Page R A, Handley G W
Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, Lima 45804.
J Psychol. 1988 Mar;122(2):119-31. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1988.9712697.
In this study, we attempted to partially replicate and extend the findings of the Page (1985) study of hypnotic age regression and moral reasoning. The Kohlberg (1976) Moral Judgment Interview (MJI) was used to assess the initial stage of moral reasoning in 32 adults who were preselected on the basis of their hypnotic susceptibility. Subjects were hypnotized and age regressed to two of four possible ages (16, 13, 10, and 7), or were given task-motivation instructions before being age regressed. All were then administered the MJI, which involves the resolution of certain dilemmas. Both groups were able to lower their moral reasoning scores when given age regression instructions, but no significant differences were found between groups. Thus the results of this study are inconsistent with those of Page (1985), but are consistent with those of O'Brien et al. (1977). Reasons for the failure to reaffirm the earlier results of Page (1985) are discussed.
在本研究中,我们试图部分重复并扩展佩奇(1985年)关于催眠年龄退行与道德推理研究的结果。采用科尔伯格(1976年)道德判断访谈(MJI)来评估32名成年人的道德推理初始阶段,这些成年人是根据他们的催眠易感性预先挑选出来的。受试者被催眠并年龄退行到四个可能年龄(16岁、13岁、10岁和7岁)中的两个,或者在年龄退行之前接受任务动机指导。然后所有人都接受了MJI,其中涉及解决某些困境。当给予年龄退行指导时,两组的道德推理得分都能够降低,但两组之间未发现显著差异。因此,本研究结果与佩奇(1985年)的结果不一致,但与奥布赖恩等人(1977年)的结果一致。文中讨论了未能再次证实佩奇(1985年)早期结果的原因。