Commentary on: The effects of coding intensity in Medicare advantage on plan benefits and finances.
作者信息
Newhouse Joseph P
机构信息
Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
出版信息
Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr;56(2):175-177. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13639.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Commentary on: The effects of coding intensity in Medicare advantage on plan benefits and finances.关于《医疗保险优势中的编码强度对计划福利和财务的影响》的评论
Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr;56(2):175-177. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13639.
2
The effects of coding intensity in Medicare Advantage on plan benefits and finances.医疗保险优势计划中编码强度对计划福利和财务的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr;56(2):178-187. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13591. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
3
Home health agency benefits.家庭健康机构福利。
Health Care Financ Rev Annu Suppl. 1992:125-48.
4
Correct coding edits caused Medicare claims denials for revised debridement codes.正确的编码编辑导致医疗保险索赔因修订后的清创代码被拒付。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2011 Jun;24(6):251-2, 254-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000398672.89400.97.
5
Skilled nursing facilities.专业护理机构
Health Care Financ Rev Annu Suppl. 1992:97-123.
6
Multiple prior years of health expenditures and Medicare health plan choice.多年的医疗支出及医疗保险计划选择情况。
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2004 Sep;4(3):247-61. doi: 10.1023/B:IHFE.0000036049.40865.72.
7
The Cost of Medicare Advantage.医疗保险优势计划的成本。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 14;315(22):2387-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6790.
8
Paying more for less? Insurer competition and health plan generosity in the Medicare Advantage program.花钱更少，享受更多？医疗保险优势计划中的保险公司竞争与医保计划慷慨性。
J Health Econ. 2018 Sep;61:77-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
9
Medicaid Expenditures and Estimated Rebates for Epinephrine Autoinjectors, 2012 to 2016.2012 年至 2016 年，肾上腺素自动注射器的医疗补助支出和估计退款。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 May 1;177(5):734-736. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0257.
10
Medicare Advantage for All, Perhaps?全民医保优势计划，有可能吗？
JAMA. 2020 Oct 6;324(13):1275-1276. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.17512.
引用本文的文献
1
Coding Intensity Through Health Risk Assessments and Chart Reviews in Medicare Advantage: Does It Explain Resource Use?医疗保险优势计划中的健康风险评估和图表审查的编码强度：它能否解释资源利用情况？
Med Care Res Rev. 2023 Dec;80(6):641-647. doi: 10.1177/10775587231191169. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
本文引用的文献
1
The effects of coding intensity in Medicare Advantage on plan benefits and finances.医疗保险优势计划中编码强度对计划福利和财务的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr;56(2):178-187. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13591. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
2
Adjusted Mortality Rates Are Lower For Medicare Advantage Than Traditional Medicare, But The Rates Converge Over Time.调整后的死亡率在医疗保险优势计划中低于传统医疗保险，但随着时间的推移，这些比率趋于一致。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Apr;38(4):554-560. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05390.
3
Do Larger Health Insurance Subsidies Benefit Patients or Producers? Evidence from Medicare Advantage.更大的医疗保险补贴是有利于患者还是生产者？来自 Medicare Advantage 的证据。
Am Econ Rev. 2018 Aug;108(8):2048-87.
4
Projected Coding Intensity In Medicare Advantage Could Increase Medicare Spending By $200 Billion Over Ten Years.预计医疗保险优势计划中的编码强度可能会在十年内使医疗保险支出增加 2000 亿美元。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Feb 1;36(2):320-327. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0768.
5
Measuring coding intensity in the Medicare Advantage program.衡量医疗保险优势计划中的编码强度。
Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2014 Jul 17;4(2). doi: 10.5600/mmrr2014-004-02-a06. eCollection 2014.
6
Competitive bidding in Medicare Advantage: effect of benchmark changes on plan bids.医疗保险优势计划中的竞争性投标：基准变化对计划投标的影响。
J Health Econ. 2013 Dec;32(6):1301-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.09.004.
7
How much change in the case mix index is DRG creep?病例组合指数的多大变化属于疾病诊断相关分组（DRG） creep？
J Health Econ. 1990;9(4):411-28. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(90)90003-l.
Zotero 插件