• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性疼痛对词语评价的影响。

Influence of acute pain on valence rating of words.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.

Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 18;16(3):e0248744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248744. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0248744
PMID:33735235
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7971552/
Abstract

Numerous studies showed the effect of negative affective and pain-related semantic primes enhancing the perceived intensity of successive painful stimuli. It remains unclear whether and how painful primes are able to influence semantic stimuli in a similar way. Therefore, we investigated the effects of noxious primes on the perception of the valence of subsequent semantic stimuli. In two experiments, 48 healthy subjects were asked to give their valence ratings regarding different semantic stimuli (pain-related, negative, positive, and neutral adjectives) after they were primed with noxious electrical stimuli of moderate intensity. Experiment 1 focused on the existence of the effect, experiment 2 focused on the length of the effect. Valence ratings of pain-related, negative, and positive words (not neutral words) became more negative after a painful electrical prime was applied in contrast to no prime. This effect was more pronounced for pain-related words compared to negative, pain-unrelated words. Furthermore, the priming effect continued to affect the valence ratings even some minutes after the painful priming had stopped. So, painful primes are influencing the perception of semantic stimuli as well as semantic primes are influencing the perception of painful stimuli.

摘要

许多研究表明,负性情感和与疼痛相关的语义启动会增强后续疼痛刺激的感知强度。目前尚不清楚疼痛启动是否以及如何以类似的方式影响语义刺激。因此,我们研究了有害启动对后续语义刺激的感知的影响。在两个实验中,48 名健康受试者在受到适度强度的有害电刺激启动后,被要求对不同的语义刺激(与疼痛相关、负性、正性和中性形容词)进行效价评定。实验 1 关注效应的存在,实验 2 关注效应的长度。与无启动相比,在应用疼痛性电刺激后,与疼痛相关、负性和正性词汇(而非中性词汇)的效价评定变得更加消极。与负性、与疼痛无关的词汇相比,与疼痛相关的词汇的启动效应更为明显。此外,即使在疼痛启动停止几分钟后,这种启动效应仍会继续影响效价评定。因此,疼痛启动不仅会影响语义刺激的感知,而且语义启动也会影响疼痛刺激的感知。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfa8/7971552/8da746bafbe1/pone.0248744.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfa8/7971552/78def7e1d4aa/pone.0248744.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfa8/7971552/9a72330bcc9c/pone.0248744.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfa8/7971552/59969a5725ff/pone.0248744.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfa8/7971552/974f610ab079/pone.0248744.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfa8/7971552/8da746bafbe1/pone.0248744.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfa8/7971552/78def7e1d4aa/pone.0248744.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfa8/7971552/9a72330bcc9c/pone.0248744.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfa8/7971552/59969a5725ff/pone.0248744.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfa8/7971552/974f610ab079/pone.0248744.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfa8/7971552/8da746bafbe1/pone.0248744.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Influence of acute pain on valence rating of words.急性疼痛对词语评价的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 18;16(3):e0248744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248744. eCollection 2021.
2
Pain-related and negative semantic priming enhances perceived pain intensity.疼痛相关的和消极的语义启动会增强感知到的疼痛强度。
Pain Res Manag. 2014 Mar-Apr;19(2):69-74. doi: 10.1155/2014/425321.
3
Neural correlates of word processing influenced by painful primes.疼痛启动词对文字处理的神经关联影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 19;19(1):e0295148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295148. eCollection 2024.
4
The influence of semantic priming on event-related potentials to painful laser-heat stimuli in humans.语义启动对人类痛觉激光热刺激相关事件电位的影响。
Neurosci Lett. 2000 Apr 21;284(1-2):53-6. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(00)00957-5.
5
The influence of semantic priming on event-related potentials to painful laser-heat stimuli in migraine patients.语义启动对偏头痛患者疼痛性激光热刺激相关事件电位的影响。
Neurosci Lett. 2003 Apr 10;340(2):135-8. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(03)00103-4.
6
How words impact on pain.文字对疼痛的影响。
Brain Behav. 2019 Sep;9(9):e01377. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1377. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
7
Some Words Hurt More Than Others: Semantic Activation of Pain Concepts in Memory and Subsequent Experiences of Pain.有些话语比其他话语更伤人:记忆中疼痛概念的语义激活及随后的疼痛体验
J Pain. 2016 Mar;17(3):336-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.11.004. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
8
Interference of spoken word recognition through phonological priming from visual objects and printed words.视觉物体和印刷文字的语音启动对口语单词识别的干扰。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Jan;76(1):190-200. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0560-8.
9
Semantic priming of different affective categories.不同情感类别的语义启动
Emotion. 2004 Dec;4(4):354-63. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.4.4.354.
10
Borderline Personality Disorder and Automatic Processing of Valence and Self-Other Relevance Information.边缘型人格障碍与效价及自我-他人相关性信息的自动加工
Psychopathology. 2016;49(2):116-23. doi: 10.1159/000445804. Epub 2016 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Are all negative words alike? Behavioral differences in processing negative words associated and not associated with physical and social pain.所有的否定词都一样吗?与身体疼痛和社会疼痛相关及不相关的否定词在处理过程中的行为差异。
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 30;15:1474945. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1474945. eCollection 2024.
2
Neural correlates of word processing influenced by painful primes.疼痛启动词对文字处理的神经关联影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 19;19(1):e0295148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295148. eCollection 2024.
3
Words hurt: common and distinct neural substrates underlying nociceptive and semantic pain.

