Suppr超能文献

德国狂犬病暴露后预防 - 面临哪些挑战?

Rabies post-exposure prophylaxis in Germany - What are the challenges?

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Department of Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Epidemiol Infect. 2021 Mar 18;149:e119. doi: 10.1017/S0950268821000601.

Abstract

Rabies post-exposure prophylaxis (R-PEP) including wound treatment, vaccination and application of rabies immunoglobulin (RIG) is essential in preventing rabies mortality. Today, Germany is officially declared free from terrestrial rabies and rabies is only found in bats. However, physicians in A&E Departments are frequently consulted on the need for R-PEP. We retrospectively analysed patients who received R-PEP at the A&E Department of the University Hospital Bonn between 01.01.2013 and 30.06.2019. Demographic data, travel history, clinical and laboratory findings, previous rabies vaccinations and R-PEP vaccination regimen were recorded. During the study period, 90 patients received R-PEP at the University Hospital Bonn, in 10 cases without indication for R-PEP. Altogether, we found deviations from R-PEP guidelines in 51% (n = 41/80). Infiltration of RIG was missed in 12 patients and incorrectly administrated in 24 patients. Furthermore, vaccination scheme was incorrect in 11 patients. Correct wound washing and documentation of tetanus status was missing in 14% and 63% of patients, respectively. Despite rabies elimination in Germany patients frequently seek advice for R-PEP, the majority returning from foreign travel. Our data show that there is a high need for education on indication for R-PEP before and after travel and for implementation of precise R-PEP guidelines in daily clinical practice.

摘要

狂犬病暴露后预防(R-PEP)包括伤口处理、疫苗接种和狂犬病免疫球蛋白(RIG)的应用,对于预防狂犬病死亡率至关重要。如今,德国已正式宣布陆地狂犬病绝迹,狂犬病仅在蝙蝠中发现。然而,急诊科的医生经常会被咨询是否需要进行 R-PEP。我们回顾性分析了 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 6 月 30 日期间在波恩大学医院急诊科接受 R-PEP 的患者。记录了人口统计学数据、旅行史、临床和实验室发现、既往狂犬病疫苗接种和 R-PEP 疫苗接种方案。在研究期间,90 名患者在波恩大学医院接受了 R-PEP,其中 10 例没有 R-PEP 的指征。总的来说,我们发现 51%(n=41/80)的患者存在 R-PEP 指南的偏差。有 12 名患者未进行 RIG 浸润,24 名患者错误给药。此外,11 名患者的疫苗接种方案不正确。14%和 63%的患者分别未正确清洗伤口和记录破伤风状态。尽管德国已消除狂犬病,但患者仍频繁寻求 R-PEP 的咨询,其中大多数人是从国外旅行回来的。我们的数据表明,在旅行前后以及在日常临床实践中需要对 R-PEP 的指征进行教育,并需要严格执行精确的 R-PEP 指南。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca3f/8161409/e91b15d47f64/S0950268821000601_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验