• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

量化临床专业选择的经济价值及其与录取竞争力的关联。

Quantifying the Financial Value of Clinical Specialty Choice and Its Association With Competitiveness of Admissions.

作者信息

Puri Pranav, Landman Natalie, Smoldt Robert K, Cortese Denis

机构信息

Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, USA.

Center for Healthcare Delivery and Policy, Arizona State University, Phoenix, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2021 Feb 10;13(2):e13272. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13272.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.13272
PMID:33728207
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7949657/
Abstract

Background The factors influencing medical student clinical specialty choice have important implications for the future composition of the US physician workforce. The objective of this study was to determine the career net present values (NPVs) of US medical students' clinical specialty choices and identify any relationships between a specialty's NPV and competitiveness of admissions as measured by the US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 scores. Methodology NPVs were calculated using the results of the 2019 Doximity Physician Compensation report, a survey of 90,000 physicians. Mean USMLE Step 1 scores for matched US allopathic seniors in the 2018 National Resident Matching Program were used as a measure of clinical specialties' competitiveness of admissions. We calculated a composite measure of NPV and annual work-hours by dividing each specialty's NPV by the reported average number of hours worked per year. Results In our analysis, orthopedic surgery had the highest NPV ($10,308,868), whereas family medicine had the lowest NPV ($5,274,546). Dermatology and plastic surgery had the highest mean USMLE Step 1 scores (249 for both), whereas family medicine had the lowest (220). Clinical specialties' NPVs were positively associated with mean USMLE Step 1 scores (Pearson's r = 0.82; p < 0.001). Conclusions In this study, we describe associations suggesting that medical students respond to financial incentives in choosing clinical specialties and that these decisions are mediated by USMLE Step 1 scores. This underscores the importance of titrating and aligning incentives to improve the allocation of medical students into clinical specialties.

