Suppr超能文献

预防肝硬化伴有自发性门体分流患者的静脉曲张再出血:经颈静脉肝内门体分流术与内镜治疗的比较。

Prevention of variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients with spontaneous portosystemic shunts: transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt versus endoscopic treatment.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Medical University Drum Tower Clinical Medical School.

Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 May 1;33(5):752-761. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002079.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous portosystemic shunts(SPSSs) in cirrhotic patients indicate higher incidence of gastric varices, which increases the risk for bleeding and death. However, few studies compared endoscopic therapy with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in preventing variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients with SPSSs. This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the two methods in this group of patients.

METHODS

We reviewed consecutive cirrhotic patients with SPSSs who underwent either TIPS or endoscopic treatment to prevent variceal rebleeding between January 2015 and December 2018 in our institution. Outcomes including rebleeding, overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE), complications and survival were compared. Meanwhile, subgroup analyses were conducted to screen relevant factors affecting the results.

RESULTS

A total of 97 patients were included in the study. The TIPS arm contained 50 patients and the endoscopy arm contained 47 patients. Rebleeding rate in TIPS group was statistically lower than endoscopic group [16.0 vs 38.3%, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.37, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.16-0.84, P = 0.01], while OHE was more frequent (16.0 vs 2.1%, HR = 7.59, 95% CI: 0.94-61.2, P = 0.025), the survival rate (92 vs 89.4%, HR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.22-3.60, P = 0.87) and frequency of complications were comparable between two groups. In the subgroups of GOV2/IGV1 and splenorenal shunt/gastrorenal shunt, compared with endoscopic treatments, TIPS reduced the rate of rebleeding without significantly increasing overt hepatic encephalopathy; however, it did not improve survival rate.

CONCLUSIONS

For cirrhotic patients with SPSSs, TIPS brought a lower rebleeding rate but a higher incidence of OHE. However, in the subgroups of GOV2/IGV1 and splenorenal shunt/gastrorenal shunt, TIPS was considered more reasonable due to the lower rebleeding rate and comparable OHE incidence.

摘要

背景

肝硬化患者中自发性门体分流(SPSS)的发生率较高,提示胃静脉曲张的发生率较高,这增加了出血和死亡的风险。然而,很少有研究比较内镜治疗与经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)在预防 SPSS 肝硬化患者静脉曲张再出血方面的效果。本研究旨在评估这两种方法在这组患者中的效果。

方法

我们回顾了 2015 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间在我院接受 TIPS 或内镜治疗以预防 SPSS 肝硬化患者静脉曲张再出血的连续患者。比较再出血、显性肝性脑病(OHE)、并发症和生存率等结果。同时,进行亚组分析以筛选影响结果的相关因素。

结果

共有 97 例患者纳入研究。TIPS 组 50 例,内镜组 47 例。TIPS 组的再出血率明显低于内镜组[16.0%比 38.3%,风险比(HR)=0.37,95%置信区间(CI):0.16-0.84,P=0.01],而 OHE 更常见(16.0%比 2.1%,HR=7.59,95%CI:0.94-61.2,P=0.025),两组生存率(92%比 89.4%,HR=0.88,95%CI:0.22-3.60,P=0.87)和并发症发生率相当。在 GOV2/IGV1 和脾肾分流/胃肾分流亚组中,与内镜治疗相比,TIPS 降低了再出血率,而不会显著增加显性肝性脑病;然而,它并没有改善生存率。

结论

对于 SPSS 的肝硬化患者,TIPS 可降低再出血率,但 OHE 发生率较高。然而,在 GOV2/IGV1 和脾肾分流/胃肾分流亚组中,由于再出血率较低且 OHE 发生率相当,TIPS 被认为更为合理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验