Suppr超能文献

[创伤患者细胞免疫功能的动态变化及其与预后的关系]

[Dynamic changes of cellular immune function in trauma patients and its relationship with prognosis].

作者信息

Wang Jun, Wen Dalin, Zhong Huimin, Gan Lebin, Du Juan, Zhang Huacai, Du Dingyuan, Zeng Ling, Zhang Kejun, Jiang Jianxin, Zhang Anqiang, Deng Jin

机构信息

Department of Emergency Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, Guizhou, China.

State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Institute of Surgery Research, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400042, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Feb;33(2):223-228. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200902-00604.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the dynamic changes of cellular immune function in peripheral blood of trauma patients and its role in the evaluation of traumatic complications.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study design was conducted. Patients with blunt trauma admitted to Chongqing Emergency Medical Center from November 2019 to January 2020 were consecutively enrolled. The peripheral blood samples were collected at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 days after injury. The expressions of CD64, CD274, and CD279 on the surface of neutrophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes as well as CD3, CD4 and CD8 T lymphocyte subsets were measured by flow cytometry. The trauma patients were divided into different groups according to the injury severity score (ISS) and sepsis within 28 days after injury, respectively. The dynamic changes of cellular immune function in different time points after injury and differences between different groups were compared. Furthermore, the correlation with acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), and ISS were evaluated by Pearson correlation analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 42 patients with trauma were finally enrolled, containing 8 severe trauma patients with ISS greater than 25 scores, 17 patients with ISS between 16 and 25 scores, and 17 patients with ISS less than 16 scores. The sepsis morbidity rates were 14.3% (n = 6) within 28 days after injury. CD64 index and CD4 T lymphocyte subsets were significantly increased at different time points after trauma (H = 15.464, P = 0.004; F = 2.491, P = 0.035). The CD64 index and positive rates of CD279 in neutrophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes were increased with the severity of injury at day 1 and day 3 after injury, respectively. At the first day after injury, CD64 index were 2.81±1.79, 1.77±0.92, 3.49±1.09; positive rate of CD279 in neutrophils were 1.40% (0.32%, 2.04%), 0.95% (0.44%, 2.70%), 12.73% (3.00%, 25.20%); positive rate of CD279 in lymphocytes were 3.77% (3.04%, 5.15%), 4.71% (4.08%, 6.32%), 8.01% (4.59%, 11.59%); positive rate of CD279 in monocytes were 0.57% (0.24%, 1.09%), 0.85% (0.22%, 1.25%), 6.74% (2.61%, 18.94%) from mild to severe injury groups, respectively. The CD64 index in severe injury group was significantly higher than that in moderate group, and the positive rates of CD279 in neutrophils, lymphocytes and monocytes of severe injury patients were higher than those in other two groups (all P < 0.05). At 3rd day after injury, compared to moderate group, severe injury patients had significantly higher CD64 index and positive rate of CD279 in lymphocytes [4.58±2.41 vs. 2.43±1.68, 7.35% (5.90%, 12.28%) vs. 4.63% (3.26%, 6.06%), both P < 0.05]. Compared with the non-sepsis patients, the sepsis patients had significantly higher CD64 index and positive rate of CD279 in monocytes at day 1 after injury [4.06±1.72 vs. 2.36±1.31, 3.29% (1.14%, 12.84%) vs. 0.67% (0.25%, 1.48%), both P < 0.05], and positive rate of CD279 in lymphocytes significantly higher at 3rd day after injury [8.73% (7.52%, 15.82%) vs. 4.67% (3.82%, 6.21%), P < 0.05]. In addition, correlation analysis showed that positive rate of CD279 in lymphocytes was positively correlated with SOFA and ISS, respectively (r values were 0.533 and 0.394, both P < 0.05), positive rate of CD279 in monocytes was positively correlated with APACHE II, SOFA and ISS scores, respectively (r values were 0.579, 0.452 and 0.490, all P < 0.01), positive rate of CD279 in neutrophils was positively correlated with APACHE II and ISS, respectively (r values were 0.358 and 0.388, both P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

CD64 index and CD279 expression in neutrophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes are significantly related to the severity and prognosis of trauma. Dynamic monitoring the cellular immune function may be helpful for assessing the prognosis of trauma patients.

摘要

目的

研究创伤患者外周血细胞免疫功能的动态变化及其在创伤并发症评估中的作用。

方法

采用前瞻性队列研究设计。连续纳入2019年11月至2020年1月入住重庆急救医疗中心的钝性创伤患者。于伤后1、3、5、7和14天采集外周血样本。采用流式细胞术检测中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞和单核细胞表面CD64、CD274和CD279的表达以及CD3、CD4和CD8 T淋巴细胞亚群。创伤患者分别根据损伤严重程度评分(ISS)和伤后28天内是否发生脓毒症分为不同组。比较伤后不同时间点细胞免疫功能的动态变化及不同组间的差异。此外,通过Pearson相关分析评估其与急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)和ISS的相关性。

结果

最终纳入42例创伤患者,其中ISS大于25分的重度创伤患者8例,ISS在16至25分之间的患者17例,ISS小于16分的患者17例。伤后28天内脓毒症发病率为14.3%(n = 6)。创伤后不同时间点CD64指数和CD4 T淋巴细胞亚群显著升高(H = 15.464,P = 0.004;F = 2.491,P = 0.035)。伤后第1天和第3天,中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞和单核细胞中CD64指数和CD279阳性率分别随损伤严重程度增加。伤后第1天,轻度、中度、重度损伤组中性粒细胞CD64指数分别为2.81±1.79、1.77±0.92、3.49±1.09;中性粒细胞CD279阳性率分别为1.40%(0.32%,2.04%)、0.95%(0.44%,2.70%)、12.73%(3.00%,25.20%);淋巴细胞CD279阳性率分别为3.77%(3.04%,5.15%)、4.71%(4.08%,6.32%)、8.01%(4.59%,11.59%);单核细胞CD279阳性率分别为0.57%(0.24%,1.09%)、0.85%(0.22%,1.25%)、6.74%(2.61%,18.94%)。重度损伤组CD64指数显著高于中度组,重度损伤患者中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞和单核细胞中CD279阳性率高于其他两组(均P < 0.05)。伤后第3天,与中度组相比,重度损伤患者CD64指数和淋巴细胞CD279阳性率显著更高[4.58±2.41对2.43±1.68,7.35%(5.90%,12.28%)对4.63%(3.26%,6.06%),均P < 0.05]。与非脓毒症患者相比,脓毒症患者伤后第1天单核细胞CD64指数和CD279阳性率显著更高[4.06±1.72对2.36±1.31,3.29%(1.14%,12.84%)对0.67%(0.25%,1.48%),均P < 0.05],伤后第3天淋巴细胞CD279阳性率显著更高[8.73%(7.52%,15.82%)对4.67%(3.82%,6.21%),P < 0.05]。此外,相关分析显示,淋巴细胞CD279阳性率分别与SOFA和ISS呈正相关(r值分别为0.533和0.394,均P < 0.05),单核细胞CD279阳性率分别与APACHE II、SOFA和ISS评分呈正相关(r值分别为0.579、0.452和0.490,均P < 0.01),中性粒细胞CD279阳性率分别与APACHE II和ISS呈正相关(r值分别为0.358和0.388,均P < 0.05)。

结论

中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞和单核细胞中CD64指数及CD279表达与创伤的严重程度和预后显著相关。动态监测细胞免疫功能可能有助于评估创伤患者的预后。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验