Suppr超能文献

沙库巴曲缬沙坦在射血分数降低的日本慢性心力衰竭患者中的疗效和安全性 - 来自 PARALLEL-HF 研究的结果。

Efficacy and Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Japanese Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction - Results From the PARALLEL-HF Study.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University.

Saitama Citizens Medical Center.

出版信息

Circ J. 2021 Apr 23;85(5):584-594. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0854. Epub 2021 Mar 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the Prospective Comparison of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) With ACEi to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure (PARADIGM-HF) study, treatment with sacubitril/valsartan reduced the primary outcome of cardiovascular (CV) death and heart failure (HF) hospitalization compared with enalapril in patients with chronic HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). A prospective randomized trial was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in Japanese HFrEF patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In the Prospective comparison of ARNI with ACEi to determine the noveL beneficiaL trEatment vaLue in Japanese Heart Failure patients (PARALLEL-HF) study, 225 Japanese HFrEF patients (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class II-IV, left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≤35%) were randomized (1 : 1) to receive sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg bid or enalapril 10 mg bid. Over a median follow up of 33.9 months, no significant between-group difference was observed for the primary composite outcome of CV death and HF hospitalization (HR 1.09; 95% CI 0.65-1.82; P=0.6260). Early and sustained reductions in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) from baseline were observed with sacubitril/valsartan compared with enalapril (between-group difference: Week 2: 25.7%, P<0.01; Month 6: 18.9%, P=0.01, favoring sacubitril/valsartan). There was no significant difference in the changes in NYHA class and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) clinical summary score at Week 8 and Month 6. Sacubitril/valsartan was well tolerated with fewer study drug discontinuations due to adverse events, although the sacubitril/valsartan group had a higher proportion of patients with hypotension.

CONCLUSIONS

In Japanese patients with HFrEF, there was no difference in reduction in the risk of CV death or HF hospitalization between sacubitril/valsartan and enalapril, and sacubitril/valsartan was safe and well tolerated.

摘要

背景

在血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂(ARNI)与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi)治疗心力衰竭患者的前瞻性比较(PARADIGM-HF)研究中,与依那普利相比,沙库巴曲缬沙坦可降低慢性射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者的主要心血管(CV)死亡和心力衰竭(HF)住院复合终点。一项前瞻性随机试验旨在评估沙库巴曲缬沙坦在日本 HFrEF 患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法和结果

在评估 ARNI 与 ACEi 在日本心力衰竭患者中的新型治疗获益的前瞻性比较(PARALLEL-HF)研究中,225 例日本 HFrEF 患者(纽约心脏协会[NYHA]心功能 II-IV 级,左心室射血分数[LVEF]≤35%)按 1:1 随机分为沙库巴曲缬沙坦 200 mg 每日两次或依那普利 10 mg 每日两次。中位随访 33.9 个月,CV 死亡和 HF 住院的主要复合终点无显著组间差异(HR 1.09;95%CI 0.65-1.82;P=0.6260)。与依那普利相比,沙库巴曲缬沙坦可早期和持续降低 N 末端脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)基线水平(组间差异:第 2 周:25.7%,P<0.01;第 6 个月:18.9%,P=0.01,沙库巴曲缬沙坦组更优)。第 8 周和第 6 个月时,NYHA 心功能分级和堪萨斯城心肌病问卷(KCCQ)临床综合评分的变化无显著差异。沙库巴曲缬沙坦耐受性良好,因不良事件导致的停药率较低,尽管沙库巴曲缬沙坦组低血压患者比例较高。

结论

在日本 HFrEF 患者中,与依那普利相比,沙库巴曲缬沙坦并未降低 CV 死亡或 HF 住院风险,且沙库巴曲缬沙坦安全且耐受良好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验