• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度喀拉拉邦阿拉普扎市开展社区参与活动,以控制登革热和其他病媒传播疾病。

Community engagement to control dengue and other vector-borne diseases in Alappuzha municipality, Kerala, India.

机构信息

ICMR-National Institute of Virology, Kerala Unit, Alappuzha, India.

Division of Socio-Behavioural & Health Systems Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Pathog Glob Health. 2021 Jun;115(4):258-266. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2021.1890886. Epub 2021 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1080/20477724.2021.1890886
PMID:33734036
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8168773/
Abstract

Vector-borne diseases (VBDs) are a serious threat in many Indian states, including Kerala. Community-based decentralized planning and engagement are effective strategies that can make positive behavioral changes to control VBDs. This community-based implementation research was conducted during November 2016 - October 2018 in Alappuzha municipality in Kerala, India. It was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, formative research was conducted to know the community's profile and perceptions and thus to plan and develop an appropriate intervention. Baseline data on some entomological indicators were also collected. These data were used to assess the impact of the intervention by comparing with the post-intervention data. In the second phase, an intervention through the community's engagement was implemented in selected wards. The activities included the formation of community committees and the vector control and source reduction activities with the community engagement and inter-sectoral coordination. The intervention resulted in a positive change among the community to engage in vector control activities. These efforts along with inter-sectoral coordination resulted in successfully implementing vector source reduction activities. In both wards, pre- and post-intervention entomological data (house index: 16.7 vs 6.0 and 64.2 vs. 8.6; container index: 24.8 vs. 12.1 and 37.7 vs. 18.1; and Breteau index: 21.3 vs. 7.3 and 47.7 vs. 8.6) revealed a considerable vector source reduction. The findings of this study suggest considering and including community engagement in public health policy as the main thrust to control VBDs.

摘要

在包括喀拉拉邦在内的许多印度邦,虫媒传染病(VBDs)是一个严重的威胁。基于社区的分散规划和参与是有效的策略,可以促使人们做出积极的行为改变来控制 VBDs。这项基于社区的实施研究于 2016 年 11 月至 2018 年 10 月在印度喀拉拉邦的阿拉普扎市进行。它分两个阶段进行。在第一阶段,进行了形成性研究,以了解社区的概况和看法,从而规划和制定适当的干预措施。还收集了一些昆虫学指标的基线数据。这些数据用于通过与干预后数据进行比较来评估干预的影响。在第二阶段,在选定的病房中通过社区参与实施了干预措施。这些活动包括社区委员会的组建以及通过社区参与和部门间协调进行病媒控制和源头减少活动。该干预措施促使社区积极参与病媒控制活动。这些努力以及部门间协调成功实施了病媒源头减少活动。在两个病房中,干预前后的昆虫学数据(房屋指数:16.7 对 6.0 和 64.2 对 8.6;容器指数:24.8 对 12.1 和 37.7 对 18.1;布雷托指数:21.3 对 7.3 和 47.7 对 8.6)显示出相当大的病媒源头减少。这项研究的结果表明,考虑并将社区参与纳入公共卫生政策作为控制 VBDs 的主要重点。

相似文献

1
Community engagement to control dengue and other vector-borne diseases in Alappuzha municipality, Kerala, India.印度喀拉拉邦阿拉普扎市开展社区参与活动,以控制登革热和其他病媒传播疾病。
Pathog Glob Health. 2021 Jun;115(4):258-266. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2021.1890886. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
2
Community-based control of Aedes aegypti by adoption of eco-health methods in Chennai City, India.印度钦奈市采用生态健康方法进行基于社区的埃及伊蚊控制。
Pathog Glob Health. 2012 Dec;106(8):488-96. doi: 10.1179/2047773212Y.0000000056.
3
Determining the efficacy of guppies and pyriproxyfen (Sumilarv® 2MR) combined with community engagement on dengue vectors in Cambodia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.确定孔雀鱼和吡丙醚(Sumilarv® 2MR)联合社区参与对柬埔寨登革热媒介的效果:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Aug 4;18(1):367. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2105-2.
4
Application of eco-friendly tools and eco-bio-social strategies to control dengue vectors in urban and peri-urban settings in Thailand.应用环保工具和生态-生物-社会策略在泰国城市和城郊地区控制登革热媒介。
Pathog Glob Health. 2012 Dec;106(8):446-54. doi: 10.1179/2047773212Y.0000000059.
5
Seasonal variations of dengue vector mosquitoes in rural settings of Thiruvarur district in Tamil Nadu, India.印度泰米尔纳德邦蒂鲁瓦鲁尔区农村地区登革热媒介蚊虫的季节性变化。
J Vector Borne Dis. 2020 Jan-Mar;57(1):63-70. doi: 10.4103/0972-9062.308803.
6
[Evaluation of an educational module on dengue and Aedes aegypti for schoolchildren in Honduras].[对洪都拉斯学童开展的登革热和埃及伊蚊教育模块评估]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2004 Aug;16(2):84-94. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892004000800003.
7
Evidence based community mobilization for dengue prevention in Nicaragua and Mexico (Camino Verde, the Green Way): cluster randomized controlled trial.尼加拉瓜和墨西哥基于证据的登革热预防社区动员(绿色之路):整群随机对照试验
BMJ. 2015 Jul 8;351:h3267. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h3267.
8
Assessing dengue transmission risk and a vector control intervention using entomological and immunological indices in Thailand: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial.利用昆虫学和免疫学指标评估泰国登革热传播风险及病媒控制干预措施:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Feb 20;19(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2490-1.
9
Control of Aedes aegypti Breeding: A Novel Intervention for Prevention and Control of Dengue in an Endemic Zone of Delhi, India.埃及伊蚊繁殖控制:印度德里一个流行区预防和控制登革热的新型干预措施。
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 5;11(12):e0166768. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166768. eCollection 2016.
10
An analysis of community perceptions of mosquito-borne disease control and prevention in Sint Eustatius, Caribbean Netherlands.对荷兰加勒比地区圣尤斯特歇斯岛社区对蚊媒疾病控制与预防的认知分析。
Glob Health Action. 2017;10(1):1350394. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1350394.

