Takasaki Hiroshi, Kawazoe Shota
Department of Physical Therapy, Saitama Prefectural University, Koshigaya, Japan.
J Exerc Rehabil. 2021 Feb 23;17(1):28-38. doi: 10.12965/jer.2040866.433. eCollection 2021 Feb.
In the Functional Movement Screen (FMS), a subgroup of those with a score of 1 due to limitations in the active straight leg raising (ASLR) but not in the passive straight leg raising is considered to have a stability or motor control dysfunction (SMCD). The FMS proposes the use of the movements in a reverse pattern to improve FMS scores. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the reverse pattern of the ASLR (reverse-ASLR) was more effective than repeating the ASLR to improve the FMS score in participants with the FMS ASLR score of 1 due to the SMCD (ASLR-1-SMCD). A two-armed randomized controlled trial was conducted in individuals with the ASLR-1-SMCD. The intervention was either the reverse-ASLR or the ASLR exercise on both sides at home for a month followed by a 1-month wait-and-see interval, wherein the primary outcome measure was the right FMS ASLR score. Forty participants were randomized to the ASLR exercise group (n=20) or the reverse-ASLR exercise group (n=20). The Fisher exact test demonstrated a statistically significant difference (=0.020) in the proportion of those with FMS ASLR score improvement to a score of 2 (ASLR exercise group, one; reverse-ASLR exercise group, eight) at follow-up 1, but no significance (=0.106) at follow-up 2 (ASLR exercise group, none; reverse-ASLR exercise group, four). This study indicated that the reverse-ASLR exercise was more effective than repeating the ASLR exercise in order to improve the ASLR score among individuals with the ASLR-1-SMCD.
在功能性动作筛查(FMS)中,因主动直腿抬高(ASLR)受限但被动直腿抬高不受限而得1分的人群亚组被认为存在稳定性或运动控制功能障碍(SMCD)。FMS建议采用反向模式的动作来提高FMS分数。本研究的目的是调查在因SMCD导致FMS的ASLR得分为1(ASLR-1-SMCD)的参与者中,ASLR的反向模式(反向ASLR)是否比重复ASLR更能有效提高FMS分数。对患有ASLR-1-SMCD的个体进行了一项双臂随机对照试验。干预措施为在家中进行反向ASLR或双侧ASLR练习,为期1个月,随后为1个月的观察期,其中主要结局指标是右侧FMS的ASLR分数。40名参与者被随机分为ASLR练习组(n = 20)或反向ASLR练习组(n = 20)。Fisher精确检验显示,在随访1时,FMS的ASLR分数提高到2分的比例(ASLR练习组,1例;反向ASLR练习组,8例)有统计学显著差异(=0.020),但在随访2时无显著差异(=0.106)(ASLR练习组,0例;反向ASLR练习组,4例)。本研究表明,在ASLR-1-SMCD个体中,反向ASLR练习比重复ASLR练习更能有效提高ASLR分数。