• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊髓刺激治疗难治性心绞痛患者的术前评估。

Pre-Operative Assessment of Patients Undergoing Spinal Cord Stimulation for Refractory Angina Pectoris.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

Pain Med. 2021 Nov 26;22(11):2763-2767. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab105.

DOI:10.1093/pm/pnab105
PMID:33734390
Abstract

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is used to treat a variety of chronic pain conditions refractory to more conservative management including refractory angina pectoris. We identified 31 patients who underwent SCS implantation for the indication of refractory angina at a single institution from 2003 through 2018. Sixteen patients were male, and 15 were female. Average age was 53.9 years. Prior to SCS implantation, all patients had at least one coronary angiogram. Ten (32.3%) patients had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention, and four (12.9%) had undergone coronary artery bypass grafting. Thirty patients (96.7%) were currently using anti-angina medications. Twenty-six patients (83.9%) were on antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents at the time of SCS evaluation. Spinal cord stimulation implanters must perform a comprehensive evaluation incorporating appropriate multidisciplinary care particularly in patients with refractory angina given their cardiovascular comorbidities. It is important to have baseline data (e.g., pain scores, nitroglycerin consumption, frequency of angina episodes, and a questionnaire, such as the Seattle Angina Questionnaire) to compare with follow-up data to help define treatment success. We report a single institution's pre-operative experience for patients undergoing SCS for refractory angina to illustrate unique pre-operative SCS considerations in this chronic pain population.

摘要

脊髓刺激 (SCS) 用于治疗多种慢性疼痛病症,这些病症对更保守的治疗方法(包括难治性心绞痛)无效。我们在一家机构中确定了 31 名因难治性心绞痛而接受 SCS 植入的患者,这些患者的病例发生在 2003 年至 2018 年期间。16 名患者为男性,15 名患者为女性。平均年龄为 53.9 岁。在进行 SCS 植入之前,所有患者都至少进行过一次冠状动脉造影。10 名(32.3%)患者接受了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,4 名(12.9%)患者接受了冠状动脉旁路移植术。30 名患者(96.7%)正在使用抗心绞痛药物。在 SCS 评估时,26 名患者(83.9%)正在使用抗血小板或抗凝药物。脊髓刺激植入器必须进行全面评估,包括适当的多学科护理,特别是对于患有难治性心绞痛的患者,因为他们有心血管合并症。重要的是要有基线数据(例如,疼痛评分、硝化甘油消耗、心绞痛发作频率和西雅图心绞痛问卷等问卷)与随访数据进行比较,以帮助确定治疗成功。我们报告了一家机构中接受 SCS 治疗难治性心绞痛的患者的术前经验,以说明在这种慢性疼痛人群中,SCS 术前有独特的考虑因素。

相似文献

1
Pre-Operative Assessment of Patients Undergoing Spinal Cord Stimulation for Refractory Angina Pectoris.脊髓刺激治疗难治性心绞痛患者的术前评估。
Pain Med. 2021 Nov 26;22(11):2763-2767. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab105.
2
The Use of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire in Patients Who Underwent Spinal Cord Stimulation for Refractory Angina Pectoris.脊髓刺激治疗难治性心绞痛患者中西雅图心绞痛问卷的应用。
Pain Med. 2021 Apr 20;22(4):1005-1009. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa447.
3
Assessment of economic effectiveness in treatment of neuropathic pain and refractory angina pectoris using spinal cord stimulation.脊髓刺激治疗神经性疼痛和难治性心绞痛的经济学效果评估。
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2012 Sep-Oct;21(5):653-63.
4
Multimorbidity, the predominant predictor of quality-of-life, following successful spinal cord stimulation for angina pectoris.多种并存疾病是影响心绞痛脊髓刺激成功后生活质量的主要预测因素。
Neuromodulation. 2011 Jan;14(1):13-8; discussion 18-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2010.00321.x. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
5
Spinal cord stimulation for refractory angina pectoris: a retrospective analysis of efficacy and cost-benefit.脊髓刺激治疗顽固性心绞痛:疗效与成本效益的回顾性分析
Coron Artery Dis. 2004 Feb;15(1):31-7. doi: 10.1097/00019501-200402000-00005.
6
Efficacy of spinal cord stimulation as an adjunct therapy for chronic refractory angina pectoris.脊髓刺激作为慢性顽固性心绞痛辅助治疗的疗效
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Jan 15;227:535-542. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.10.105. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
7
Long-term effects of spinal cord stimulation on angina symptoms and quality of life in patients with refractory angina pectoris--results from the European Angina Registry Link Study (EARL).脊髓刺激对难治性心绞痛患者心绞痛症状和生活质量的长期影响——来自欧洲心绞痛登记研究链接研究(EARL)的结果。
Heart. 2010 Jul;96(14):1132-6. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2009.177188. Epub 2010 May 18.
8
Spinal cord stimulation for patients with refractory angina and previous coronary surgery.脊髓刺激治疗难治性心绞痛和既往有冠状动脉手术史的患者。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Nov;82(5):1704-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.05.096.
9
Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of refractory angina pectoris: a multicenter randomized single-blind study (the SCS-ITA trial).脊髓刺激治疗难治性心绞痛:多中心随机单盲研究(SCS-ITA 试验)。
Pain. 2011 Jan;152(1):45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.08.044. Epub 2010 Nov 16.
10
[Epidural spinal cord stimulation in chronic refractory angina pectoris].[硬膜外脊髓刺激治疗慢性顽固性心绞痛]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2004 Nov 4;124(21):2754-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Improvement of brain perfusion in patients with chronic brain ischemia at epidural spinal cord electrical stimulation.硬膜外脊髓电刺激对慢性脑缺血患者脑灌注的改善作用
Front Surg. 2022 Sep 23;9:1026079. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1026079. eCollection 2022.