Domhardt Matthias, Schröder Annalena, Geirhos Agnes, Steubl Lena, Baumeister Harald
Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Germany.
Internet Interv. 2021 Feb 25;24:100373. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100373. eCollection 2021 Apr.
Digital health interventions might extend service provisions for youth with chronic medical conditions (CC) and comorbid mental health symptoms. We aimed to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy of Internet- and mobile-based interventions (IMIs) for different psychological and disease-related outcomes in children and adolescents with CC.
Studies were identified by systematic searches in CENTRAL, Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed and PsycINFO, complemented by searches in reference lists of eligible studies and other reviews. We included studies, when they were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of an IMI to control conditions in improving psychological and disease-related outcomes in youth (mean age ≤ 18 years) with CC. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers. Meta-analyses were performed within a random-effects model, and Hedges' (with 95% confidence intervals) was calculated as effect size measure. Primary outcomes were comorbid mental health symptoms (i.e., depression, anxiety and stress), as well as quality of life and self-efficacy.
A total of 19 randomized controlled trials (2410 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. IMIs were associated with improvements in self-efficacy ( = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.61; = 0) and combined disease-related outcomes ( = -0.13; 95% CI, -0.25 to -0.01 = 21). Meta-analyses on other outcomes were non-significant, and some pre-planned analyses were not feasible because of a shortage of studies.
The available evidence on IMIs for improving mental and health-related outcomes in youth with CC is limited. Our findings point to a rather small benefit and limited efficacy. Future research is needed, to comprehensively assess the potential of IMIs to extend collaborative care, and to identify factors contributing to improved user-centered interventions with better treatment outcomes.
数字健康干预可能会扩展针对患有慢性疾病(CC)及合并心理健康症状的青少年的服务提供。我们旨在全面评估基于互联网和移动设备的干预措施(IMIs)对患有CC的儿童和青少年不同心理及疾病相关结局的疗效。
通过在CENTRAL、Embase、MEDLINE/PubMed和PsycINFO中进行系统检索来识别研究,并辅以在符合条件的研究的参考文献列表及其他综述中的检索。当研究为随机对照试验(RCTs),比较IMI与对照条件在改善患有CC的青少年(平均年龄≤18岁)心理及疾病相关结局方面的疗效时,我们纳入这些研究。研究选择、数据提取和偏倚风险评估由两位评审员独立进行。在随机效应模型内进行荟萃分析,并计算Hedges' (95%置信区间)作为效应量指标。主要结局为合并的心理健康症状(即抑郁、焦虑和压力),以及生活质量和自我效能感。
本荟萃分析共纳入19项随机对照试验(2410名患者)。IMIs与自我效能感的改善相关( = 0.38;95% CI,0.15至0.61; = 0)以及合并的疾病相关结局的改善相关( = -0.13;95% CI,-0.25至-0.01 = 21)。对其他结局的荟萃分析无显著意义,且由于研究不足,一些预先计划的分析不可行。
关于IMIs改善患有CC的青少年心理和健康相关结局的现有证据有限。我们的研究结果表明益处相当小且疗效有限。需要未来的研究来全面评估IMIs扩展协作护理的潜力,并确定有助于改善以用户为中心的干预措施并取得更好治疗效果的因素。