Roembke Tanja C, Wiggs Kelsey K, McMurray Bob
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Nov;175:17-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.05.016. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
Considerable debate in language acquisition concerns whether word learning is driven by domain-general (symbolically flexible) or domain-specific learning mechanisms. Prior work has shown that very young children can map objects to either words or nonlinguistic sounds, but by 20 months of age this ability narrows to only words. This suggests that although symbolically flexible mechanisms are operative early, they become more specified over development. However, such research has been conducted only with young children in ostensive teaching contexts. Thus, we investigated symbolic flexibility at later ages in more referentially ambiguous learning situations. In Experiment 1, 47 6- to 8-year-olds acquired eight symbol-object mappings in a cross-situational word learning paradigm where multiple mappings are learned based only on co-occurrence. In the word condition participants learned with novel pseudowords, whereas in the sound condition participants learned with nonlinguistic sounds (e.g., beeps). Children acquired the mappings, but performance did not differ across conditions, suggesting broad symbolic flexibility. In Experiment 2, 41 adults learned 16 mappings in a comparable design. They learned with ease in both conditions but showed a significant advantage for words. Thus, symbolic flexibility decreases with age, potentially due to repeated experiences with linguistic materials. Moreover, trial-by-trial analyses of the microstructure of both children's and adults' performance did not reveal any substantial differences due to condition, consistent with the hypothesis that learning mechanisms are generally employed similarly with both words and nonlinguistic sounds.
在语言习得领域,关于词汇学习是由领域通用(符号灵活)还是领域特定的学习机制驱动,存在着相当多的争论。先前的研究表明,非常年幼的儿童能够将物体映射到单词或非语言声音上,但到20个月大时,这种能力就缩小到仅能映射到单词上。这表明,尽管符号灵活机制在早期起作用,但在发展过程中它们会变得更加特定。然而,此类研究仅在明示教学情境下对幼儿进行。因此,我们在更具指代歧义的学习情境中,研究了较大年龄阶段的符号灵活性。在实验1中,47名6至8岁儿童在一种跨情境单词学习范式中学习了八个符号 - 物体映射,在这种范式中,多个映射仅基于共现来学习。在单词条件下,参与者学习新的假词,而在声音条件下,参与者学习非语言声音(如哔哔声)。儿童学会了这些映射,但不同条件下的表现没有差异,这表明具有广泛的符号灵活性。在实验2中,41名成年人在类似的设计中学习了16个映射。他们在两种条件下都轻松学会了,但在单词学习方面表现出显著优势。因此,符号灵活性随着年龄增长而降低,这可能是由于对语言材料的反复体验所致。此外,对儿童和成年人表现微观结构的逐次试验分析并未揭示因条件不同而产生的任何实质性差异,这与学习机制在单词和非语言声音学习中通常以类似方式使用的假设一致。