Department of Cardiovascular Surgery Mount Sinai Health System New York NY.
Department of Medicine Westchester Medical Center Valhalla NY.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Apr 6;10(7):e018514. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018514. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
Mitral annular calcification with mitral valve disease is a challenging problem that could necessitate surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR). Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) is emerging as a feasible alternative in high-risk patients with appropriate anatomy. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to December 25, 2019 for studies discussing SMVR or TMVR in patients with mitral annular calcification; 27 of 1539 articles were selected for final review. TMVR was used in 15 studies. Relevant data were available on 82 patients who underwent hybrid transatrial TMVR, and 354 patients who underwent transapical or transseptal TMVR. Outcomes on SMVR were generally reported as small case series (447 patients from 11 studies); however, 1 large study recently reported outcomes in 9551 patients. Patients who underwent TMVR had a shorter median follow-up of 9 to 12 months (range, in-hospital‒19 months) compared with patients with SMVR (54 months; range, in-hospital‒120 months). Overall, those undergoing TMVR were older and had higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk scores. SMVR showed a wide range of early (0%-27%; median 6.3%) and long-term mortality (0%-65%; median at 1 year, 15.8%; 5 years, 38.8%, 10 years, 62.4%). The median in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality rates were 16.7%, 22.7%, and 43%, respectively, for transseptal/transapical TMVR, and 9.5%, 20.0%, and 40%, respectively, for transatrial TMVR. Mitral annular calcification is a complex disease and TMVR, with a versatile option of transatrial approach in patients with challenging anatomy, offers a promising alternative to SMVR in high-risk patients. However, further studies are needed to improve technology, patient selection, operative expertise, and long-term outcomes.
二尖瓣环钙化合并二尖瓣疾病是一个具有挑战性的问题,可能需要进行外科二尖瓣置换术(SMVR)。经导管二尖瓣置换术(TMVR)作为一种可行的替代方案,正在适形解剖结构的高危患者中出现。从 1999 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月 25 日,我们在 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库中检索了讨论二尖瓣环钙化患者 SMVR 或 TMVR 的研究;最终有 27 篇文章符合审查标准。有 15 项研究使用 TMVR。有 82 例接受经房间隔 TMVR 杂交手术的患者和 354 例接受经心尖或经间隔 TMVR 的患者相关数据可用。SMVR 的结果通常报告为小病例系列(来自 11 项研究的 447 例患者);然而,最近有一项大型研究报告了 9551 例患者的结果。与接受 SMVR 的患者相比,接受 TMVR 的患者的中位随访时间更短(9 至 12 个月[范围,住院至 19 个月])。总体而言,接受 TMVR 的患者年龄更大,胸外科医生风险评分更高。SMVR 的早期(0%-27%;中位数 6.3%)和长期死亡率(0%-65%;中位数 1 年为 15.8%,5 年为 38.8%,10 年为 62.4%)范围很广。经间隔/经心尖 TMVR 的中位住院、30 天和 1 年死亡率分别为 16.7%、22.7%和 43%,经房间隔 TMVR 分别为 9.5%、20.0%和 40%。二尖瓣环钙化是一种复杂的疾病,TMVR 为解剖结构复杂的高危患者提供了经房间隔入路的灵活选择,为 SMVR 提供了一种有前途的替代方案。然而,需要进一步的研究来改进技术、患者选择、手术专业知识和长期结果。