Suppr超能文献

旋磨术后严重钙化及大冠状动脉中药物洗脱支架与普通球囊血管成形术的比较。

Comparison of Drug-Eluting Stent and Plain Old Balloon Angioplasty After Rotational Atherectomy in Severe Calcified and Large Coronary.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences.

Sapporo Heart Center, Sapporo Cardio Vascular Clinic.

出版信息

Int Heart J. 2021 Mar 30;62(2):264-273. doi: 10.1536/ihj.20-538. Epub 2021 Mar 17.

Abstract

Drug-eluting stent (DES) is well known to be effective in severely calcified lesion after rotational atherectomy (ROTA). However, there are still some situations when stents should be avoided and plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) should be the preferred option. The present study aims to explore whether POBA is comparably effective to DES in large and calcified coronary pretreated by ROTA in clinical outcomes.Consecutive patients treated for severely calcified lesions in the large (≥ 3 mm) coronary using ROTA + DES or ROTA + POBA were retrospectively analyzed. The major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including all-cause/cardiac death and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 1 year and 2 years posttreatment, were compared between groups using the Cox regression analysis to identify independent predictors of TLR and MACE.The analysis included 285 cases in the ROTA + DES group and 47 cases in the ROTA + POBA group, without relevant differences in clinical baseline characteristics. Of note, lesion length was greater in the ROTA + DES group (37.2 versus 19.3 mm, P < 0.001); the ROTA + DES group had a higher rate of chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions, with 8.4%, and the ROTA + POBA group had none. The inhospital/30-day mortality rate (5.3%, ROTA + DES; 6.4%, ROTA + POBA) and the 12- and 24-month all-cause/cardiac mortality rate (9.3%, ROTA + DES; 7.7%, ROTA + POBA) were not significantly different between the two groups. TLR rates were not significantly different between the two groups at 12 (4.6%, ROTA + DES; 4.3%, ROTA + POBA) and 24 (5.3%, ROTA + DES; 6.4%, ROTA + POBA) months.Outcomes were comparable for ROTA + DES and ROTA + POBA in severely calcified large coronary artery intervention with respect to midterm death or TLR rate, especially for short lesion of < 20 mm.

摘要

药物洗脱支架(DES)在经旋磨后的严重钙化病变中效果显著。然而,在某些情况下,支架的应用应该被避免,而单纯的球囊血管成形术(POBA)应该是首选。本研究旨在探讨在经旋磨预处理的大且钙化的冠状动脉病变中,POBA 与 DES 的临床疗效是否相当。

回顾性分析了使用旋磨+DES 或旋磨+POBA 治疗严重钙化病变(大血管病变,≥3mm)的连续患者。采用 Cox 回归分析比较两组患者的主要不良心脏事件(MACE),包括治疗后 1 年和 2 年的全因/心源性死亡和靶病变血运重建(TLR),以确定 TLR 和 MACE 的独立预测因素。

该分析纳入了 285 例旋磨+DES 组患者和 47 例旋磨+POBA 组患者,两组患者的临床基线特征无显著差异。值得注意的是,旋磨+DES 组的病变长度更大(37.2mm 比 19.3mm,P<0.001);旋磨+DES 组的慢性完全闭塞(CTO)病变比例更高,为 8.4%,而旋磨+POBA 组没有。两组住院/30 天死亡率(旋磨+DES 组为 5.3%,旋磨+POBA 组为 6.4%)和 12 个月和 24 个月全因/心源性死亡率(旋磨+DES 组为 9.3%,旋磨+POBA 组为 7.7%)无显著差异。两组在 12 个月(旋磨+DES 组为 4.6%,旋磨+POBA 组为 4.3%)和 24 个月(旋磨+DES 组为 5.3%,旋磨+POBA 组为 6.4%)的 TLR 发生率也无显著差异。

在经旋磨预处理的大冠状动脉严重钙化病变的介入治疗中,旋磨+DES 和旋磨+POBA 的中期死亡或 TLR 率相当,尤其是病变长度<20mm 的患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验