• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声引导阴部神经阻滞联合异丙酚深度镇静与椎管内麻醉用于痔切除术:一项前瞻性随机研究。

Ultrasound-Guided Pudendal Nerve Block Combined with Propofol Deep Sedation versus Spinal Anesthesia for Hemorrhoidectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China.

出版信息

Pain Res Manag. 2021 Feb 26;2021:6644262. doi: 10.1155/2021/6644262. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1155/2021/6644262
PMID:33727997
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7935604/
Abstract

Several anesthesia techniques were applied to hemorrhoidectomy, but postoperative pain and urinary retention were still two unsolved problems. The aim of this prospective randomized study was to evaluate the effect of ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block (PNB) combined with deep sedation compared to spinal anesthesia for hemorrhoidectomy. . One hundred and twenty patients undergoing Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy were randomized to receive PNB combined with deep sedation using propofol (Group PNB,  = 60) or spinal anesthesia (Group SA,  = 60). Pain intensity was assessed using the visual analogue scale (0: no pain to 10: worst possible pain). The primary outcome was pain scores recorded at rest at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h and on walking at 12, 24, 36, and 48 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were analgesic consumption, side effects, and patient satisfaction after surgery. . Ultrasound-guided bilateral PNB combined with deep sedation using propofol could successfully be applied to Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. Postoperative pain intensity was significantly lower in Group PNB compared to Group SA at rest at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h ( < 0.001) and during mobilization at 12, 24, 36, and 48 h ( < 0.001) postoperatively. Sufentanil consumption in Group PNB was significantly lower than that in Group SA, during 0-24 h ( < 0.001) and during 24-48 h ( < 0.001) postoperatively. Urinary retention was significantly lower in Group PNB compared to Group SA (6.9% vs 20%, =0.034). The patients in Group PNB had higher satisfaction compared to Group SA ( < 0.001). . Ultrasound-guided PNB combined with propofol sedation is an effective anesthesia technique for Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy.

摘要

几种麻醉技术被应用于痔切除术,但术后疼痛和尿潴留仍然是两个未解决的问题。本前瞻性随机研究的目的是评估超声引导阴部神经阻滞(PNB)联合深度镇静与脊髓麻醉在痔切除术的效果。120 例接受 Milligan-Morgan 痔切除术的患者被随机分为接受 PNB 联合丙泊酚深度镇静(PNB 组,n=60)或脊髓麻醉(SA 组,n=60)。疼痛强度采用视觉模拟评分法(0:无痛至 10:最痛)评估。主要结局是记录术后 3、6、12、24、36 和 48 小时静息时和术后 12、24、36 和 48 小时行走时的疼痛评分。次要结局是术后镇痛药物消耗、不良反应和患者满意度。超声引导双侧 PNB 联合丙泊酚深度镇静可成功应用于 Milligan-Morgan 痔切除术。与 SA 组相比,PNB 组术后静息时 3、6、12、24、36 和 48 小时(<0.001)和术后 12、24、36 和 48 小时(<0.001)疼痛强度明显降低,移动时疼痛强度明显降低。与 SA 组相比,PNB 组舒芬太尼消耗在 0-24 小时(<0.001)和 24-48 小时(<0.001)期间明显降低。与 SA 组相比,PNB 组尿潴留发生率明显降低(6.9% vs 20%,=0.034)。与 SA 组相比,PNB 组患者满意度更高(<0.001)。超声引导 PNB 联合丙泊酚镇静是一种有效的 Milligan-Morgan 痔切除术麻醉技术。

