Suppr超能文献

覆膜 TIPS 与内镜套扎联合普萘洛尔预防门静脉血栓形成的肝硬化患者静脉曲张再出血:一项随机对照试验。

Covered TIPS versus endoscopic band ligation plus propranolol for the prevention of variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis: a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Liver Diseases and Digestive Interventional Radiology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.

Department of Digestive Endoscopy, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

Gut. 2018 Dec;67(12):2156-2168. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314634. Epub 2017 Sep 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Limited data are available on the prevention of variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT). This study aimed to compare transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with covered stents versus endoscopic band ligation (EBL) plus propranolol for the prevention of variceal rebleeding among patients with cirrhosis and PVT.

DESIGN

Consecutive cirrhotic patients (94% Child-Pugh class A or B) with PVT who had variceal bleeding in the past 6 weeks were randomly assigned to TIPS group (n=24) or EBL plus propranolol group (EBL+drug, n=25), respectively. Primary endpoint was variceal rebleeding. Secondary endpoints included survival, overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE), portal vein recanalisation and rethrombosis, other complications of portal hypertension and adverse events.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 30 months in both groups, variceal rebleeding was significantly less frequent in the TIPS group (15% vs 45% at 1 year and 25% vs 50% at 2 years, respectively; HR=0.28, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.76, p=0.008), with a significantly higher portal vein recanalisation rate (95% vs 70%; p=0.03) and a relatively lower rethrombosis rate (5% vs 33%; p=0.06) compared with the EBL+drug group. There were no statistically significant differences in survival (67% vs 84%; p=0.152), OHE (25% vs 16%; p=0.440), other complications of portal hypertension and adverse events between groups.

CONCLUSION

Covered TIPS placement in patients with PVT and moderately decompensated cirrhosis was more effective than EBL combined with propranolol for the prevention of rebleeding, with a higher probability of PVT resolution without increasing the risk of OHE and adverse effects, but this benefit did not translate into improved survival.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01326949.

摘要

目的

关于预防伴有门静脉血栓形成(PVT)的肝硬化患者再发出血,目前仅有有限的数据。本研究旨在比较经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)与覆膜支架和内镜套扎(EBL)联合普萘洛尔预防过去 6 周内有静脉曲张出血的肝硬化合并 PVT 患者的静脉曲张再出血。

设计

连续的肝硬化患者(94%为 Child-Pugh 分级 A 或 B)伴有过去 6 周内 PVT 相关的静脉曲张出血,随机分为 TIPS 组(n=24)或 EBL 联合普萘洛尔组(EBL+药物,n=25)。主要终点为静脉曲张再出血。次要终点包括生存、显性肝性脑病(OHE)、门静脉再通和再血栓形成、其他门脉高压并发症和不良事件。

结果

在两组的中位随访 30 个月期间,TIPS 组静脉曲张再出血的发生率明显较低(1 年时分别为 15%和 45%,2 年时分别为 25%和 50%;HR=0.28,95%CI 0.10 至 0.76,p=0.008),门静脉再通率较高(95% vs 70%;p=0.03),再血栓形成率较低(5% vs 33%;p=0.06),与 EBL+药物组相比。两组之间的生存率(67% vs 84%;p=0.152)、OHE(25% vs 16%;p=0.440)、其他门脉高压并发症和不良事件均无统计学差异。

结论

对于伴有 PVT 和中度失代偿性肝硬化的患者,与 EBL 联合普萘洛尔相比,覆膜 TIPS 置入预防再出血更有效,PVT 缓解的可能性更高,而不增加 OHE 和不良事件的风险,但这种益处并未转化为生存改善。

试验注册号

ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT01326949。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验