• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童和猴子高估高对比度刺激物的大小。

Children and monkeys overestimate the size of high-contrast stimuli.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The Citadel, Charleston, SC, 29409, USA.

Department of Psychology and Language Research Center, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Jul;83(5):2123-2135. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02272-7. Epub 2021 Mar 16.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-021-02272-7
PMID:33728511
Abstract

The letter height superiority effect reveals that human adults judge letters to be taller than identically sized pseudoletters. This effect extends to words, such that words are estimated to be greater in size or lasting longer in duration than pseudowords of the same size or those presented for the same duration. The physical properties of letters and words also impact their perceived size, such that higher contrast between figure-ground stimuli leads to greater size estimates. Specifically, black letters on a white background (high contrast between figure and ground) are judged to be taller than gray letters and gray pseudoletters on a white background (low contrast between figure and ground) for adult humans. In the current study, we assessed whether this effect would extend to nonverbal stimuli (shapes) such that high-contrast shapes would lead to greater size estimates relative to low-contrast shapes for human children and rhesus monkeys in a two-choice discrimination task. We found that children and monkeys tended to overestimate the size of high-contrast shapes relative to low-contrast shapes consistent with results reported among human adults. Implications for perceptual fluency and its impact on subjective size estimates are discussed.

摘要

字母高度优势效应表明,人类成年人判断字母比相同大小的伪字母更高。这种效应延伸到单词,使得单词的大小或持续时间估计比相同大小的伪词或呈现相同持续时间的伪词更长。字母和单词的物理特性也会影响它们的感知大小,例如,图形与背景之间更高的对比度会导致更大的大小估计。具体来说,黑色字母在白色背景上(图形和背景之间的对比度高)比灰色字母和灰色伪字母在白色背景上(图形和背景之间的对比度低)对于成年人类来说更高。在当前的研究中,我们评估了这种效应是否会扩展到非语言刺激(形状),例如,在二选一辨别任务中,高对比度的形状相对于低对比度的形状会导致人类儿童和恒河猴的大小估计更大。我们发现,儿童和猴子倾向于高估高对比度形状的大小相对于低对比度形状,这与在人类成年人中报告的结果一致。讨论了知觉流畅性及其对主观大小估计的影响。

相似文献

1
Children and monkeys overestimate the size of high-contrast stimuli.儿童和猴子高估高对比度刺激物的大小。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Jul;83(5):2123-2135. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02272-7. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
2
The letter height superiority illusion.字母高度优势错觉。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Feb;23(1):291-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0753-8.
3
Exploring the Jastrow Illusion in Humans ( Homo sapiens), Rhesus Monkeys ( Macaca mulatta), and Capuchin Monkeys ( Sapajus apella).探索人类(智人)、恒河猴(猕猴)和卷尾猴(白喉卷尾猴)中的贾斯特罗错觉。
Perception. 2019 May;48(5):367-385. doi: 10.1177/0301006619838181. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
4
The black superiority effect: Black is taller than gray.黑人优越性效应:黑色比灰色高。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Jan;202:102958. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102958. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
5
Judgments of duration, figure-ground contrast, and size for words and nonwords.对单词和非单词的持续时间、图形-背景对比度及大小的判断。
Percept Psychophys. 2004 Oct;66(7):1105-14. doi: 10.3758/bf03196839.
6
Do you see what I see? A comparative investigation of the Delboeuf illusion in humans (Homo sapiens), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).你看到我所看到的了吗?一项关于人类(智人)、恒河猴(猕猴)和卷尾猴(僧帽猴)中德勃夫错觉的对比研究。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2015 Oct;41(4):395-405. doi: 10.1037/xan0000078. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
7
Exploring whether nonhuman primates show a bias to overestimate dense quantities.探索非人类灵长类动物是否表现出高估密集数量的倾向。
J Comp Psychol. 2017 Feb;131(1):59-68. doi: 10.1037/com0000058.
8
Linear numerosity illusions in capuchin monkeys (Sapajus apella), rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta), and humans (Homo sapiens).卷尾猴(僧面猴属)、恒河猴(猕猴属)和人类(智人)中的线性数量错觉。
Anim Cogn. 2019 Sep;22(5):883-895. doi: 10.1007/s10071-019-01288-9. Epub 2019 Jun 29.
9
Contextual effects on perceived contrast: figure-ground assignment and orientation contrast.情境对感知对比度的影响:图形-背景分配与方向对比度
J Vis. 2015 Feb 2;15(2):2. doi: 10.1167/15.2.2.
10
Children (Homo sapiens), but not rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), perceive the one-is-more illusion.人类儿童能感知“数量多即更多”错觉,而恒河猴则不能。
J Comp Psychol. 2022 Nov;136(4):270-278. doi: 10.1037/com0000316. Epub 2022 Apr 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Consistently Inconsistent Perceptual Illusions in Nonhuman Primates: The Importance of Individual Differences.非人灵长类动物中持续存在的不一致性感知错觉:个体差异的重要性。
Animals (Basel). 2022 Dec 21;13(1):22. doi: 10.3390/ani13010022.

本文引用的文献

1
The black superiority effect: Black is taller than gray.黑人优越性效应:黑色比灰色高。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Jan;202:102958. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102958. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
2
Can reptiles perceive visual illusions? Delboeuf illusion in red-footed tortoise (Chelonoidis carbonaria) and bearded dragon (Pogona vitticeps).爬行动物能感知视觉错觉吗?红腿陆龟(Chelonoidis carbonaria)和鬃狮蜥(Pogona vitticeps)的德勃夫错觉。
J Comp Psychol. 2019 Nov;133(4):419-427. doi: 10.1037/com0000176. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
3
Perception of the Delboeuf illusion by the adult domestic cat (Felis silvestris catus) in comparison with other mammals.
成年家猫(Felis silvestris catus)对德勃夫错觉的感知与其他哺乳动物的比较。
J Comp Psychol. 2019 May;133(2):223-232. doi: 10.1037/com0000152. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
4
A metacognitive illusion in monkeys.猴子身上的一种元认知错觉。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Sep 13;284(1862). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1541.
5
Effects of meaning and symmetry on judgments of size.意义和对称性对大小判断的影响。
Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 4;5:1270. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01270. eCollection 2014.
6
The effect of font size on reading comprehension on second and fifth grade children: bigger is not always better.字号大小对二、五年级儿童阅读理解的影响:并非越大越好。
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 19;8(9):e74061. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074061. eCollection 2013.
7
A reversed Ebbinghaus-Titchener illusion in bantams (Gallus gallus domesticus).矮脚鸡(家鸡)中的反向艾宾浩斯-铁钦纳错觉
Anim Cogn. 2014 Mar;17(2):471-81. doi: 10.1007/s10071-013-0679-y. Epub 2013 Aug 31.
8
When less is more: like humans, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) misperceive food amounts based on plate size.少即是多:与人类一样,黑猩猩(黑猩猩属)会根据盘子大小误判食物量。
Anim Cogn. 2014 Mar;17(2):427-34. doi: 10.1007/s10071-013-0674-3. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
9
Simultaneous brightness contrast of foraging Papilio butterflies.觅食中的凤蝶的同时亮度对比。
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 May 22;279(1735):1911-8. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.2396. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
10
Judgments of learning reflect encoding fluency: conclusive evidence for the ease-of-processing hypothesis.学习判断反映了编码流畅性:对加工容易性假说的有力证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Sep;37(5):1264-9. doi: 10.1037/a0023719.