本文引用的文献

1
Waves of prediction.一波又一波的预测。
PLoS Biol. 2019 Oct 3;17(10):e3000426. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000426. eCollection 2019 Oct.
2
How words impact on pain.文字对疼痛的影响。
Brain Behav. 2019 Sep;9(9):e01377. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1377. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
3
Behavioral Inhibition and Activation Systems, and Emotional Regulation in Individuals With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain.慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛个体的行为抑制与激活系统及情绪调节
言语伤人:伤害性疼痛和语义性疼痛背后的共同及不同神经基质
Front Neurosci. 2023 Sep 27;17:1234286. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1234286. eCollection 2023.
4
Incidental physical pain reduces brain activities associated with affective social feedback and increases aggression.偶然的身体疼痛会减少与情感社会反馈相关的大脑活动,并增加攻击性。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2023 Feb 23;18(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsac048.
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 10;9:394. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00394. eCollection 2018.
4
Neural Mechanisms With Respect to Different Paradigms and Relevant Regulatory Factors in Empathy for Pain.疼痛共情中不同范式及相关调节因素的神经机制
Front Neurosci. 2018 Jul 24;12:507. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00507. eCollection 2018.
5
Does predictive coding have a future?预测编码有未来吗?
Nat Neurosci. 2018 Aug;21(8):1019-1021. doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0200-7.
6
Deconstructing the sensation of pain: The influence of cognitive processes on pain perception.剖析疼痛感觉:认知过程对疼痛感知的影响。
Science. 2016 Nov 4;354(6312):584-587. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf8934.
7
Affective Norms for 4900 Polish Words Reload (ANPW_R): Assessments for Valence, Arousal, Dominance, Origin, Significance, Concreteness, Imageability and, Age of Acquisition.4900个波兰语单词情感规范再版(ANPW_R):效价、唤醒度、支配性、词源、重要性、具体性、可想象性及习得年龄的评估
Front Psychol. 2016 Jul 18;7:1081. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01081. eCollection 2016.
8
Rated age-of-acquisition norms for over 3,200 German words.3200多个德语单词的习得年龄常模。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Apr;49(2):484-501. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0718-0.
9
Norms of valence and arousal for 14,031 Spanish words.14031个西班牙语单词的效价和唤醒规范。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Feb;49(1):111-123. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0700-2.
10
Some Words Hurt More Than Others: Semantic Activation of Pain Concepts in Memory and Subsequent Experiences of Pain.有些话语比其他话语更伤人:记忆中疼痛概念的语义激活及随后的疼痛体验
J Pain. 2016 Mar;17(3):336-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.11.004. Epub 2015 Dec 8.