ASU, U of AZ, Creighton, Valleywise Medical Center, University of Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona.
Nabriva Therapeutics US, Inc., King of Prussia, Pennsylvania.
J Emerg Med. 2021 Jun;60(6):781-792. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.02.001. Epub 2021 Mar 14.
Safe and effective oral antibiotics are needed for outpatient management of moderate to severe community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP).
We describe a post-hoc analysis of adults with CABP managed as outpatients from the Lefamulin Evaluation Against Pneumonia (LEAP) 2 double-blind, noninferiority, phase 3 clinical trial.
LEAP 2 compared the efficacy and safety of oral lefamulin 600 mg every 12 h (5 days) vs. oral moxifloxacin 400 mg every 24 h (7 days) in adults (inpatients and outpatients) with Pneumonia Outcomes Research Team (PORT) risk classes II‒IV.
Overall, 41% (151 of 368) of patients receiving lefamulin and 43% (159 of 368) of patients receiving moxifloxacin started treatment as outpatients-44% and 40%, respectively, were PORT risk class III/IV, and 21% in both groups had CURB-65 scores of 2‒3. Early clinical response (at 96 ± 24 h) and investigator assessment of clinical response success rates at test of cure (5‒10 days after last study drug dose) were high and similar in both groups among all (lefamulin, 91% vs. moxifloxacin, 89‒90%), PORT risk class III/IV (89‒91% vs. 88‒91%), and CURB-65 score 2‒3 (87‒90% vs. 82‒88%) outpatients. Few outpatients (lefamulin, 2.6%; moxifloxacin, 2.5%) discontinued the study drug because of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). No outpatient in the lefamulin group was hospitalized for a TEAE, compared with 5 patients (3%), including two deaths, in the moxifloxacin group.
These data suggest that 5 days of oral lefamulin can be given in lieu of fluoroquinolones for outpatient treatment of adults with CABP and PORT risk class III/IV or CURB-65 scores of 2‒3.
需要安全有效的口服抗生素来治疗门诊中度至重度社区获得性细菌性肺炎(CABP)。
我们描述了 Lefamulin 评估社区获得性细菌性肺炎 2 期(LEAP2)双盲、非劣效性、3 期临床试验中,门诊治疗 CABP 成人患者的事后分析。
LEAP2 比较了口服 lefamulin 600mg 每 12 小时(5 天)与口服莫西沙星 400mg 每 24 小时(7 天)治疗肺炎结局研究小组(PORT)风险分类 II-IV 级的成人(住院和门诊患者)的疗效和安全性。
总体而言,41%(151/368)接受 lefamulin治疗的患者和 43%(159/368)接受莫西沙星治疗的患者开始作为门诊患者治疗-44%和 40%分别为 PORT 风险分类 III/IV,两组均有 21%的 CURB-65 评分为 2-3。两组患者在治疗开始后 96±24 小时时的早期临床反应和治疗结束后 5-10 天的临床反应成功率评估(最后一次研究药物剂量后)均较高且相似,均为 91%(lefamulin)和 89-90%(moxifloxacin);在 PORT 风险分类 III/IV 患者(91%-91%)和 CURB-65 评分为 2-3 患者(87%-90%)中也是如此。少数门诊患者(lefamulin,2.6%;moxifloxacin,2.5%)因治疗期间出现不良事件(TEAE)而停止研究药物治疗。与莫西沙星组的 5 例(3%)相比,包括 2 例死亡, lefamulin 组无门诊患者因 TEAE 住院。
这些数据表明,对于门诊治疗 CABP 成人患者,以及 PORT 风险分类 III/IV 或 CURB-65 评分为 2-3 的患者,5 天口服 lefamulin 可替代氟喹诺酮类药物。