Université de Bordeaux, INRAE, Mycoplasmal and Chlamydial Infections in Humans, Bordeaux, France.
CHU Bordeaux, Bacteriology Department, National Reference Center for Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Infections, Bordeaux, France.
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 May 19;59(6). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00020-21.
The increasing frequency of macrolide resistance is an emerging issue in the treatment of infection. Because evaluation of new commercial kits detecting and macrolide resistance is needed, we evaluated the performance and handling characteristics of the Allplex MG & AziR (Seegene), the Macrolide-R/MG ELITe MGB (ELITechGroup), and the ResistancePlus MG FleXible (SpeeDx-Cepheid) kits in comparison with those of an in-house real-time PCR and 23S rRNA gene sequencing used as the reference. A total of 239 urogenital specimens (135 -positive and 104 -negative specimens) collected between April and December 2019 at the French National Reference Center for Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Infections were assessed. The overall agreement for detection of the three commercial kits compared with the in-house real-time PCR was 94.6 to 97.6%, and there was no significant difference. A total of 97 specimens were found to be positive with the three kits and were used to assess macrolide resistance detection. The clinical sensitivities for resistance detection were 74.5% (95% confidence interval, 61.7 to 84.2%), 96.2% (87.2 to 99.0%), and 92.8% (82.7 to 97.1%) for the Allplex MG & AziR, Macrolide-R/MG ELITe MGB, and ResistancePlus MG FleXible kits, respectively. The sensitivity of the Macrolide-R/MG ELITe MGB kit was significantly higher than that of the Allplex MG & AziR kit. The clinical specificity for resistance detection of the three kits was 97.4 to 97.6%. The random-access possibility, input sample volume, and DNA extract availability for detecting resistance to other antibiotics may also influence the selection of a commercial kit by diagnostic laboratories.
大环内酯类耐药性的发生率不断增加,是感染治疗中一个新出现的问题。由于需要评估新的商业试剂盒检测和大环内酯类耐药性,因此我们评估了 Allplex MG & AziR(Seegene)、Macrolide-R/MG ELITe MGB(ELITechGroup)和 ResistancePlus MG FleXible(SpeeDx-Cepheid)试剂盒的性能和操作特点,并将其与作为参考的内部实时 PCR 和 23S rRNA 基因测序进行了比较。共评估了 2019 年 4 月至 12 月期间在法国国家细菌性性传播感染参考中心收集的 239 份泌尿生殖道标本(135 份阳性和 104 份阴性标本)。与内部实时 PCR 相比,三种商业试剂盒检测的总符合率为 94.6%至 97.6%,无显著差异。用三种试剂盒共发现 97 份标本呈阳性,用于评估大环内酯类耐药性检测。耐药检测的临床灵敏度分别为 Allplex MG & AziR 试剂盒 74.5%(95%置信区间,61.7%至 84.2%)、Macrolide-R/MG ELITe MGB 试剂盒 96.2%(87.2%至 99.0%)和 ResistancePlus MG FleXible 试剂盒 92.8%(82.7%至 97.1%)。Macrolide-R/MG ELITe MGB 试剂盒的灵敏度明显高于 Allplex MG & AziR 试剂盒。三种试剂盒耐药检测的临床特异性为 97.4%至 97.6%。检测其他抗生素耐药性的随机访问可能性、输入样本量和 DNA 提取可用性也可能影响诊断实验室对商业试剂盒的选择。