• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

功能性运动筛查的实时组内和组间可靠性。

Real-time intersession and interrater reliability of the functional movement screen.

机构信息

School of Allied Medical Professions, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Feb;26(2):408-15. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318220e6fa.

DOI:10.1519/JSC.0b013e318220e6fa
PMID:22266547
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the real-time intersession and interrater reliability of the functional movement screen (FMS). The overall study consisted of 19 volunteer civilians (12 male, 7 female). The intersession reliability consisted of 12 men and 7 women, whereas 10 men and 6 women participated in the interrater reliability test session. Two raters (A and B) were involved in the interrater reliability aspect of this study. The FMS includes 7 tests: deep squat (DS), hurdle step (HS), in-line lunge (IL), shoulder mobility (SM), active straight leg raise (ASLR), trunk stability push-up (TSPU), and rotary stability (RS). Researchers analyzed the data via intraclass correlation (ICC). To determine the reliability of the intersession scoring of the FMS and the intrasession interrater scoring of the FMS a 2-way mixed effects model intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC(3,1)) was used for the continuous data, whereas a weighted Cohen's kappa (κ) was used for the categorical data. The dependent variables were FMS total score (0-21 scale) and associated tests were DS, HS, IL, SM, ASLR, TSPU, and RS. Intersession reliability (ICC, SEM) and κ were as follows: FMS total score (0.92, 0.51), DS (κ = 0.69), HS (κ = 0.16), IL (κ = 0.69), SM (κ = 0.84), ASLR (κ = 0.69), TSPU (κ = 0.77), and RS (no covariance). Interrater reliability (ICC, SEM) and κ were as follows: FMS total score (0.98, 0.25), DS (κ = 1.0), HS (κ = 0.33), IL (κ = 0.88), SM (κ = 0.90), ASLR (κ = 0.88), TSPU (κ = 0.75), and RS (no covariance). The FMS total scores displayed high intersession and interrater reliabilities. Finally, with the exception of HS, all tasks displayed moderate to high intersession reliability and good to high interrater reliability.

摘要

本研究旨在检验功能性运动筛查(FMS)的实时组内和组间可靠性。整个研究包括 19 名志愿平民(12 名男性,7 名女性)。组内可靠性包括 12 名男性和 7 名女性,而 10 名男性和 6 名女性参加了组间可靠性测试。两名评估者(A 和 B)参与了这项研究的组间可靠性方面。FMS 包括 7 项测试:深蹲(DS)、跨栏步(HS)、直线弓步(IL)、肩部活动度(SM)、主动直腿抬高(ASLR)、躯干稳定性俯卧撑(TSPU)和旋转稳定性(RS)。研究人员通过组内相关系数(ICC)分析数据。为了确定 FMS 组内评分的可靠性和 FMS 组内评分的组间可靠性,使用 2 路混合效应模型组内相关系数(ICC(3,1))对连续数据进行分析,而对分类数据使用加权 Cohen's kappa(κ)。因变量为 FMS 总分(0-21 分),相关测试为 DS、HS、IL、SM、ASLR、TSPU 和 RS。组内可靠性(ICC、SEM)和 κ 如下:FMS 总分(0.92,0.51),DS(κ=0.69),HS(κ=0.16),IL(κ=0.69),SM(κ=0.84),ASLR(κ=0.69),TSPU(κ=0.77),RS(无协方差)。组间可靠性(ICC、SEM)和 κ 如下:FMS 总分(0.98,0.25),DS(κ=1.0),HS(κ=0.33),IL(κ=0.88),SM(κ=0.90),ASLR(κ=0.88),TSPU(κ=0.75),RS(无协方差)。FMS 总分显示出高度的组内和组间可靠性。最后,除了 HS 之外,所有任务都显示出中等到高度的组内可靠性和良好到高度的组间可靠性。

