Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong (SAR).
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2021 Nov;31(6):724-741. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12788. Epub 2021 May 6.
Conventional methods of oral health education (OHE) are not suitable for children with visual impairment, as these methods usually involve visual demonstration with models or plaque-disclosing dyes.
To systematically review the literature to support the best approach for providing OHE to children and adolescents with visual impairment.
A systematic search of five electronic databases and grey literature was conducted. Randomized controlled trials that compared different OHE methods in children and adolescents with visual impairment were included. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2) was used for the risk-of-bias assessment. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework was used to determine the certainty of evidence.
Nine randomized controlled trials with a total of 804 participants were included in this review. Seven OHE methods were compared. Seven studies were assessed to be at high risk of bias, one study was assessed to have some concerns, and one study was assessed to be at low risk of bias. The overall certainty of evidence was very low according to GRADE.
There was insufficient evidence to recommend a particular method of OHE as more effective in improving the oral hygiene of children with visual impairment, but combination methods may show similar or better results.
传统的口腔健康教育(OHE)方法并不适用于视力障碍的儿童,因为这些方法通常涉及使用模型或菌斑显色剂进行视觉演示。
系统回顾文献,以支持为视力障碍的儿童和青少年提供最佳口腔健康教育方法。
对五个电子数据库和灰色文献进行了系统检索。纳入了比较不同 OHE 方法在视力障碍的儿童和青少年中的随机对照试验。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具(RoB 2)进行偏倚风险评估。使用推荐评估、制定与评价分级(GRADE)框架来确定证据的确定性。
本综述共纳入了 9 项随机对照试验,共计 804 名参与者。比较了 7 种 OHE 方法。7 项研究被评估为高偏倚风险,1 项研究被评估为存在一些关注,1 项研究被评估为低偏倚风险。根据 GRADE,总体证据确定性非常低。
没有足够的证据可以推荐某种特定的 OHE 方法更有效地改善视力障碍儿童的口腔卫生,但联合方法可能显示出相似或更好的效果。