相似文献

1
Ultrasound-Guided Pudendal Nerve Block Combined with Propofol Deep Sedation versus Spinal Anesthesia for Hemorrhoidectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study.超声引导阴部神经阻滞联合异丙酚深度镇静与椎管内麻醉用于痔切除术:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Pain Res Manag. 2021 Feb 26;2021:6644262. doi: 10.1155/2021/6644262. eCollection 2021.
2
Ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block in patients undergoing open hemorrhoidectomy: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.超声引导阴部神经阻滞在开放式痔切除术患者中的应用:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Sep;35(9):1741-1747. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03630-x. Epub 2020 May 30.
3
Ultrasound-guided intersphincteric space block combined with spinal anesthesia for hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized clinical trial.超声引导下肛门括约肌间阻滞联合椎管内麻醉在痔切除术的应用:一项随机临床试验。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2024 Apr;90(4):254-262. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.24.17780-2.
4
Nerve stimulator-guided pudendal nerve block vs general anesthesia for postoperative pain management after anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair: a prospective randomized trial.神经刺激器引导阴部神经阻滞与全身麻醉用于前、后壁阴道修补术后的疼痛管理:一项前瞻性随机试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2016 Nov;34:668-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.07.024. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
5
Ultrasound-Guided Pudendal Nerve Block versus Ultrasound-Guided Dorsal Penile Nerve Block for Pediatric Distal Hypospadias Surgery.超声引导阴部神经阻滞与超声引导阴茎背神经阻滞在小儿远端尿道下裂手术中的比较。
Urol Int. 2023;107(4):370-376. doi: 10.1159/000521718. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
6
Nerve stimulator guided pudendal nerve block versus general anesthesia for hemorrhoidectomy.痔切除术采用神经刺激器引导阴部神经阻滞与全身麻醉的比较。
Can J Anaesth. 2006 Jun;53(6):579-85. doi: 10.1007/BF03021848.
7
Pudendal Nerve Block in Hemorrhoid Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.痔手术中阴部神经阻滞:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2021 May;64(5):617-631. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001985.
8
Ligasure versus diathermy hemorrhoidectomy under spinal anesthesia or pudendal block with ropivacaine: a randomized prospective clinical study with 1-year follow-up.脊髓麻醉或罗哌卡因阴部阻滞下Ligasure痔切除术与电刀痔切除术的比较:一项为期1年随访的随机前瞻性临床研究
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009 Sep;24(9):1011-8. doi: 10.1007/s00384-009-0715-1. Epub 2009 Apr 25.
9
Ultrasound-Guided Pudendal Nerve Block in Patients Undergoing Open Hemorrhoidectomy: A Post-Hoc Cost-Effectiveness Analysis from a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.超声引导下开放性痔切除术患者的阴部神经阻滞:一项双盲随机对照试验的事后成本效益分析
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Apr 28;13:299-306. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S306138. eCollection 2021.
10
Effect of Pudendal Nerve Block on the Prevention of Postoperative Bladder Spasm and Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort in Male Patients Undergoing Transurethral Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate.阴部神经阻滞对经尿道钬激光前列腺剜除术男性患者术后膀胱痉挛和导尿管相关性膀胱不适的预防作用。
Clin Interv Aging. 2022 Nov 30;17:1729-1738. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S384612. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
PROSPECT guideline for haemorrhoid surgery: A systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations.痔手术的PROSPECT指南:系统评价及特定手术方式的术后疼痛管理建议
Eur J Anaesthesiol Intensive Care. 2023 May 26;2(3):e0023. doi: 10.1097/EA9.0000000000000023. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
The impact of combined administration of ropivacaine and dexamethasone on postoperative analgesia in perianal surgery with pudendal nerve block under ultrasound guidance: a prospective randomized controlled study.超声引导下阴部神经阻滞罗哌卡因与地塞米松联合给药对肛周手术术后镇痛的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jun 27;15:1366070. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1366070. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block in patients undergoing open hemorrhoidectomy: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.超声引导阴部神经阻滞在开放式痔切除术患者中的应用:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Sep;35(9):1741-1747. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03630-x. Epub 2020 May 30.
2
Accuracy of Ultrasound-Guided Pudendal Nerve Block in the Ischial Spine and Alcock's Canal Levels: A Cadaveric Study.超声引导下坐骨棘和阿尔科克管水平阴部神经阻滞的准确性:一项尸体研究
Pain Med. 2020 Nov 1;21(11):2692-2698. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa136.
3
Perianal Block: Is It as Good as Spinal Anesthesia for Closed Hemorrhoidectomies?
Comparison between the Efficacy of Sacral Erector Spina Plane Block and Pudendal Block on Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort: A Prospective Randomized Study.骶棘肌平面阻滞与阴部神经阻滞对导管相关性膀胱不适疗效的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 20;13(12):3617. doi: 10.3390/jcm13123617.
4
The role of pudendal nerve block in hemorrhoid surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind randomized controlled trials.阴部神经阻滞在痔疮手术中的作用:双盲随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Dec 13;10:1283512. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1283512. eCollection 2023.
5
Impact of Intraspinal Nerve Block Anesthesia on Intrapartum Fever and the Neonate.椎管内神经阻滞麻醉对产时发热及新生儿的影响
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 May 29;2022:2600755. doi: 10.1155/2022/2600755. eCollection 2022.
肛周阻滞:对于闭合性痔切除术,它与脊髓麻醉效果一样好吗?
Anesth Essays Res. 2018 Jan-Mar;12(1):36-41. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_225_17.
4
Is the severe pain after Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy still currently remaining a major postoperative problem despite being one of the oldest surgical techniques described? A case series of 117 consecutive patients.尽管Milligan-Morgan痔切除术是描述得最早的外科手术技术之一,但术后剧痛目前仍是一个主要的术后问题吗?对117例连续患者的病例系列研究。
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;30:73-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.11.018. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
5
Evidence-Based Management of Pain After Excisional Haemorrhoidectomy Surgery: A PROSPECT Review Update.痔切除术后疼痛的循证管理:一项前瞻性综述更新
World J Surg. 2017 Feb;41(2):603-614. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3737-1.
6
Comparison of hemorrhoidectomy by LigaSure with conventional Milligan Morgan's hemorrhoidectomy.LigaSure痔切除术与传统Milligan Morgan痔切除术的比较。
Pak J Med Sci. 2016 May-Jun;32(3):657-61. doi: 10.12669/pjms.323.9976.
7
Ultrasound-Guided Pudendal Nerve Block at the Entrance of the Pudendal (Alcock) Canal: Description of Anatomy and Clinical Technique.超声引导下在阴部(阿尔科克)管入口处进行阴部神经阻滞:解剖学描述及临床技术
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Mar-Apr;41(2):140-5. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000355.
8
Systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing clinical outcomes and effectiveness of surgical treatments for haemorrhoids.系统评价和网络荟萃分析比较痔的手术治疗的临床结局和效果。
Br J Surg. 2015 Dec;102(13):1603-18. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9913. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
9
Postoperative Outcome Comparison Between Pudendal Nerve Block and Caudal Block After Lateral Open Internal Sphincterotomy.外侧开放式内括约肌切开术后阴部神经阻滞与骶管阻滞的术后结果比较
Med Arch. 2015 Jun;69(3):187-9. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2015.69.187-189. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
10
Pain intensity on the first day after surgery: a prospective cohort study comparing 179 surgical procedures.术后第一天的疼痛强度:比较 179 种手术的前瞻性队列研究。
Anesthesiology. 2013 Apr;118(4):934-44. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31828866b3.