评估预印本发表的临床研究与随后在高影响力期刊上发表的研究之间的一致性和分歧。
Assessment of Concordance and Discordance Among Clinical Studies Posted as Preprints and Subsequently Published in High-Impact Journals.
机构信息
Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
Section of General Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
出版信息
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e212110. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.2110.
Abstract
This cross-sectional study examines the concordance between clinical studies posted as preprints and subsequently published in high-impact journals, including key study characteristics, reported results, and study interpretations.
摘要
本横断面研究考察了作为预印本发布并随后在高影响力期刊上发表的临床研究之间的一致性，包括关键研究特征、报告结果和研究解释。
相似文献
1
Assessment of Concordance and Discordance Among Clinical Studies Posted as Preprints and Subsequently Published in High-Impact Journals.评估预印本发表的临床研究与随后在高影响力期刊上发表的研究之间的一致性和分歧。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e212110. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.2110.
2
What "Impact" Do NLME Publications Have Outside Our Community?NLME 出版物对我们社区之外有什么“影响”？
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2020 Apr;9(4):191-194. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12501. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
3
[High-ranking publications of Dermato-Oncology].[皮肤肿瘤学的高级别出版物]
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2013 Sep;11(9):895. doi: 10.1111/ddg.12186.
4
[Analysis on acupuncture literature in Science Citation Index (SCI) periodicals in 2007].[2007年科学引文索引（SCI）期刊针灸文献分析]
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2009 Jun;29(6):504-7.
5
Assessment of Preprint Policies of Top-Ranked Clinical Journals.顶级临床期刊预印本政策评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2011127. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11127.
6
7
Congenital Chagas disease: alert of research negligence.先天性恰加斯病：研究疏忽的警示
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2019 Feb 21;52:e20180069. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0069-2018.
8
Citation classics in obstetrics and gynecology: the 100 most frequently cited journal articles in the last 50 years.妇产科引文经典：过去 50 年中被引用次数最多的 100 篇期刊文章。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Oct;203(4):355.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.07.025.
9
[Characteristics of nursing publications in journals with impact factor].[具有影响因子的期刊中护理出版物的特征]
Enferm Clin. 2012 Sep-Oct;22(5):247-54. doi: 10.1016/j.enfcli.2012.06.006. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
10
Scientific publications in critical care medicine journals from Chinese authors: a 10-year survey of the literature.中国作者在重症医学期刊上发表的科学出版物：一项为期10年的文献调查。
J Trauma. 2010 Oct;69(4):E20-3. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c45257.
引用本文的文献
1
Practice of data sharing plans in clinical trial registrations and concordance between registered and published data sharing plans: a cross-sectional study.临床试验注册中数据共享计划的实施情况以及注册数据共享计划与发表数据共享计划之间的一致性：一项横断面研究。
BMC Med. 2025 Sep 1;23(1):510. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04328-z.
2
Using an expert survey and user feedback to construct PRECHECK: A checklist to evaluate preprints on COVID-19 and beyond.利用专家调查和用户反馈来构建 PRECHECK：一个评估 COVID-19 及其他预印本的清单。
F1000Res. 2024 Jun 3;12:588. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.129814.3. eCollection 2023.
3
Full publication of preprint articles in prevention research: an analysis of publication proportions and results consistency.预防研究中预印本文章的全文发表：对出版比例和结果一致性的分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 9;13(1):17034. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44291-4.
4
Completeness and consistency of primary outcome reporting in COVID-19 publications in the early pandemic phase: a descriptive study.新冠疫情早期阶段 COVID-19 研究出版物中主要结局报告的完整性和一致性：描述性研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Jul 29;23(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01991-9.
5
Predicting substantive biomedical citations without full text.预测无全文的实质性生物医学引文。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jul 25;120(30):e2213697120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2213697120. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
6
Comparison of COVID-19 Preprint and Peer-Reviewed Versions of Studies on Therapies for Critically Ill Patients.比较危重症患者治疗研究的 COVID-19 预印本和同行评审版本。
J Intensive Care Med. 2023 Nov;38(11):1060-1067. doi: 10.1177/08850666231182563. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
7
Consistency of covid-19 trial preprints with published reports and impact for decision making: retrospective review.新冠病毒19临床试验预印本与已发表报告的一致性及其对决策的影响：回顾性审查
BMJ Med. 2022 Oct 3;1(1):e000309. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000309. eCollection 2022.
8
Comparison of Clinical Study Results Reported in medRxiv Preprints vs Peer-reviewed Journal Articles.medRxiv 预印本与同行评议期刊文章中报告的临床研究结果比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Dec 1;5(12):e2245847. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.45847.
9
Evaluation of Publication of COVID-19-Related Articles Initially Presented as Preprints.对最初以预印本形式发表的与 COVID-19 相关文章的发表情况评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Dec 1;5(12):e2245745. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.45745.
10
Transparency and reporting characteristics of COVID-19 randomized controlled trials.COVID-19 随机对照试验的透明度和报告特征。
BMC Med. 2022 Sep 26;20(1):363. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02567-y.
本文引用的文献
1
Submissions and Downloads of Preprints in the First Year of medRxiv.预印本在 medRxiv 上线首年的提交和下载情况。
JAMA. 2020 Nov 10;324(18):1903-1905. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.17529.
2
Preprints Involving Medical Research-Do the Benefits Outweigh the Challenges?涉及医学研究的预印本——益处是否大于挑战？
JAMA. 2020 Nov 10;324(18):1840-1843. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.20674.
3
Assessment of Preprint Policies of Top-Ranked Clinical Journals.顶级临床期刊预印本政策评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2011127. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11127.
4
Medical Preprints-A Debate Worth Having.医学预印本——一场值得进行的辩论。
JAMA. 2018 Feb 6;319(5):443-444. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.17566.
5
Reporting of results in ClinicalTrials.gov and high-impact journals.在ClinicalTrials.gov和高影响力期刊上报告研究结果。
JAMA. 2014 Mar 12;311(10):1063-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.285634.
Zotero 插件