• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较澳大利亚的阿片类药物制造商为医生和护士举办的教育活动。

A comparison of educational events for physicians and nurses in Australia sponsored by opioid manufacturers.

机构信息

Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Pharmacy School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 18;16(3):e0248238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248238. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0248238
PMID:33735203
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7971255/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Educational activities for physicians sponsored by opioid manufacturers are implicated in the over- and mis-prescribing of opioids. However, the implications of promotion to nurses are poorly understood. Nurses play a key role in assessing pain, addressing the determinants of pain, and administering opioid medications. We sought to understand the nature and content of pain-related educational events sponsored by opioid manufacturers and to compare events targeting physicians and nurses.

METHODS

We conducted a cross sectional, descriptive analysis of pharmaceutical company reports detailing 116,845 sponsored educational events attended by health professionals from 2011 to 2015 in Australia. We included events that were sponsored by manufacturers of prescription opioid analgesics and were pain related. We compared event characteristics across three attendee groups: (a) physicians only; (b) at least one nurse in attendance; and (c) nurses only. We coded the unstructured data using iteratively generated keywords for variables related to location, format, and content focus.

RESULTS

We identified 3,411 pain-related events sponsored by 3 companies: bioCSL/CSL (n = 15), Janssen (n = 134); and Mundipharma (n = 3,262). Pain-related events were most often multidisciplinary, including at least one nurse (1,964/3,411; 58%); 38% (1,281/3,411) included physicians only, and 5% (166/3,411) nurses only. The majority of events were held in clinical settings (61%) and 43% took the form of a journal club. Chronic pain was the most common event topic (26%) followed by cancer pain and palliative care (18%), and then generic or unspecified references to pain (15%); nearly a third (32%) of event descriptions contained insufficient information to determine the content focus. Nurse-only events were less frequently held in clinical settings (32%; p < .001) and more frequently were product launches (17%; p < .001) and a significantly larger proportion focused on cancer or palliative care (33%; p < .001), generic pain topics (27%; p < .001), and geriatrics (25%; p < .001) than physician-only or multidisciplinary events.

DISCUSSION

Opioid promotion via sponsored educational events extends beyond physicians to multidisciplinary teams and specifically, nurses. Despite lack of evidence that opioids improve outcomes for long-term chronic non-cancer pain, hundreds of sponsored educational events focused on chronic pain. Regulators should consider the validity of distinguishing between pharmaceutical companies' "promotional" and "non-promotional" activities.

摘要

背景

由阿片类药物制造商赞助的针对医生的教育活动与阿片类药物的过度和错误处方有关。然而,针对护士的促销活动的影响却知之甚少。护士在评估疼痛、解决疼痛决定因素和管理阿片类药物方面发挥着关键作用。我们试图了解由阿片类药物制造商赞助的与疼痛相关的教育活动的性质和内容,并比较针对医生和护士的活动。

方法

我们对澳大利亚制药公司报告进行了横断面描述性分析,这些报告详细说明了 2011 年至 2015 年期间有 116845 名卫生专业人员参加的 116845 次由制药公司赞助的教育活动。我们纳入了由处方类阿片类镇痛药制造商赞助且与疼痛相关的活动。我们比较了三个参会者群体(a)仅医生;(b)至少有一名护士参加;和(c)仅护士的活动特征。我们使用迭代生成的关键字对与地点、格式和内容重点相关的变量进行了非结构化数据的编码。

结果

我们确定了 3411 次由 3 家公司赞助的与疼痛相关的活动:bioCSL/CSL(n = 15);杨森(n = 134);和 Mundipharma(n = 3262)。与疼痛相关的活动通常是多学科的,包括至少一名护士(1964/3411;58%);38%(1281/3411)的活动仅包括医生,5%(166/3411)的活动仅包括护士。大多数活动在临床环境中举行(61%),43%的活动采用期刊俱乐部的形式。慢性疼痛是最常见的活动主题(26%),其次是癌症疼痛和姑息治疗(18%),然后是通用或未具体提及疼痛(15%);近三分之一(32%)的活动描述包含的信息不足以确定内容重点。仅护士参加的活动在临床环境中举行的频率较低(32%;p <.001),更频繁地举办产品发布(17%;p <.001),且更有可能专注于癌症或姑息治疗(33%;p <.001)、通用疼痛主题(27%;p <.001)和老年医学(25%;p <.001),而不是医生或多学科活动。

