Centre for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Klinikstraße 36, 35385, Giessen, Hessen, Germany.
Cognitive Neuroscience of Perception and Action, Faculty of Psychology, Philipps-University Marburg, Gutenbergstr. 18, 35032, Marburg, Germany.
Brain Topogr. 2021 May;34(3):283-296. doi: 10.1007/s10548-021-00827-3. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
Since our environment typically contains more information than can be processed at any one time due to the limited capacity of our visual system, we are bound to differentiate between relevant and irrelevant information. This process, termed attentional selection, is usually categorized into bottom-up and top-down processes. However, recent research suggests reward might also be an important factor in guiding attention. Monetary reward can bias attentional selection in favor of task-relevant targets and reduce the efficiency of visual search when a reward-associated, but task-irrelevant distractor is present. This study is the first to investigate reward-related target and distractor processing in an additional singleton task using neurophysiological measures and source space analysis. Based on previous studies, we hypothesized that source space analysis would find enhanced neural activity in regions of the value-based attention network, such as the visual cortex and the anterior cingulate. Additionally, we went further and explored the time courses of the underlying attentional mechanisms. Our neurophysiological results showed that rewarding distractors led to a stronger attentional capture. In line with this, we found that reward-associated distractors (compared with reward-associated targets) enhanced activation in frontal regions, indicating the involvement of top-down control processes. As hypothesized, source space analysis demonstrated that reward-related targets and reward-related distractors elicited activation in regions of the value-based attention network. However, these activations showed time-dependent differences, indicating that the neural mechanisms underlying reward biasing might be different for task-relevant and task-irrelevant stimuli.
由于我们的视觉系统容量有限,因此我们的环境中通常包含的信息量超过了我们一次可以处理的信息量,我们必然要区分相关信息和不相关信息。这个过程通常被分为自下而上和自上而下的过程。然而,最近的研究表明,奖励也可能是引导注意力的一个重要因素。金钱奖励可以使注意力偏向于与任务相关的目标,并在存在与任务不相关的分心物但与奖励相关时降低视觉搜索的效率。这项研究首次使用神经生理学测量和源空间分析来研究额外的单一任务中与奖励相关的目标和分心物处理。基于先前的研究,我们假设源空间分析将在基于价值的注意力网络区域(如视觉皮层和前扣带皮层)中发现增强的神经活动。此外,我们更进一步探索了潜在注意力机制的时间进程。我们的神经生理学结果表明,奖励性分心物会导致更强的注意力捕获。与此一致的是,我们发现与奖励相关的分心物(与奖励相关的目标相比)增强了额叶区域的激活,表明存在自上而下的控制过程。正如假设的那样,源空间分析表明奖励相关的目标和奖励相关的分心物在基于价值的注意力网络区域引起激活。然而,这些激活表现出时间依赖性差异,表明奖励偏向的神经机制可能与任务相关和任务不相关的刺激不同。