• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“六分法”在载药微球动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌中的适用性较低。

Low applicability of the ''Six-and-twelve score" in hepatocellular carcinoma treated with Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization.

机构信息

Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario de Cabueñes.

Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias.

出版信息

Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2022 Jan;114(1):28-34. doi: 10.17235/reed.2021.7696/2020.

DOI:10.17235/reed.2021.7696/2020
PMID:33733800
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The effectiveness of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) depends on the selection of suitable patients. The ''Six-and-twelve score" distinguishes three groups of ideal patients with different overall survival, based on the sum of the number and size of tumors. This may impact on clinical practice and trial design. The aim of this study was to assess the reproducibility and prognostic value of the model in western patients treated with Drug-Eluting Beads (DEB)-TACE.

METHODS

Observational, retrospective, unicentric study with consecutive compensated patients treated with DEB-TACE from October 2008 to October 2017. Exclusion criteria were Child-Pugh ≥ 8 and DEB-TACE used as a bridge to liver transplantation.

RESULTS

225 HCC consecutive patients were included; BCLC-0/A n=131 (single nodules > 5, n=29) and BCLC-B n=94. The median overall survival (OS) was 27 months (95% CI 23.8-30.2). OS was different between BCLC-0/A vs BCLC-B: 30 vs 24 months (p= 0.03), Child-Pugh A5 vs A6-B7: 30 vs 27 months (p= 0.003). ''Six-and-twelve score" groups discriminated OS: group 1, n=123, 32 months (95% CI 27.5-63.5), group 2, n=101, 24 months (95% CI 19.6-28.4) and group 3, n=1, 27 months (p=0.024). When comparing the three scores, the ''Six-and-twelve score" showed the best discrimination power: C-index 0.603, Akaike's information criterion (AIC) 1.642, likelihood ratio test (LRT) 16.21.

CONCLUSION

The ''Six-and-twelve score" is a prognostic tool for patients with HCC treated with DEB-TACE. However, few patients were included in the third group (score >12) and no differences were observed with BCLC, therefore its applicability is limited.  .

摘要

目的

经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)在肝细胞癌(HCC)中的疗效取决于合适患者的选择。“六二评分”根据肿瘤数量和大小的总和,将具有不同总生存的三组理想患者区分开来。这可能会影响临床实践和试验设计。本研究的目的是评估该模型在接受载药微球(DEB)-TACE 治疗的西方患者中的可重复性和预后价值。

方法

回顾性、单中心、观察性研究,纳入 2008 年 10 月至 2017 年 10 月连续接受 DEB-TACE 治疗的代偿性患者。排除标准为 Child-Pugh≥8 级和 DEB-TACE 作为肝移植桥接治疗。

结果

共纳入 225 例 HCC 连续患者;BCLC-0/A 期 131 例(单发结节>5cm,29 例),BCLC-B 期 94 例。中位总生存期(OS)为 27 个月(95%CI 23.8-30.2)。OS 在 BCLC-0/A 期与 BCLC-B 期之间存在差异:30 个月 vs 24 个月(p=0.03),Child-Pugh A5 级与 A6-B7 级:30 个月 vs 27 个月(p=0.003)。“六二评分”组区分 OS:组 1,n=123,32 个月(95%CI 27.5-63.5),组 2,n=101,24 个月(95%CI 19.6-28.4),组 3,n=1,27 个月(p=0.024)。当比较三个评分时,“六二评分”显示出最佳的区分能力:C 指数 0.603,Akaike 信息准则(AIC)1.642,似然比检验(LRT)16.21。

结论

“六二评分”是一种用于 DEB-TACE 治疗 HCC 患者的预后工具。然而,第三个评分组(评分>12)的患者数量较少,与 BCLC 无差异,因此其适用性有限。

相似文献

1
Low applicability of the ''Six-and-twelve score" in hepatocellular carcinoma treated with Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization.“六分法”在载药微球动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌中的适用性较低。
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2022 Jan;114(1):28-34. doi: 10.17235/reed.2021.7696/2020.
2
Analysis of survival and prognostic factors in treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in Spanish patients with drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization.西班牙患者药物洗脱微球经动脉化疗栓塞治疗肝细胞癌的生存及预后因素分析
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Dec;30(12):1453-1460. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001229.
3
Treatment efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with arterioportal fistula.载药微球动脉化疗栓塞与常规动脉化疗栓塞治疗伴有门腔分流的肝细胞癌患者的疗效和安全性。
Cancer Biol Ther. 2022 Dec 31;23(1):89-95. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2021.2020059.
4
Comparison of lipiodol infusion and drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma in a real-life setting.在实际临床环境中肝细胞癌的碘油灌注与载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞术的比较
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul;54(7):905-912. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1632925. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
5
Survival, efficacy, and safety of small versus large doxorubicin drug-eluting beads TACE chemoembolization in patients with unresectable HCC.小剂量与大剂量多柔比星载药微球 TACE 化疗栓塞治疗不可切除 HCC 患者的生存、疗效和安全性。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Dec;203(6):W706-14. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.12308.
6
Predictive performance of the mHAP-II score in a real-life western cohort with hepatocellular carcinoma following trans-arterial chemoembolisation with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE).mHAP-II 评分在经载药微球栓塞化疗(DEB-TACE)治疗的肝细胞癌患者中的真实世界预测性能。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Jul;30(7):3782-3792. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06734-8. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
7
Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization followed by apatinib is effective and safe in treating hepatocellular carcinoma patients with BCLC stage C.载药微球经动脉化疗栓塞术联合阿帕替尼治疗BCLC C期肝细胞癌患者有效且安全。
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2022 Mar;46(3):101859. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2022.101859. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
8
Survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated by transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) using Drug Eluting Beads. Implications for clinical practice and trial design.经载药微球动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)治疗的肝细胞癌患者的生存情况。对临床实践和试验设计的影响。
J Hepatol. 2012 Jun;56(6):1330-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.01.008. Epub 2012 Feb 5.
9
Safety and effectiveness of chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads for advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma.载药微球化疗栓塞术治疗晚期肝细胞癌的安全性与有效性
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014 Apr;37(2):381-7. doi: 10.1007/s00270-013-0654-7. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
10
Overall survival in response to sorafenib with transarterial chemoembolization for BCLC stage B hepatocellular carcinoma: propensity score analysis
.索拉非尼联合经动脉化疗栓塞治疗BCLC B期肝细胞癌的总生存期:倾向评分分析
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Jun;55(6):498-508. doi: 10.5414/CP202787.

引用本文的文献

1
Explainable machine learning model for predicting the transarterial chemoembolization response and subtypes of hepatocellular carcinoma patients.用于预测肝细胞癌患者经动脉化疗栓塞反应和亚型的可解释机器学习模型。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Jul 7;25(1):503. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-04105-5.
2
FAIL-T (AFP, AST, tumor sIze, ALT, and Tumor number): a model to predict intermediate-stage HCC patients who are not good candidates for TACE.FAIL-T(甲胎蛋白、谷草转氨酶、肿瘤大小、谷丙转氨酶和肿瘤数量):一种用于预测不适合经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)的中期肝癌患者的模型。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 May 2;10:1077842. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1077842. eCollection 2023.
3
Tumor Burden in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Transarterial Chemoembolization: Head-to-Head Comparison of Current Scoring Systems.
接受经动脉化疗栓塞的肝细胞癌患者的肿瘤负荷:现有评分系统的直接比较
Front Oncol. 2022 Feb 23;12:850454. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.850454. eCollection 2022.