讨论

通过赞助的教育活动进行阿片类药物促销不仅限于医生,还扩展到多学科团队,特别是护士。尽管没有证据表明阿片类药物能改善长期慢性非癌性疼痛的预后,但仍有数百次与慢性疼痛相关的赞助教育活动。监管机构应考虑区分制药公司“促销”和“非促销”活动的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d45/7971255/bb23d05ca3fe/pone.0248238.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d45/7971255/bb23d05ca3fe/pone.0248238.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d45/7971255/bb23d05ca3fe/pone.0248238.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A comparison of educational events for physicians and nurses in Australia sponsored by opioid manufacturers.比较澳大利亚的阿片类药物制造商为医生和护士举办的教育活动。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 18;16(3):e0248238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248238. eCollection 2021.
2
[Patterns of prescription of opioid analgesics in Hôtel-Dieu de France of Beyrouth].[贝鲁特法国主宫医院阿片类镇痛药的处方模式]
Encephale. 2016 Dec;42(6):511-516. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Pharmaceutical industry funding of events for healthcare professionals on non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants in Australia: an observational study.澳大利亚非维生素 K 口服抗凝剂的医药行业为医疗保健专业人员举办活动的情况:一项观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 20;9(8):e030253. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030253.
5
Influence of pharmaceutical promotion on prescribers in Jordan.约旦的医药推广对处方医生的影响。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2020 Apr;42(2):744-755. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01006-3. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
6
Interactions between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry: what does the literature say?医生与制药行业之间的互动:文献有何说法?
CMAJ. 1993 Nov 15;149(10):1401-7.
7
Prescriber Education Interventions to Optimize Opioid Prescribing in Acute Care: A Systematic Review.优化急性护理中阿片类药物处方的处方教育干预措施:系统评价。
Pain Physician. 2019 Nov;22(6):E551-E562.
8
Information from pharmaceutical companies and the quality, quantity, and cost of physicians' prescribing: a systematic review.来自制药公司的信息以及医生处方的质量、数量和成本:系统评价。
PLoS Med. 2010 Oct 19;7(10):e1000352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000352.
9
Beliefs and attitudes about prescribing opioids among healthcare providers seeking continuing medical education.寻求继续医学教育的医疗服务提供者对开具阿片类药物的信念和态度。
J Opioid Manag. 2011 Nov-Dec;7(6):417-24. doi: 10.5055/jom.2011.0082.
10
Physician survey examining the impact of an educational tool for responsible opioid prescribing.一项关于负责任阿片类药物处方教育工具影响的医生调查。
J Opioid Manag. 2012 Mar-Apr;8(2):81-7. doi: 10.5055/jom.2012.0100.

引用本文的文献

1
"I never thought of it as payment": Qualitative evaluation of workshops with advanced practice registered nurses on pharmaceutical industry payment reporting.“我从未将其视为报酬”:对高级执业注册护士关于制药行业报酬报告的研讨会的定性评估
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2025 Jan 1;37(1):51-60. doi: 10.1097/JXX.0000000000001077.
2
Quantifying Industry Spending on Promotional Events Using Open Payments Data.利用公开支付数据量化行业促销活动支出。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Jun 7;5(6):e241581. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.1581.
3
Pills and the damage done: the opioid epidemic as man-made crisis.

本文引用的文献

1
Interventions to Influence Opioid Prescribing Practices for Chronic Noncancer Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.干预措施对影响阿片类药物处方治疗慢性非癌痛的实践:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Jan;60(1):e15-e26. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.07.012. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
2
Understanding the Nature and Extent of Pharmaceutical Industry Payments to Nonphysician Clinicians.了解制药行业向非医师临床医生支付款项的性质和范围。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Oct 1;179(10):1430-1432. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.1371.
3
Changes in the type and amount of spending disclosed by Australian pharmaceutical companies: an observational study.
药丸与造成的损害:人为制造的阿片类药物危机。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 12;11:1241404. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1241404. eCollection 2023.
4
How the Suboxone Education Programme presented as a solution to risks in the Canadian opioid crisis: a critical discourse analysis.《Suboxone 教育计划如何被呈现为解决加拿大阿片类药物危机中的风险的一种方案:批判性话语分析》。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 12;12(7):e059561. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059561.
澳大利亚制药公司披露的支出类型和金额变化:一项观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 19;9(2):e024928. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024928.
4
Association of Pharmaceutical Industry Marketing of Opioid Products With Mortality From Opioid-Related Overdoses.制药行业阿片类产品营销与阿片类药物相关过量死亡率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e186007. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6007.
5
The Burden of Opioid-Related Mortality in the United States.美国阿片类药物相关死亡率负担。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Jun 1;1(2):e180217. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0217.
6
Increases in controlled-release oxycodone utilisation following the subsidy of oxycodone with naloxone formulations: An Australian population-based study.控释羟考酮的使用增加,奥氮平-纳洛酮制剂补贴后:一项基于澳大利亚人群的研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019 Jan;28(1):97-105. doi: 10.1002/pds.4683. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
7
Sunshine Policies and Murky Shadows in Europe: Disclosure of Pharmaceutical Industry Payments to Health Professionals in Nine European Countries.欧洲的阳光政策与阴暗面:九个欧洲国家向卫生专业人员披露制药业付款情况。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Jun 1;7(6):504-509. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.20.
8
Association of Pharmaceutical Industry Marketing of Opioid Products to Physicians With Subsequent Opioid Prescribing.制药行业向医生推销阿片类产品与随后的阿片类药物处方之间的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jun 1;178(6):861-863. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.1999.
9
Trends in opioid utilisation in Australia, 2006-2015: Insights from multiple metrics.2006 - 2015年澳大利亚阿片类药物使用趋势:多指标洞察
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018 May;27(5):504-512. doi: 10.1002/pds.4369. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
10
Industry Payments to Physicians for Opioid Products, 2013-2015.2013 - 2015年制药行业向医生支付的阿片类产品款项
Am J Public Health. 2017 Sep;107(9):1493-1495. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303982.