Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Health Sciences Department, Faculty of Science, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada; and Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Rural Remote Health. 2021 Mar;21(1):6203. doi: 10.22605/RRH6203. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
Many Indigenous peoples around the world are disproportionately affected by mental health challenges, due to intergenerational and collective trauma stemming from historical losses and ongoing colonialism. A growing body of literature suggests that mental wellness initiatives are more culturally safe and result in more successful and sustainable outcomes when they are developed by, for and with Indigenous communities using community-driven approaches that prioritize and privilege Indigenous leadership, knowledge systems, beliefs and practices. However, knowledge has not been synthesized on mental wellness initiatives and the extent of community engagement during the development, implementation, and evaluation stages of these initiatives.
The authors conducted a scoping review of studies on Indigenous community-based mental wellness initiatives to identify the (1) characteristics of these initiatives, (2) types of evaluation approaches (specific measures and assessment tools), (3) level of community engagement from inception to the evaluation stage of the initiative, and (4) lessons learned as identified by the authors. Published and grey literature were searched across several electronic databases. Inclusion criteria required that each study was published between January 2008 and June 2018, focused on Indigenous peoples and their communities in Canada, USA, Australia, and/or New Zealand, focused on a community-based mental wellness initiative, was meaningfully co-led or co-designed by the community, described the initiative and how it was evaluated, and was printed in English.
The search yielded 1491 unique articles, and 22 of these articles met all of the inclusion criteria. All included studies took place in Canada, the USA, or Australia. Most mental wellness initiatives addressed general mental wellness, substance use, suicide prevention, and/or co-occurring conditions, and many were tailored for Indigenous youth. Culture-based initiatives were emphasized in most studies, with cultural adaptation and relevance prioritized in all initiatives. Approaches to evaluation ranged from process evaluations to outcome evaluations. Most studies used a mixed methods approach and a wide range of assessment tools, including questionnaires and indicators of community capacity building. Many evaluations used a shared leadership model between community leaders and researchers and had combinations of community members, families, Elders, Knowledge Keepers, and leaders involved in the development, implementation, and evaluation of the mental wellness initiative. Common challenges in conducting evaluation research included limitations of funding structures and the burden on community staff and leaders during the project.
Overall, across all studies, culture stood out as a major theme for community-based mental wellness initiatives among rural and remote Indigenous communities, with cultural teachings, cultural activities, appropriate use of culture, land-based programming and knowledge sharing integrated into community programming. However, culture and Indigenous leadership throughout were lacking in many of the research studies. Thus, as more Indigenous communities and leaders govern and guide the development of evidence-based mental wellness programming, culture as a form of healing needs to be incorporated into the development of the program, and culture should be a core competency in any evaluation research.
由于历史损失和持续的殖民主义导致的代际和集体创伤,世界上许多土著人民都受到心理健康挑战的不成比例的影响。越来越多的文献表明,当心理健康倡议由土著社区通过以社区为导向的方法来制定、实施和评估时,这些倡议更具有文化安全性,并能取得更成功和可持续的成果,这些方法优先考虑和重视土著领导、知识体系、信仰和实践。然而,对于土著社区为基础的心理健康倡议,以及在这些倡议的制定、实施和评估阶段社区参与的程度,尚未对相关知识进行综合。
作者对基于社区的土著心理健康倡议进行了范围界定审查,以确定:(1)这些倡议的特征;(2)评估方法的类型(具体措施和评估工具);(3)从倡议开始到评估阶段的社区参与程度;(4)作者确定的经验教训。在几个电子数据库中搜索了已发表和灰色文献。纳入标准要求每项研究均于 2008 年 1 月至 2018 年 6 月发表,以加拿大、美国、澳大利亚和/或新西兰的土著人民及其社区为重点,以基于社区的心理健康倡议为重点,由社区有意义地共同领导或共同设计,描述倡议及其评估方式,并以英文出版。
搜索产生了 1491 篇独特的文章,其中 22 篇符合所有纳入标准。所有纳入的研究都发生在加拿大、美国或澳大利亚。大多数心理健康倡议针对一般心理健康、药物使用、自杀预防和/或共病,并且许多都针对土著青年。大多数研究强调了基于文化的倡议,所有倡议都优先考虑文化适应和相关性。评估方法从过程评估到结果评估不等。大多数研究采用了混合方法,使用了广泛的评估工具,包括问卷和社区能力建设指标。许多评估采用了社区领导和研究人员之间的共同领导模式,并将社区成员、家庭、长者、知识守护者和领导人结合在一起,参与心理健康倡议的制定、实施和评估。在进行评估研究时,常见的挑战包括资金结构的限制以及项目期间对社区工作人员和领导人的负担。
总体而言,在所有研究中,文化作为农村和偏远土著社区基于社区的心理健康倡议的一个主要主题脱颖而出,将文化教学、文化活动、适当使用文化、基于土地的规划和知识共享融入社区规划。然而,许多研究都缺乏文化和土著领导。因此,随着越来越多的土著社区和领导人管理和指导循证心理健康方案的制定,作为一种治疗形式的文化需要纳入方案的制定,任何评估研究都应将文化作为核心能力。