Suppr超能文献

验证用于胎儿镜脊柱裂手术的高保真培训模型。

Validation of a high-fidelity training model for fetoscopic spina bifida surgery.

机构信息

MyFetUZ Fetal Research Center, Department of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Woman and Child, Biomedical Sciences, Catholic University KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Center for Surgical Technologies, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 17;11(1):6109. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85607-6.

Abstract

Open fetal surgery for spina bifida (SB) is safe and effective yet invasive. The growing interest in fetoscopic SB repair (fSB-repair) prompts the need for appropriate training. We aimed to develop and validate a high-fidelity training model for fSB-repair. fSB-repair was simulated in the abdominal cavity and on the stomach of adult rabbits. Laparoscopic fetal surgeons served either as novices (n = 2) or experts (n = 3) based on their experience. Technical performance was evaluated using competency Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) analysis and the group splitting method. Main outcome measure for CUSUM competency was a composite binary outcome for surgical success, i.e. watertight repair, operation time ≤ 180 min and Objective-Structured-Assessment-of-Technical-Skills (OSATS) score ≥ 18/25. Construct validity was first confirmed since competency levels of novices and experts during their six first cases using both methods were significantly different. Criterion validity was also established as 33 consecutive procedures were needed for novices to reach competency using learning curve CUSUM, which is a number comparable to that of clinical fSB-repair. Finally, we surveyed expert fetal surgeons worldwide to assess face and content validity. Respondents (26/49; 53%) confirmed it with ≥ 71% of scores for overall realism ≥ 4/7 and usefulness ≥ 3/5. We propose to use our high-fidelity model to determine and shorten the learning curve of laparoscopic fetal surgeons and retain operative skills.

摘要

胎儿开放性脊柱裂手术(SB)安全有效,但具有侵袭性。由于对胎儿内镜 SB 修复(fSB-修复)的兴趣日益浓厚,因此需要进行适当的培训。我们旨在开发和验证一种用于 fSB-修复的高保真培训模型。在成人兔的腹腔和胃上模拟 fSB-修复。根据经验,腹腔镜胎儿外科医生可以作为新手(n=2)或专家(n=3)。使用能力累积总和(CUSUM)分析和分组方法评估技术性能。CUSUM 能力的主要结果测量是手术成功的综合二进制结果,即密封修复、手术时间≤180 分钟和客观结构评估技术技能(OSATS)评分≥18/25。首先确认了构建有效性,因为两种方法在新手的前六例中,新手和专家的能力水平均存在显著差异。还建立了标准有效性,因为新手需要 33 个连续程序才能使用学习曲线 CUSUM 达到能力,这与临床 fSB-修复的数量相当。最后,我们调查了全球的专家胎儿外科医生,以评估其表面有效性和内容有效性。受访者(26/49;53%)以≥71%的总体真实性评分≥4/7和≥3/5的有用性评分对此表示肯定。我们建议使用我们的高保真模型来确定和缩短腹腔镜胎儿外科医生的学习曲线,并保留手术技能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f66d/7969952/207c87308036/41598_2021_85607_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of a high-fidelity training model for fetoscopic spina bifida surgery.
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 17;11(1):6109. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85607-6.
2
High-fidelity, low-cost synthetic training model for fetoscopic spina bifida repair.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024 Mar;6(3):101278. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101278. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
3
Operator competence in fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome: validation of a procedure-specific evaluation tool.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;47(3):350-5. doi: 10.1002/uog.15734. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
4
Learning curves of open and endoscopic fetal spina bifida closure: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jun;55(6):730-739. doi: 10.1002/uog.20389.
5
3D vs. 2D simulated fetoscopy for spina bifida repair: a quantitative motion analysis.
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 28;13(1):20951. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47531-9.
6
Does fetoscopic or open repair for spina bifida affect fetal and postnatal growth?
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;53(3):314-323. doi: 10.1002/uog.20220.
9
Fetoscopic spina bifida repair.
Minerva Ginecol. 2019 Apr;71(2):163-170. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4784.18.04355-1. Epub 2018 Nov 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Fetoscopic Robotic Open Spina Bifida Treatment (FROST): A Preclinical Feasibility and Learning Curve Study.
BJOG. 2025 Aug;132(9):1259-1268. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.18161. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
2
3D vs. 2D simulated fetoscopy for spina bifida repair: a quantitative motion analysis.
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 28;13(1):20951. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47531-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of two fetoscopic open neural tube defect repair techniques: single- vs three-layer closure.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Oct;56(4):532-540. doi: 10.1002/uog.21915.
2
Learning curves of open and endoscopic fetal spina bifida closure: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jun;55(6):730-739. doi: 10.1002/uog.20389.
3
Validation of the Fetal Lamb Model of Spina Bifida.
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 27;9(1):9327. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45819-3.
4
Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer.
Front Public Health. 2018 Jun 11;6:149. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149. eCollection 2018.
5
Fetoscopic two-layer closure of open neural tube defects.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Oct;52(4):452-457. doi: 10.1002/uog.19104. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
9
Percutaneous fetoscopic closure of large open spina bifida using a bilaminar skin substitute.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Oct;52(4):458-466. doi: 10.1002/uog.19001.
10
The Management of Myelomeningocele Study: full cohort 30-month pediatric outcomes.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2):256.e1-256.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.001. Epub 2017 Dec 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验