Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Institute for Neuroscience, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Front Neural Circuits. 2021 Feb 25;15:639733. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2021.639733. eCollection 2021.
The prelimbic (PL) region of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) has been implicated in both driving and suppressing motivated behaviors, including cocaine-seeking in rats. These seemingly opposing functions may be mediated by different efferent targets of PL projections, such as the nucleus accumbens (NAc) core and rostromedial tegmental nucleus (RMTg), which have contrasting roles in reward-seeking behaviors. We sought to characterize the anatomical connectivity differences between PL neurons projecting to NAc core and RMTg. We used conventional retrograde tracers to reveal distinct subpopulations of PL neurons projecting to NAc core vs. RMTg in rats, with very little overlap. To examine potential differences in input specificity for these two PL subpopulations, we then used Cre-dependent rabies virus (EnvA-RV-EGFP) as a monosynaptic retrograde tracer and targeted specific PL neurons injections of retrograde CAV2-Cre in either NAc core or RMTg. We observed a similar catalog of cortical, thalamic, and limbic afferents for both NAc- and RMTg-projecting populations, with the primary source of afferent information arising from neighboring prefrontal neurons in ipsilateral PL and infralimbic cortex (IL). However, when the two subpopulations were directly compared, we found that RMTg-projecting PL neurons received a greater proportion of input from ipsilateral PL and IL, whereas NAc-projecting PL neurons received a greater proportion of input from most other cortical areas, mediodorsal thalamic nucleus, and several other subcortical areas. NAc-projecting PL neurons also received a greater proportion of contralateral cortical input. Our findings reveal that PL subpopulations differ not only in their efferent target but also in the input specificity from afferent structures. These differences in connectivity are likely to be critical to functional differences of PL subpopulations.
前额皮层(PL)的前扣带回(mPFC)区域被认为与驱动和抑制动机行为有关,包括大鼠的可卡因寻求。这些看似相反的功能可能是由 PL 投射的不同传出靶点介导的,例如伏隔核(NAc)核心和 rostromedial 脑桥核(RMTg),它们在奖励寻求行为中起着相反的作用。我们试图描述投射到 NAc 核心和 RMTg 的 PL 神经元之间的解剖连接差异。我们使用传统的逆行示踪剂来揭示投射到 NAc 核心与 RMTg 的 PL 神经元的不同亚群,两者之间几乎没有重叠。为了检查这两个 PL 亚群的潜在输入特异性差异,我们随后使用 Cre 依赖性狂犬病毒(EnvA-RV-EGFP)作为单突触逆行示踪剂,并针对特定的 PL 神经元进行注射逆行 CAV2-Cre 在 NAc 核心或 RMTg 中。我们观察到两个 PL 亚群的皮质、丘脑和边缘传入具有相似的目录,其主要传入信息源来自同侧 PL 和下边缘皮质(IL)中的邻近前额叶神经元。然而,当将这两个亚群直接进行比较时,我们发现 RMTg 投射的 PL 神经元接收来自同侧 PL 和 IL 的输入比例更高,而 NAc 投射的 PL 神经元接收来自大多数其他皮质区域、中背侧丘脑核和其他几个皮质下区域的输入比例更高。NAc 投射的 PL 神经元也接收来自对侧皮质的更大比例的输入。我们的研究结果表明,PL 亚群不仅在它们的传出靶点上不同,而且在传入结构的输入特异性上也不同。这些连接差异可能对 PL 亚群的功能差异至关重要。