摘要

背景 影响医学生临床专业选择的因素对美国医生劳动力的未来构成具有重要意义。本研究的目的是确定美国医学生临床专业选择的职业净现值(NPV),并确定专业的NPV与美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第一步成绩所衡量的录取竞争力之间的关系。方法 使用2019年Doximity医生薪酬报告(对90,000名医生的调查)结果计算NPV。2018年全国住院医师匹配计划中匹配的美国全科医学高年级学生的USMLE第一步平均成绩用作临床专业录取竞争力的衡量标准。我们通过将每个专业的NPV除以报告的每年平均工作小时数来计算NPV和年工作小时数的综合指标。结果 在我们的分析中,骨科手术的NPV最高(10,308,868美元),而家庭医学的NPV最低(5,274,546美元)。皮肤科和整形外科的USMLE第一步平均成绩最高(均为249分),而家庭医学的成绩最低(220分)。临床专业的NPV与USMLE第一步平均成绩呈正相关(Pearson's r = 0.82;p < 0.001)。结论 在本研究中,我们描述的关联表明医学生在选择临床专业时会对经济激励做出反应,并且这些决定由USMLE第一步成绩介导。这强调了调整和调整激励措施以改善医学生在临床专业中的分配的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5f1/7949657/182583b7a663/cureus-0013-00000013272-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5f1/7949657/635cf622bb2d/cureus-0013-00000013272-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5f1/7949657/182583b7a663/cureus-0013-00000013272-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5f1/7949657/635cf622bb2d/cureus-0013-00000013272-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5f1/7949657/182583b7a663/cureus-0013-00000013272-i02.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantifying the Financial Value of Clinical Specialty Choice and Its Association With Competitiveness of Admissions.量化临床专业选择的经济价值及其与录取竞争力的关联。
Cureus. 2021 Feb 10;13(2):e13272. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13272.
2
The association of USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 CK scores with residency match specialty and location.美国医师执照考试第一步(USMLE Step 1)和第二步临床知识考试(Step 2 CK)成绩与住院医师匹配专业及地点的关联。
Med Educ Online. 2017;22(1):1358579. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2017.1358579.
3
Financial Implications of Physician Specialty Choice.医生专业选择的财务影响
R I Med J (2013). 2018 Oct 1;101(8):50-55.
4
Positive predictive value of medical student specialty choices.医学生专业选择的阳性预测值。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Mar 9;18(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1138-x.
5
Successfully matching into surgical specialties: an analysis of national resident matching program data.成功匹配到外科专业:对全国住院医师匹配计划数据的分析。
J Grad Med Educ. 2010 Sep;2(3):316-21. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-09-00020.1.
6
Student academic performance factors affecting matching into first-choice residency and competitive specialties.影响匹配首选住院医师和竞争专业的学生学业成绩因素。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jul 1;19(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1669-9.
7
The R.O.A.D. confirmed: ratings of specialties' lifestyles by fourth-year US medical students with a military service obligation.“道路”研究证实:有服兵役义务的美国四年级医学生对各专业生活方式的评分。
Fam Med. 2013 Apr;45(4):240-6.
8
Exploring Factors Influencing Medical Trainees' Specialty Choice: Insights from a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey in Jordan.探索影响医学实习生专业选择的因素:来自约旦全国横断面调查的见解
Teach Learn Med. 2025 Jun-Jul;37(3):300-310. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2024.2364265. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
9
Correlation of the National Emergency Medicine M4 Clerkship Examination with USMLE Examination Performance.国家急诊医学M4临床实习考试与美国医师执照考试成绩的相关性。
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Dec;16(7):1159-65. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.10.25496. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
10
Imbalanced specialty representation of USMLE and NBME test writers.美国医师执照考试和美国医师执照考试委员会出题人专业分布失衡。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Sep 9;24(1):980. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05976-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Cross-sectional Survey of Medical student perceptions of And desires for Research and Training pathways (SMART): an analysis of prospective cohort study of UK medical students.横断面调查医学生对研究和培训途径的看法和期望(SMART):对英国医学生前瞻性队列研究的分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Dec 15;23(1):964. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04881-2.
2
Medical resident's pursuing specialty and differences in clinical proficiency among medical residents in Japan: a nationwide cross-sectional study.日本住院医师的专业追求和临床能力差异:一项全国性横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jun 22;23(1):464. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04429-4.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The USMLE Step 1 Decision: An Opportunity for Medical Education and Training.美国医师执照考试第一步的决策:医学教育与培训的一个契机。
JAMA. 2020 May 26;323(20):2017-2018. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.3198.
2
The Conundrum of the United States Medical Licensing Examination Score Reporting Structure.美国医师执照考试分数报告结构的难题
JAMA. 2019 Aug 20;322(7):605-606. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.9669.
3
Estimating the Attributable Cost of Physician Burnout in the United States.估算美国医生倦怠的归因成本。
Medical Schools as Racialized Organizations: How Race-Neutral Structures Sustain Racial Inequality in Medical Education-a Narrative Review.
医学院校的种族化组织:种族中立结构如何在医学教育中维持种族不平等——叙事评论。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jul;37(9):2259-2266. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07500-w. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jun 4;170(11):784-790. doi: 10.7326/M18-1422. Epub 2019 May 28.
4
Changes in Burnout and Satisfaction With Work-Life Integration in Physicians and the General US Working Population Between 2011 and 2017.2011 年至 2017 年期间医生和美国普通工作人口的倦怠和工作-生活融合满意度变化。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Sep;94(9):1681-1694. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.10.023. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
5
Student Perspectives on the "Step 1 Climate" in Preclinical Medical Education.医学生眼中的临床前医学教育“第一步气候”。
Acad Med. 2019 Mar;94(3):302-304. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002565.
6
Association Between Physician Burnout and Identification With Medicine as a Calling.医生职业倦怠与将医学视为一种使命的认同之间的关联。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Mar;92(3):415-422. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.11.012. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
7
Borrow or Serve? An Economic Analysis of Options for Financing a Medical School Education.借贷还是服务?医学院校教育融资选择的经济分析
Acad Med. 2017 Jul;92(7):966-975. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001572.
8
A medical education as an investment: financial food for thought.作为一种投资的医学教育:财务方面的启示。
Am J Med. 2014 Jan;127(1):7-11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.08.004. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
9
Annual work hours across physician specialties.各医学专科的年度工作时长。
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Jul 11;171(13):1211-3. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.294.