• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

配对的原发性和转移性肿瘤之间基因组差异的要素及进化决定因素。

Elements and evolutionary determinants of genomic divergence between paired primary and metastatic tumors.

作者信息

Sun Ruping, Nikolakopoulos Athanasios N

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.

Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Mar 17;17(3):e1008838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008838. eCollection 2021 Mar.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008838
PMID:33730105
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8007046/
Abstract

Can metastatic-primary (M-P) genomic divergence measured from next generation sequencing reveal the natural history of metastatic dissemination? This remains an open question of utmost importance in facilitating a deeper understanding of metastatic progression, and thereby, improving its prevention. Here, we utilize mathematical and computational modeling to tackle this question as well as to provide a framework that illuminates the fundamental elements and evolutionary determinants of M-P divergence. Our framework facilitates the integration of sequencing detectability of somatic variants, and hence, paves the way towards bridging the measurable between-tumor heterogeneity with analytical modeling and interpretability. We show that the number of somatic variants of the metastatic seeding cell that are experimentally undetectable in the primary tumor, can be characterized as the path of the phylogenetic tree from the last appearing variant of the seeding cell back to the most recent detectable variant. We find that the expected length of this path is principally determined by the decay in detectability of the variants along the seeding cell's lineage; and thus, exhibits a significant dependence on the underlying tumor growth dynamics. A striking implication of this fact, is that dissemination from an advanced detectable subclone of the primary tumor can lead to an abrupt drop in the expected measurable M-P divergence, thereby breaking the previously assumed monotonic relation between seeding time and M-P divergence. This is emphatically verified by our single cell-based spatial tumor growth simulation, where we find that M-P divergence exhibits a non-monotonic relationship with seeding time when the primary tumor grows under branched and linear evolution. On the other hand, a monotonic relationship holds when we condition on the dynamics of progressive diversification, or by restricting the seeding cells to always originate from undetectable subclones. Our results highlight the fact that a precise understanding of tumor growth dynamics is the sine qua non for exploiting M-P divergence to reconstruct the chronology of metastatic dissemination. The quantitative models presented here enable further careful evaluation of M-P divergence in association with crucial evolutionary and sequencing parameters.

摘要

通过下一代测序测量的转移灶-原发灶(M-P)基因组差异能否揭示转移扩散的自然史?这仍然是一个极其重要的开放性问题,对于深入理解转移进展并进而改善其预防具有重要意义。在此,我们利用数学和计算建模来解决这个问题,并提供一个框架,阐明M-P差异的基本要素和进化决定因素。我们的框架促进了体细胞变异测序可检测性的整合,从而为通过分析建模和可解释性弥合可测量的肿瘤间异质性铺平了道路。我们表明,在原发肿瘤中实验不可检测的转移播种细胞的体细胞变异数量,可以表征为从播种细胞的最后出现变异到最近可检测变异的系统发育树路径。我们发现,这条路径的预期长度主要由沿播种细胞谱系的变异可检测性衰减决定;因此,对潜在的肿瘤生长动力学有显著依赖性。这一事实的一个显著含义是,从原发肿瘤的晚期可检测亚克隆进行的扩散可能导致预期可测量的M-P差异突然下降,从而打破先前假设的播种时间与M-P差异之间的单调关系。我们基于单细胞的空间肿瘤生长模拟有力地证实了这一点,我们发现当原发肿瘤在分支和线性进化下生长时,M-P差异与播种时间呈现非单调关系。另一方面,当我们基于渐进多样化的动力学条件,或者将播种细胞限制为始终源自不可检测的亚克隆时,单调关系成立。我们的结果突出了这样一个事实,即精确理解肿瘤生长动力学是利用M-P差异重建转移扩散时间顺序的必要条件。这里提出的定量模型能够结合关键的进化和测序参数,对M-P差异进行进一步仔细评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35c9/8007046/0351cd71531e/pcbi.1008838.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35c9/8007046/812af8d7372c/pcbi.1008838.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35c9/8007046/2ec962429053/pcbi.1008838.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35c9/8007046/0f16a62be79b/pcbi.1008838.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35c9/8007046/a6b218ea4716/pcbi.1008838.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35c9/8007046/aafad36181d2/pcbi.1008838.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35c9/8007046/d94e6392af55/pcbi.1008838.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35c9/8007046/0351cd71531e/pcbi.1008838.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35c9/8007046/812af8d7372c/pcbi.1008838.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35c9/8007046/2ec962429053/pcbi.1008838.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35c9/8007046/0f16a62be79b/pcbi.1008838.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35c9/8007046/a6b218ea4716/pcbi.1008838.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35c9/8007046/aafad36181d2/pcbi.1008838.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35c9/8007046/d94e6392af55/pcbi.1008838.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35c9/8007046/0351cd71531e/pcbi.1008838.g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Elements and evolutionary determinants of genomic divergence between paired primary and metastatic tumors.配对的原发性和转移性肿瘤之间基因组差异的要素及进化决定因素。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Mar 17;17(3):e1008838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008838. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Multiregion whole-exome sequencing of matched primary and metastatic tumors revealed genomic heterogeneity and suggested polyclonal seeding in colorectal cancer metastasis.多区域全外显子组测序匹配的原发和转移肿瘤揭示了结直肠癌转移中的基因组异质性,并提示了多克隆播种。
Ann Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;28(9):2135-2141. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx278.
3
Characterization of Clonal Evolution in Microsatellite Unstable Metastatic Cancers through Multiregional Tumor Sequencing.通过多区域肿瘤测序对微卫星不稳定转移性癌症中的克隆进化进行特征描述。
Mol Cancer Res. 2021 Mar;19(3):465-474. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-19-0955. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
4
Rare subclonal sequencing of breast cancers indicates putative metastatic driver mutations are predominately acquired after dissemination.乳腺癌罕见亚克隆测序表明,假定的转移驱动突变主要是在播散后获得的。
Genome Med. 2024 Feb 6;16(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13073-024-01293-9.
5
Metastasis as an evolutionary process.转移作为一个进化过程。
Science. 2016 Apr 8;352(6282):169-75. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf2784.
6
Early and multiple origins of metastatic lineages within primary tumors.原发性肿瘤内转移谱系的早期和多源性起源。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Feb 23;113(8):2140-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1525677113. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
7
SubClonal Hierarchy Inference from Somatic Mutations: Automatic Reconstruction of Cancer Evolutionary Trees from Multi-region Next Generation Sequencing.从体细胞突变推断亚克隆层次结构:通过多区域下一代测序自动重建癌症进化树
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Oct 5;11(10):e1004416. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004416. eCollection 2015 Oct.
8
Comparative Genomic Profiling of Matched Primary and Metastatic Tumors in Renal Cell Carcinoma.比较肾细胞癌中配对原发和转移肿瘤的基因组图谱。
Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Dec;4(6):986-994. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.09.016. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
9
Evolutionary history of metastatic breast cancer reveals minimal seeding from axillary lymph nodes.转移性乳腺癌的进化史揭示了来自腋窝淋巴结的少量播种。
J Clin Invest. 2018 Apr 2;128(4):1355-1370. doi: 10.1172/JCI96149. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
10
Spatio-Temporal Genomic Heterogeneity, Phylogeny, and Metastatic Evolution in Salivary Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma.涎腺腺样囊性癌的时空基因组异质性、系统发育及转移演变
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 Oct 1;109(10). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx033.

