Grupo de Estudo em Desempenho Aeróbio, Escola de Educação Física e Esporte, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Centro de Desportos, Departamento de Educação Física, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil.
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2021 Mar 15;54(5):e10693. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X202010693. eCollection 2021.
The present study compared the effects of a footwear designed to enhance energy return (thermoplastic polyurethane, TPU) vs minimalist shoes on running economy (RE) and endurance performance. In this counterbalanced and crossover design study, 11 recreational male runners performed two submaximal constant-speed running tests and two 3-km time-trials with the two shoe models. Oxygen uptake was measured during submaximal constant-speed running tests in order to determine the RE at 12 km/h and oxygen cost of running (CTO2) at individual average speed sustained during the 3-km running time-trials wearing either of the two shoes. Our results revealed that RE was improved (2.4%) with TPU shoes compared with minimalist shoes (P=0.01). However, there was no significant difference for CTO2 (P=0.61) and running performance (P=0.52) comparing the TPU (710±60 s) and the minimalist (718±63 s) shoe models. These novel findings demonstrate that shoes with enhanced mechanical energy return (i.e. TPU) produced a lower energy cost of running at low (i.e., 12 km/h) but not at high speeds (i.e., average speed sustained during the 3-km running time-trial, ∼15 km/h), ultimately resulting in similar running performance compared to the minimalist shoe.
本研究比较了一种旨在增强能量返回(热塑性聚氨酯,TPU)的鞋类与极简鞋对跑步经济性(RE)和耐力表现的影响。在这项平衡和交叉设计研究中,11 名男性休闲跑步者使用两种鞋型进行了两次亚最大速度恒定速度跑步测试和两次 3 公里计时赛。在亚最大速度恒定速度跑步测试中测量了耗氧量,以确定以 12km/h 的速度进行的 RE 以及在穿着两种鞋型中的任意一种进行 3 公里计时赛时维持的个人平均速度下的跑步氧气成本(CTO2)。我们的结果表明,与极简鞋相比,TPU 鞋可提高 RE(2.4%)(P=0.01)。然而,在 CTO2(P=0.61)和跑步表现(P=0.52)方面,TPU(710±60s)和极简鞋(718±63s)之间没有显着差异。这些新发现表明,具有增强的机械能返回(即 TPU)的鞋类在较低速度(即,12km/h)但在较高速度(即,3km 计时赛中维持的平均速度,约 15km/h)下可降低跑步的能量成本,最终与极简鞋相比,跑步表现相似。