Suppr超能文献

截短侧耳素类抗生素静脉至口服给药的来法莫林治疗社区获得性细菌性肺炎的疗效和安全性:III期来法莫林抗肺炎评估(LEAP 1)试验

Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous-to-oral Lefamulin, a Pleuromutilin Antibiotic, for the Treatment of Community-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia: The Phase III Lefamulin Evaluation Against Pneumonia (LEAP 1) Trial.

作者信息

File Thomas M, Goldberg Lisa, Das Anita, Sweeney Carolyn, Saviski John, Gelone Steven P, Seltzer Elyse, Paukner Susanne, Wicha Wolfgang W, Talbot George H, Gasink Leanne B

机构信息

Summa Health, Akron, Ohio.

Nabriva Therapeutics US, Inc., King of Prussia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Nov 13;69(11):1856-1867. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz090.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lefamulin, a pleuromutilin antibiotic, is active against pathogens commonly causing community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). The Lefamulin Evaluation Against Pneumonia (LEAP 1) study was a global noninferiority trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lefamulin for the treatment of CABP.

METHODS

In this double-blind study, adults with CABP of Pneumonia Outcomes Research Team risk class ≥III were randomized 1:1 to receive lefamulin at 150 mg intravenously (IV) every 12 hours or moxifloxacin at 400 mg IV every 24 hours. After 6 doses, patients could be switched to an oral study drug if prespecified improvement criteria were met. If methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was suspected, either linezolid or placebo was added to moxifloxacin or lefamulin, respectively. The US Food and Drug Administration primary endpoint was an early clinical response (ECR) 96 ± 24 hours after the first dose of the study drug in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (noninferiority margin, 12.5%). The European Medicines Agency co-primary endpoints were an investigator assessment of clinical response (IACR) 5-10 days after the last dose of the study drug in the modified ITT (mITT) and clinically evaluable (CE) populations (noninferiority margin, 10%).

RESULTS

There were 551 patients randomized (n = 276 lefamulin; n = 275 moxifloxacin). Lefamulin was noninferior to moxifloxacin for ECR (87.3% vs 90.2%, respectively; difference -2.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] g -8.5 to 2.8) and IACR (mITT, 81.7% vs 84.2%, respectively; difference -2.6%, 95% CI -8.9 to 3.9; CE, 86.9% vs 89.4%, respectively; difference -2.5%, 95% CI -8.4 to 3.4). Rates of study drug discontinuation due to treatment-emergent adverse events were 2.9% for lefamulin and 4.4% for moxifloxacin.

CONCLUSIONS

Lefamulin was noninferior to moxifloxacin for the primary efficacy endpoints and was generally safe and well tolerated.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT02559310.

摘要

背景

来法莫林是一种截短侧耳素类抗生素,对常见的社区获得性细菌性肺炎(CABP)病原体具有活性。来法莫林治疗肺炎评估(LEAP 1)研究是一项全球非劣效性试验,旨在评估来法莫林治疗CABP的疗效和安全性。

方法

在这项双盲研究中,肺炎结局研究团队风险等级≥III的CABP成年患者按1:1随机分组,每12小时静脉注射(IV)150 mg来法莫林或每24小时IV注射400 mg莫西沙星。6剂后,如果符合预先设定的改善标准,患者可改用口服研究药物。如果怀疑有耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染,则分别在莫西沙星或来法莫林中添加利奈唑胺或安慰剂。美国食品药品监督管理局的主要终点是在意向性治疗(ITT)人群中,首次服用研究药物后96±24小时的早期临床反应(ECR)(非劣效界值为12.5%)。欧洲药品管理局的共同主要终点是在改良ITT(mITT)和临床可评估(CE)人群中,最后一剂研究药物后5 - 10天的研究者评估的临床反应(IACR)(非劣效界值为10%)。

结果

共有551例患者随机分组(来法莫林组n = 276;莫西沙星组n = 275)。来法莫林在ECR方面不劣于莫西沙星(分别为87.3%和90.2%;差异 -2.9%,95%置信区间[CI]为 -8.5至2.8)和IACR(mITT分别为81.7%和84.2%;差异 -2.6%,95% CI为 -8.9至3.9;CE分别为86.9%和89.4%;差异 -2.5%,95% CI为 -8.4至3.4)。因治疗中出现的不良事件而停用研究药物的发生率,来法莫林组为2.9%,莫西沙星组为4.4%。

结论

来法莫林在主要疗效终点方面不劣于莫西沙星,且总体安全且耐受性良好。

临床试验注册

NCT02559310。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41df/6853694/25feea3aa768/ciz090f0001.jpg

相似文献

4
Lefamulin vs moxifloxacin for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 17;99(29):e21223. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021223.
6
Lefamulin: The First Systemic Pleuromutilin Antibiotic.
Ann Pharmacother. 2020 Dec;54(12):1203-1214. doi: 10.1177/1060028020932521. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
9
Lefamulin: Review of a Promising Novel Pleuromutilin Antibiotic.
Pharmacotherapy. 2018 Sep;38(9):935-946. doi: 10.1002/phar.2166. Epub 2018 Aug 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Nephrotoxicity of New Antibiotics: A Systematic Review.
Toxics. 2025 Jul 19;13(7):606. doi: 10.3390/toxics13070606.
2
Static vs. cidal: it's not complex; it's simply incorrect.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2025 Aug 6;69(8):e0051325. doi: 10.1128/aac.00513-25. Epub 2025 Jul 21.
6
Guidelines for Antibiotics Prescription in Critically Ill Patients.
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Aug;28(Suppl 2):S104-S216. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24677. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
7
Treatment of MRSA Infection: Where are We?
Curr Med Chem. 2024;31(28):4425-4460. doi: 10.2174/0109298673249381231130111352.
8
Target attainment of intravenous lefamulin for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2024 Feb 1;79(2):443-446. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkad401.
9
Advancements in the Management of Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.
Cureus. 2023 Oct 12;15(10):e46893. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46893. eCollection 2023 Oct.
10
The catechol moiety of obafluorin is essential for antibacterial activity.
RSC Chem Biol. 2023 Aug 21;4(11):926-941. doi: 10.1039/d3cb00127j. eCollection 2023 Nov 1.

本文引用的文献

3
Antimicrobial Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae: Prevalence, Mechanisms, and Clinical Implications.
Am J Ther. 2017 May;24(3):e361-e369. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000551.
7
Mycoplasma pneumoniae: Current Knowledge on Macrolide Resistance and Treatment.
Front Microbiol. 2016 Jun 22;7:974. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00974. eCollection 2016.
9
Comprehensive Molecular Testing for Respiratory Pathogens in Community-Acquired Pneumonia.
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Apr 1;62(7):817-823. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ1214. Epub 2016 Jan 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验