引用本文的文献

1
Community-based intervention in mosquito control strategy: A systematic review.基于社区的蚊虫控制策略干预:一项系统综述
Narra J. 2025 Apr;5(1):e1015. doi: 10.52225/narra.v5i1.1015. Epub 2025 Jan 1.
2
Prevalence and attributable health burdens of vector-borne parasitic infectious diseases of poverty, 1990-2021: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.1990 - 2021年贫困地区媒介传播寄生虫感染性疾病的患病率及可归因健康负担:全球疾病负担研究2021的结果
Infect Dis Poverty. 2024 Dec 11;13(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s40249-024-01260-x.
3
One Health prevention and preparedness to vector-borne diseases: how should we deal with a multisectoral, multilevel and multigroup governance?“同一健康”对媒介传播疾病的预防与准备:我们应如何应对多部门、多层次和多群体治理?
One Health Outlook. 2024 Nov 1;6(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s42522-024-00114-8.
4
Anti-Dengue Sanitation Practices: A Health Education Approach for Municipal Sanitary Workers in Puducherry, India.抗登革热卫生措施:印度本地治里市市政卫生工作者的健康教育方法
Cureus. 2024 Jul 23;16(7):e65227. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65227. eCollection 2024 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Mind your Language: Discursive Practices Produce Unequal Power and Control Over Infectious Disease: A Critical Discourse Analysis.注意你的语言:话语实践对传染病产生不平等的权力与控制:一项批判性话语分析
Int J Prev Med. 2020 Mar 16;11:37. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_431_17. eCollection 2020.
2
Strengthening of vector control in South-East Asia: Outcomes from a WHO regional workshop.东南亚病媒控制的强化:世卫组织区域研讨会的成果
J Vector Borne Dis. 2018 Oct-Dec;55(4):247-257. doi: 10.4103/0972-9062.256559.
3
Addressing vulnerability, building resilience: community-based adaptation to vector-borne diseases in the context of global change.应对脆弱性,增强复原力:在全球变化背景下基于社区的病媒传播疾病适应。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2017 Dec 11;6(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s40249-017-0375-2.
4
Community sensitization and decision-making for trial participation: A mixed-methods study from The Gambia.社区对试验参与的认知及决策:来自冈比亚的一项混合方法研究
Dev World Bioeth. 2018 Dec;18(4):406-419. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12160. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
5
Why Did Zika Not Explode in Cuba? The Role of Active Community Participation to Sustain Control of Vector-Borne Diseases.为什么寨卡病毒没有在古巴爆发?积极的社区参与在维持病媒传播疾病控制中的作用。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Aug;97(2):311-312. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0906. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
6
Presence of three dengue serotypes in Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso): research and public health implications.瓦加杜古(布基纳法索)三种登革热血清型的存在:研究及对公共卫生的影响
Infect Dis Poverty. 2016 Apr 5;5:23. doi: 10.1186/s40249-016-0120-2.
7
Global aspirations, local realities: the role of social science research in controlling neglected tropical diseases.全球抱负,本土现实:社会科学研究在控制被忽视热带病中的作用。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2014 Oct 1;3(1):35. doi: 10.1186/2049-9957-3-35. eCollection 2014.
8
Community participation in the prevention and control of dengue: the patio limpio strategy in Mexico.社区参与登革热防控:墨西哥的“清洁庭院”策略
Paediatr Int Child Health. 2012 May;32 Suppl 1(s1):10-3. doi: 10.1179/2046904712Z.00000000047.
9
Chikungunya virus outbreak in Kerala, India, 2007: a seroprevalence study.2007 年印度喀拉拉邦的基孔肯雅热病毒爆发:一项血清流行率研究。
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2011 Dec;106(8):912-6. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762011000800003.
10
The experience of community engagement for individuals: a rapid review of evidence.个体参与社区的体验:快速证据回顾。
Health Soc Care Community. 2011 May;19(3):250-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00976.x. Epub 2010 Dec 8.