引用本文的文献

1
Modeling metastatic progression from cross-sectional cancer genomics data.基于癌症基因组学横断面数据建立转移进展模型。
Bioinformatics. 2024 Jun 28;40(Suppl 1):i140-i150. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae250.

本文引用的文献

1
Spatial structure governs the mode of tumour evolution.空间结构决定肿瘤演化模式。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2022 Feb;6(2):207-217. doi: 10.1038/s41559-021-01615-9. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
2
A mathematical model of the metastatic bottleneck predicts patient outcome and response to cancer treatment.转移性瓶颈的数学模型可预测患者的预后和对癌症治疗的反应。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Oct 2;16(10):e1008056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008056. eCollection 2020 Oct.
3
Subclonal reconstruction of tumors by using machine learning and population genetics.
利用机器学习和群体遗传学进行肿瘤亚克隆重建。
Nat Genet. 2020 Sep;52(9):898-907. doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-0675-5. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
4
The clonal evolution of metastatic colorectal cancer.转移性结直肠癌的克隆进化。
Sci Adv. 2020 Jun 10;6(24):eaay9691. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aay9691. eCollection 2020 Jun.
5
Lymph node metastases develop through a wider evolutionary bottleneck than distant metastases.淋巴结转移比远处转移经历更广泛的进化瓶颈。
Nat Genet. 2020 Jul;52(7):692-700. doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-0633-2. Epub 2020 May 25.
6
Cancer Genome Evolutionary Trajectories in Metastasis.转移中的癌症基因组进化轨迹。
Cancer Cell. 2020 Jan 13;37(1):8-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.12.004.
7
Multi-regional sequencing reveals clonal and polyclonal seeding from primary tumor to metastases in advanced gastric cancer.多区域测序揭示晚期胃癌原发肿瘤至转移灶的克隆和多克隆播种。
J Gastroenterol. 2020 May;55(5):553-564. doi: 10.1007/s00535-019-01659-6. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
8
The mutational footprints of cancer therapies.癌症治疗的突变足迹。
Nat Genet. 2019 Dec;51(12):1732-1740. doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0525-5. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
9
Inferring Tumor Proliferative Organization from Phylogenetic Tree Measures in a Computational Model.从计算模型的系统发育树测度推断肿瘤增殖组织。
Syst Biol. 2020 Jul 1;69(4):623-637. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syz070.
10
Does early metastatic seeding occur in colorectal cancer?
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Nov;16(11):651-653. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0200-4.