication.运用角色理论探索药师在阿片类药物风险沟通中的角色冲突。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Aug;16(8):1121-1126. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.11.012. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
8
Pharmacist self-reported antidepressant medication counseling.药剂师自我报告的抗抑郁药物咨询。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2013 Jul-Aug;53(4):390-9. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2013.12112.
9
Student pharmacist opioid consultations with standardized limited English proficiency patients: A pre-post educational intervention study.学生药剂师为英语水平有限的标准化患者提供阿片类药物咨询:一项前后教育干预研究。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2021 Feb;13(2):146-151. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2020.09.006. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
10
Differences between pharmacists' perception of counseling and practice in the era of prescription drug misuse.处方药滥用时代药剂师对咨询的认知与实践之间的差异。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2020 Jan-Mar;18(1):1682. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2020.1.1682. Epub 2020 Feb 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacists' perspectives on MedSMA℞T: A serious game to educate youth about opioid safety.药剂师对 MedSMA℞T 的看法:一款用于教育青少年阿片类药物安全知识的严肃游戏。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2023 Jul-Aug;63(4):1087-1094.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2023.04.020. Epub 2023 Apr 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Handout use to facilitate opioid risk and safety communication in community pharmacies.用于促进社区药店中阿片类药物风险和安全沟通的讲义。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2021 Sep-Oct;61(5):e96-e102. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.06.010. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
2
Pharmacy intervention to facilitate transparent opioid-risk and safety communication.促进透明阿片类药物风险和安全沟通的药学干预。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2020 Nov-Dec;60(6):1015-1020. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2020.08.022. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
3
Using role theory to explore pharmacist role conflict in opioid risks communication.
运用角色理论探索药师在阿片类药物风险沟通中的角色冲突。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Aug;16(8):1121-1126. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.11.012. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
4
Pharmacist roles, training, and perceived barriers in naloxone dispensing: A systematic review.药剂师在纳洛酮配药方面的角色、培训和感知障碍:系统评价。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2020 Jan-Feb;60(1):178-194. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2019.06.016. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
5
Pharmacist Services in the Opioid Crisis: Current Practices and Scope in the United States.阿片类药物危机中的药剂师服务:美国的当前实践与范围
Pharmacy (Basel). 2019 Jun 13;7(2):60. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy7020060.
6
A Framework for Rigorous Qualitative Research as a Component of Mixed Method Rapid-Cycle Evaluation.作为混合方法快速循环评估组成部分的严谨定性研究框架。
Qual Health Res. 2019 Jan;29(2):279-289. doi: 10.1177/1049732318795675. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
7
Promising roles for pharmacists in addressing the U.S. opioid crisis.药剂师在解决美国阿片类药物危机方面的大有可为。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Aug;15(8):910-916. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.12.009. Epub 2017 Dec 31.
8
Pharmacists' Role in Opioid Safety: A Focus Group Investigation.药剂师在阿片类药物安全方面的作用:一项焦点小组调查。
Pain Med. 2018 Sep 1;19(9):1799-1806. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx139.
9
The science of stakeholder engagement in research: classification, implementation, and evaluation.研究中利益相关者参与的科学:分类、实施与评估。
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Sep;7(3):486-491. doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0495-z.
10
Perpetuating stigma or reducing risk? Perspectives from naloxone consumers and pharmacists on pharmacy-based naloxone in 2 states.延续污名还是降低风险?来自两个州纳洛酮使用者和药剂师对基于药房的纳洛酮的看法。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017 Mar-Apr;57(2S):S19-S27.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2017.01.013. Epub 2017 Feb 14.