CIAMS, Univ. Paris-Sud., Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, 91405, France.
CIAMS, Université d'Orléans, Orléans, Orléans, 45067, France.
F1000Res. 2020 Aug 13;9:984. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.25570.2. eCollection 2020.
Stretching is commonly used in physical therapy as a rehabilitation tool to improve range of motion and motor function. However, is stretching an efficient method to improve gait, and if so, for which patient category? A systematic review of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis was conducted using relevant databases. Every patient category and every type of stretching programs were included without multicomponent programs. Data were meta-analysed where possible. Estimates of effect sizes (reported as standard mean difference (SMD)) with their respective 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were reported for each outcome. The PEDro scale was used for the quality assessment. Twelve studies were included in the analysis. Stretching improved gait performance as assessed by walking speed and stride length only in a study with a frail elderly population, with small effect sizes (both SMD= 0.49; 95% CI: 0.03, 0.96; PEDro score: 3/10). The total distance and the continuous walking distance of the six-minute walking test were also improved only in a study in an elderly population who had symptomatic peripheral artery disease, with large effect sizes (SMD= 1.56; 95% CI: 0.66, 2.45 and SMD= 3.05; 95% CI: 1.86, 4.23, respectively; PEDro score: 5/10). The results were conflicting in healthy older adults or no benefit was found for most of the performance, spatiotemporal, kinetic and angular related variables. Only one study (PEDro score: 6/10) showed improvements in stance phase duration (SMD=-1.92; 95% CI: -3.04, -0.81), swing phase duration (SMD=1.92; 95 CI: 0.81, 3.04), double support phase duration (SMD= -1.69; 95% CI: -2.76, -0.62) and step length (SMD=1.37; 95% CI: 0.36, 2.38) with large effect sizes. There is no strong evidence supporting the beneficial effect of using stretching to improve gait. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to understand the impact of stretching on human gait.
拉伸通常被用作物理治疗的康复工具,以改善运动范围和运动功能。但是,拉伸是否是改善步态的有效方法,如果是,对于哪些患者类别有效?本研究通过系统综述和荟萃分析,对随机和非随机对照试验进行了评估。纳入了所有患者类别和所有类型的拉伸方案,不包括多组分方案。在可能的情况下对数据进行荟萃分析。对于每个结局,报告了估计的效应大小(报告为标准均数差(SMD))及其相应的 95%置信区间(95%CI)。使用 PEDro 量表进行质量评估。共纳入 12 项研究。只有在一项针对虚弱老年人的研究中,拉伸才改善了步态表现,表现为步行速度和步长的提高,其效应量较小(SMD=0.49;95%CI:0.03,0.96;PEDro 评分:3/10)。在一项患有症状性外周动脉疾病的老年人群中,六分钟步行测试的总距离和连续步行距离也得到了改善,其效应量较大(SMD=1.56;95%CI:0.66,2.45 和 SMD=3.05;95%CI:1.86,4.23,分别;PEDro 评分:5/10)。在健康老年人中,结果存在矛盾,或者大多数表现、时空、动力学和角度相关变量没有受益。只有一项研究(PEDro 评分:6/10)显示在站立阶段持续时间(SMD=-1.92;95%CI:-3.04,-0.81)、摆动阶段持续时间(SMD=1.92;95CI:0.81,3.04)、双支撑阶段持续时间(SMD=-1.69;95%CI:-2.76,-0.62)和步长(SMD=1.37;95%CI:0.36,2.38)方面有所改善,其效应量较大。没有强有力的证据支持使用拉伸来改善步态的有益效果。需要进一步的随机对照试验来了解拉伸对人类步态的影响。