相似文献

1
Real-time intersession and interrater reliability of the functional movement screen.功能性运动筛查的实时组内和组间可靠性。
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Feb;26(2):408-15. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318220e6fa.
2
The Functional Movement Screen: a reliability study.功能性运动筛查:可靠性研究。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Jun;42(6):530-40. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.3838. Epub 2012 May 14.
3
Interrater and intrarater reliability of the functional movement screen.功能性运动测试的组内和组间信度。
J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Apr;27(4):982-7. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182606df2.
4
Item-level and Composite-level Interrater Reliability of Functional Movement Screen™ Scores Following Condensed Training in Novice Raters.新手评估者经过精简培训后,功能性动作筛查™评分在项目层面和综合层面的评估者间信度
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2021 Jul 2;16(4):1016-1024. doi: 10.26603/001c.25793. eCollection 2021.
5
Development of an Abbreviated Model for Predicting Functional Movement Screen Score Within Tactical Populations.发展一种用于预测战术人群功能性运动筛查评分的简化模型。
J Strength Cond Res. 2024 Mar 1;38(3):607-611. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004701.
6
Interrater reliability of the functional movement screen.功能性运动筛查的组内信度。
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Feb;24(2):479-86. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c09c04.
7
Sex-related Differences in Functional Movement Screen Scores Among Reserve Officers' Training Corps Cadets.后备军官训练团学员功能性动作筛查分数的性别差异
Mil Med. 2023 Jan 4;188(1-2):e152-e157. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usaa417.
8
Injury history, sex, and performance on the functional movement screen and Y balance test.损伤史、性别以及在功能性动作筛查和Y平衡测试中的表现。
J Athl Train. 2015 May;50(5):475-85. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.6.02. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
9
How reliable are Functional Movement Screening scores? A systematic review of rater reliability.功能性运动筛查评分的可靠性如何?一项评分者可靠性的系统评价。
Br J Sports Med. 2016 May;50(9):527-36. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094913. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
10
A preliminary investigation into the relationship between functional movement screen scores and athletic physical performance in female team sport athletes.一项关于女性团队运动员功能性运动筛查评分与运动表现之间关系的初步研究。
Biol Sport. 2015 Mar;32(1):41-51. doi: 10.5604/20831862.1127281. Epub 2014 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Amateur Rowers to Transatlantic Trio Race Winners: A Case Study Describing the Physiological and Psychological Characteristics, Training Adaptations and Race Responses to Ultra-Endurance Rowing.业余赛艇选手成为跨大西洋三人赛冠军:一项描述超耐力赛艇运动的生理和心理特征、训练适应性及比赛反应的案例研究
Eur J Sport Sci. 2025 Sep;25(9):e70040. doi: 10.1002/ejsc.70040.
2
Interrater Reliability of Functional Movement Screening Test among Untrained Undergraduate Raters Undergoing a One-off Training Session.一次性培训课程后未经训练的本科评估者之间功能动作筛查测试的评分者间信度
Malays J Med Sci. 2025 Feb;32(1):121-126. doi: 10.21315/mjms-09-2024-740. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
3
The Development and Content of Movement Quality Assessments in Athletic Populations: A Systematic Review and Multilevel Meta-Analysis.
运动员群体运动质量评估的发展与内容:一项系统评价和多层次荟萃分析
Sports Med Open. 2025 Jan 23;11(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40798-025-00813-0.
4
Assessing inter- and intra-rater reliability of movement scores and the effects of body-shape using a custom visualisation tool: an exploratory study.使用定制可视化工具评估评分者间和评分者内运动评分的可靠性以及体型的影响:一项探索性研究。
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024 Sep 30;16(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s13102-024-00988-1.
5
The Functional Movement Screen: Exploring Interrater Reliability between Raters in the Updated Version.功能性动作筛查:探究更新版本中评估者之间的评分者间信度。
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2023 Jun 1;V18(3):737-745. doi: 10.26603/001c.74724. eCollection 2023.
6
Three-Dimensional Motion Capture Data of a Movement Screen from 183 Athletes.183 名运动员的运动屏幕三维运动捕捉数据。
Sci Data. 2023 Apr 24;10(1):235. doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02082-6.
7
Functional Movement Screen™ in High School Basketball Players: Pre- and Post-Season.高中篮球运动员的功能性动作筛查™:赛季前和赛季后
Int J Exerc Sci. 2021 Dec 1;15(6):1-14. doi: 10.70252/OMBI1507. eCollection 2022.
8
Inter-Rater and Intra-Rater Reliability of Return-to-Work Screening Tests for UK Firefighters Following Injury.英国消防员受伤后重返工作岗位筛查测试的评分者间和评分者内信度
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Nov 27;10(12):2381. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10122381.
9
Effects of Core Stability Training on Functional Movement Patterns in Tennis Players.核心稳定性训练对网球运动员功能性运动模式的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 30;19(23):16033. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316033.
10
Effectiveness of the Functional Movement Screen for assessment of injury risk occurrence in football players.功能性动作筛查对评估足球运动员受伤风险发生情况的有效性。
Biol Sport. 2022 Oct;39(4):889-894. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2022.107482. Epub 2021 Nov 10.