Suppr超能文献

肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统抑制剂与2019冠状病毒病:一项荟萃分析与系统评价

Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors and COVID-19: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

作者信息

Hassib Mohab, Hamilton Steven, Elkhouly Ahmed, Li Yiting, Kaplan Adam C

机构信息

Internal Medicine, Saint Francis Medical Center, Trenton, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2021 Feb 4;13(2):e13124. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13124.

Abstract

Introduction Increased virulence, the severity of illness, and mortality have all been hypothesized with respect to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) use in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. Our study aims to assess whether ACEi/ARB use in patients with COVID-19 conferred worsened severity of illness or increased mortality. Additionally, we explore the possibility of an unearthed protective benefit due to their interruption of the RAS signaling pathway as observed in cardiovascular diseases. Methods The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE were searched for studies relevant to COVID-19 severity, mortality, and inflammation in the context of ACEi/ARB use. Eight studies were included with a total of 17,943 patients, 4,292 (23.9%) of which were taking an ACEi or an ARB. The study population was 47.9% female and the average age across all studies was 65. The studies chosen had a sample size of at least 100 patients. Results Mortality outcomes were assessed in six studies and showed no significant difference in mortality among the ACEi/ARB and control groups (odds ratio [OR]: 0.99, 95%CI: 0.48-2.04). Seven studies assessed the severity of COVID-19 and showed no statistically significant difference in disease severity when comparing the ACEi/ARB group to the control group (odds ratio [OR]: 1.30, 95% CI 0.87-1.94). Four studies reported the length of stay with no significant difference between the ACEi/ARB groups as compared to non-users. Four studies included inflammatory markers C-reactive protein (CRP) and D-Dimer, which were noted to be consistently lower in the ACEi/ARB groups when compared to control groups, however, this was not statistically significant. Conclusion Our study found no significant difference in mortality, severity of illness, or length of stay between ACEi/ARB users and non-users with COVID-19 infection. These results support the continuation of ACEi and ARBs in the setting of COVID-19 as advised by the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA). The decrease in CRP and D-dimer suggests a possible protective effect related to ACEi/ARB use in COVID-19, however, more studies with larger sample sizes are needed to establish this effect.

摘要

引言 关于在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)感染中使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi)/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB),人们已经假设其会增加病毒毒力、疾病严重程度和死亡率。我们的研究旨在评估COVID-19患者使用ACEi/ARB是否会导致疾病严重程度恶化或死亡率增加。此外,我们探讨了由于它们在心血管疾病中观察到的对RAS信号通路的阻断作用而可能存在的潜在保护益处。方法 在Cochrane图书馆、MEDLINE和EMBASE中检索与在使用ACEi/ARB情况下的COVID-19严重程度、死亡率和炎症相关的研究。纳入了八项研究,共17943名患者,其中4292名(23.9%)正在服用ACEi或ARB。研究人群中女性占47.9%,所有研究的平均年龄为65岁。所选研究的样本量至少为100名患者。结果 在六项研究中评估了死亡率结果,ACEi/ARB组和对照组之间的死亡率无显著差异(优势比[OR]:0.99,95%置信区间:0.48 - 2.04)。七项研究评估了COVID-19的严重程度,将ACEi/ARB组与对照组进行比较时,疾病严重程度无统计学显著差异(优势比[OR]:1.30,95%置信区间0.87 - 1.94)。四项研究报告了住院时间,ACEi/ARB组与未使用者之间无显著差异。四项研究纳入了炎症标志物C反应蛋白(CRP)和D-二聚体,与对照组相比,ACEi/ARB组的这些标志物一直较低,然而,这在统计学上并不显著。结论 我们的研究发现,COVID-19感染者中使用ACEi/ARB者与未使用者在死亡率、疾病严重程度或住院时间方面没有显著差异。这些结果支持美国心脏病学会(ACC)/美国心脏协会(AHA)的建议,即在COVID-19情况下继续使用ACEi和ARB。CRP和D-二聚体的降低表明在COVID-19中使用ACEi/ARB可能存在保护作用,然而,需要更多样本量更大的研究来证实这种作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b481/7936537/d1727bef45fb/cureus-0013-00000013124-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验