Eiraldi Ricardo, Khanna Muniya, Jawad Abbas F, Power Thomas J, Cacia Jaclyn, Cabello Beatriz, Schwartz Billie S, Swift Lauren, Kanine Rebecca, Orapallo Andrew, McCurdy Barry, Mautone Jennifer A
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Roberts Center for Pediatric Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 2716 South Street, 8 Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19146-2305, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4319, USA.
Evid Based Pract Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2020;5(4):437-451. doi: 10.1080/23794925.2020.1784056. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
School-based mental health programs are increasingly recognized as methods by which to improve children's access to evidence-based practices (EBPs), particularly in urban under resourced communities. School-wide positive behavior interventions and supports (PBIS) is one approach to integrating mental health services into school-based programming; however, school providers require training and support to implement programs as intended. We have conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare two models for training school-based personnel to deliver group EBPs to children at high risk of developing internalizing or externalizing problems. School personnel (N = 24) from 6 schools in a large urban school district were trained with either a basic training and consultation strategy, or an enhanced training and consultation strategy. Preliminary findings show that the enhanced strategy resulted in 9% higher content fidelity than the basic strategy. School personnel who were switched to the basic strategy had slightly lower content fidelity for the last two years of the trial and school personnel who continued to receive basic consultation during the step-down phase saw their fidelity decline. The two conditions did not differ with regard to process fidelity.
基于学校的心理健康项目越来越被视为一种方法,通过它可以改善儿童获得循证实践(EBPs)的机会,尤其是在资源匮乏的城市社区。全校范围的积极行为干预与支持(PBIS)是将心理健康服务纳入校本课程的一种方法;然而,学校工作人员需要培训和支持才能按预期实施项目。我们进行了一项随机对照试验,比较两种培训校本人员的模式,以便为有内化或外化问题高风险的儿童提供团体循证实践。来自一个大型城市学区6所学校的学校工作人员(N = 24)接受了基本培训和咨询策略或强化培训和咨询策略的培训。初步结果表明,强化策略的内容保真度比基本策略高9%。在试验的最后两年,转而采用基本策略的学校工作人员的内容保真度略低,而在逐步减少阶段继续接受基本咨询的学校工作人员的保真度则下降。在过程保真度方面,两种情况没有差异。