Institute of Evolutionary Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Commun Biol. 2021 Mar 17;4(1):347. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-01850-7.
The presence of multiple Australopithecus species at Sterkfontein Member 4, South Africa (2.07-2.61 Ma), is highly contentious, and quantitative assessments of craniodental and postcranial variability remain inconclusive. Using geometric morphometrics, we compared the sacrum of the small-bodied, presumed female subadult Australopithecus africanus skeleton Sts 14 to the large, alleged male adult StW 431 against a geographically diverse sample of modern humans, and two species of Pan, Gorilla, and Pongo. The probabilities of sampling morphologies as distinct as Sts 14 and StW 431 from a single species ranged from 1.3 to 2.5% for the human sample, and from 0.0 to 4.5% for the great apes, depending on the species and the analysis. Sexual dimorphism and developmental or geologic age could not adequately explain the differences between StW 431 and Sts 14, suggesting that they are unlikely to be conspecific. This supports earlier claims of taxonomic heterogeneity at Sterkfontein Member 4.
南非斯特克方丹 4 层(207-261 万年前)存在多个南方古猿物种,这一观点极具争议性,对颅面和后肢形态的定量评估仍然没有定论。我们使用几何形态测量学的方法,比较了小体型、被认为是女性未成年个体的南方古猿非洲种骨骼 Sts 14 的骶骨,以及体型较大、被认定为成年雄性的 StW 431 与来自不同地区的现代人类、两种大猩猩、黑猩猩和猩猩的骶骨。从人类样本中抽取与 Sts 14 和 StW 431 形态如此不同的样本的概率范围在 1.3%到 2.5%之间,而从大型类人猿样本中抽取的概率则在 0.0%到 4.5%之间,具体取决于分析的物种。性二型性以及发育或地质年龄都不能充分解释 StW 431 和 Sts 14 之间的差异,这表明它们不太可能是同一种物种。这支持了斯特克方丹 4 层存在分类学异质性的早期观点。