• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

病因学研究的注意事项。

Points of attention when conducting etiological research.

机构信息

ERA-EDTA Registry, Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

CNR-IFC, Center of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Epidemiology of Renal Diseases and Hypertension, Reggio Calabria, Italy.

出版信息

Nephrology (Carlton). 2021 Sep;26(9):701-707. doi: 10.1111/nep.13875. Epub 2021 Mar 25.

DOI:10.1111/nep.13875
PMID:33729647
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8451743/
Abstract

Epidemiological studies often aim to investigate the causal contribution of a risk factor to a disease or other outcome. In etiological research, one is usually interested in the (biological) mechanism(s) underlying the studied relationship. Inappropriate conduct of an etiological study may have major implications for the correctness of the results and interpretation of the findings. Therefore, in this paper, we aim to describe step by step how etiological research should be carried out, together with its  common pitfalls. These steps involve finding and formulating a well-defined etiological research question, choosing an appropriate study design including a suitable comparison group, adequate modelling, and adequate reporting and interpretation of the results.

摘要

流行病学研究通常旨在调查风险因素对疾病或其他结果的因果贡献。在病因学研究中,人们通常对所研究关系背后的(生物学)机制感兴趣。病因学研究的不当实施可能对结果的正确性和研究结果的解释产生重大影响。因此,在本文中,我们旨在逐步描述如何进行病因学研究,以及常见的陷阱。这些步骤包括发现和制定一个明确的病因学研究问题,选择合适的研究设计,包括合适的对照组,适当的建模,以及对结果的适当报告和解释。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa9b/8451743/c4b74b8eef5c/NEP-26-701-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa9b/8451743/c4b74b8eef5c/NEP-26-701-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa9b/8451743/c4b74b8eef5c/NEP-26-701-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Points of attention when conducting etiological research.病因学研究的注意事项。
Nephrology (Carlton). 2021 Sep;26(9):701-707. doi: 10.1111/nep.13875. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
2
Prediction versus aetiology: common pitfalls and how to avoid them.预测与病因学:常见陷阱及规避方法。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017 Apr 1;32(suppl_2):ii1-ii5. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw459.
3
Testing for causality and prognosis: etiological and prognostic models.因果关系与预后检测:病因学与预后模型
Kidney Int. 2008 Dec;74(12):1512-5. doi: 10.1038/ki.2008.416. Epub 2008 Aug 20.
4
Prediction or causality? A scoping review of their conflation within current observational research.预测还是因果关系?当前观察性研究中混淆二者的范围综述。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2021 Sep;36(9):889-898. doi: 10.1007/s10654-021-00794-w. Epub 2021 Aug 15.
5
Overview of the epidemiology methods and applications: strengths and limitations of observational study designs.流行病学方法与应用概述:观察性研究设计的优势与局限性。
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2010;50 Suppl 1(s1):10-2. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2010.526838.
6
Causality in epidemiological research.流行病学研究中的因果关系。
Przegl Epidemiol. 2009;63(4):557-64.
7
[Roaming through methodology. IV. Causality].[方法论漫谈。IV. 因果关系]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1998 Aug 1;142(31):1765-7.
8
Conducting systematic reviews of association (etiology): The Joanna Briggs Institute's approach.进行关联性(病因学)的系统评价:乔安娜·布里格斯循证卫生保健中心的方法。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):163-9. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000064.
9
[Causal analysis approaches in epidemiology].[流行病学中的因果分析方法]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2014 Feb;62(1):53-63. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2013.09.002. Epub 2014 Jan 1.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating benefit from vitamin D supplementation: defining the area for treatment.评估补充维生素D的益处:确定治疗范围。
Osteoporos Int. 2023 Sep;34(9):1531-1533. doi: 10.1007/s00198-023-06802-x. Epub 2023 May 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence-based medicine-When observational studies are better than randomized controlled trials.循证医学——当观察性研究优于随机对照试验时。
Nephrology (Carlton). 2020 Oct;25(10):737-743. doi: 10.1111/nep.13742. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
2
Effect modification, interaction and mediation: an overview of theoretical insights for clinical investigators.效应修饰、交互作用和中介作用:临床研究者理论见解概述
Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Jun 8;9:331-338. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S129728. eCollection 2017.
3
Prediction versus aetiology: common pitfalls and how to avoid them.
预测与病因学:常见陷阱及规避方法。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017 Apr 1;32(suppl_2):ii1-ii5. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw459.
4
Clot Structure: A Potent Mortality Risk Factor in Patients on Hemodialysis.血栓结构:血液透析患者的一个强大死亡风险因素。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 May;28(5):1622-1630. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016030336. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
5
Mediation Analysis: A Practitioner's Guide.中介分析:实践者指南。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2016;37:17-32. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032315-021402. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
6
Asking the right question and finding the right answers.提出正确的问题并找到正确的答案。
Nephrology (Carlton). 2010 Feb;15(1):8-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2009.01264.x.
7
CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials.CONSORT 2010 声明:平行组随机试验报告的更新指南。
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jun 1;152(11):726-32. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
8
The analysis of survival data in nephrology: basic concepts and methods of Cox regression.肾脏病学中生存数据的分析:Cox回归的基本概念与方法
Kidney Int. 2008 Sep;74(6):705-9. doi: 10.1038/ki.2008.294. Epub 2008 Jul 2.
9
Linear and logistic regression analysis.线性和逻辑回归分析。
Kidney Int. 2008 Apr;73(7):806-10. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002787. Epub 2008 Jan 16.
10
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.《流行病学观察性研究报告强化(STROBE)声明》:观察性研究报告指南
Lancet. 2007 Oct 20;370(9596):1453-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X.