Boldt Kevin, Joumaa Venus, Turnbull Jeannine, Fedak Paul W M, Herzog Walter
Human Performance Laboratory, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CANADA.
Department of Cardiac Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Calgary, Alberta, CANADA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2021 Aug 1;53(8):1583-1594. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002625.
Aerobic and resistance exercise training results in distinct structural changes of the heart. The mechanics of how cardiac cells adapt to resistance training and the benefits to cells when combining aerobic and resistance exercise remains largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare mechanical adaptations of skinned cardiac fiber bundles after chronic resistance, aerobic and combined exercise training in rats. We hypothesized that differences in mechanical function on the fiber bundle level coincide with differences previously reported in the structure of the heart.
Twelve-week-old rats were assigned to (i) an aerobic running group (n = 6), (ii) a ladder climbing resistance group (n = 6), (iii) a combination group subjected to aerobic and resistance training (n = 6), or (iv) a sedentary (control) group (n = 5). Echocardiography was used to measure cardiac structural remodeling. Skinned cardiac fiber bundles were used to determine active and passive force properties, maximal shortening velocity, and calcium sensitivity.
Aerobically trained animals had 43%-49% greater ventricular volume and myocardial thickness, and a 4%-17% greater shortening velocity and calcium sensitivity compared with control group rats. Resistance-trained rats had 37%-71% thicker ventricular walls, a 56% greater isometric force production, a 9% greater shortening velocity, and a 4% greater calcium sensitivity compared with control group rats. The combination exercise-trained rats had 25%-43% greater ventricular volume and myocardial wall thickness, a 55% greater active force production, a 7% greater shortening velocity, and a 60% greater cross-bridge cooperativity compared with control group rats.
The heart adapts differently to each exercise modality, and a combination of aerobic and resistance training may have the greatest benefit for cardiac health and performance.
有氧训练和抗阻训练会导致心脏结构发生明显变化。心脏细胞如何适应抗阻训练以及将有氧训练与抗阻训练相结合对细胞的益处,在很大程度上仍不为人知。本研究的目的是比较大鼠在进行慢性抗阻训练、有氧训练及联合训练后,去表皮心脏纤维束的力学适应性。我们假设纤维束水平的力学功能差异与先前报道的心脏结构差异相符。
将12周龄的大鼠分为:(i)有氧跑步组(n = 6);(ii)爬梯抗阻组(n = 6);(iii)有氧和抗阻联合训练组(n = 6);或(iv)久坐(对照)组(n = 5)。采用超声心动图测量心脏结构重塑。使用去表皮心脏纤维束测定主动和被动力特性、最大缩短速度及钙敏感性。
与对照组大鼠相比,有氧训练的动物心室容积和心肌厚度增加43%-49%,缩短速度和钙敏感性提高4%-17%。与对照组大鼠相比,抗阻训练的大鼠心室壁增厚37%-71%,等长力产生增加56%,缩短速度提高9%,钙敏感性提高4%。与对照组大鼠相比,联合训练的大鼠心室容积和心肌壁厚度增加25%-43%,主动力产生增加约55%,缩短速度提高7%,横桥协同性提高60%。
心脏对每种运动方式的适应不同,有氧训练与抗阻训练相结合可能对心脏健康和功能有最大益处。