• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

格鲁吉亚补充和替代医学的监管环境-一项卫生政策分析。

Regulatory environment for complementary and alternative medicine in Georgia-a health policy analysis.

机构信息

David Tvildiani Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia.

Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

Int J Health Plann Manage. 2021 Jul;36(4):1038-1051. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3142. Epub 2021 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1002/hpm.3142
PMID:33735447
Abstract

International bodies such as the WHO call on member states to regulate and, where possible, integrate Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) into health systems, to the benefit and safety of patients. Research on CAM regulations in the Republic of Georgia has been limited. The aim of this study was to identify key actors and analyse the regulatory environment for CAM in Georgia in its local and international contexts. We conducted a health policy analysis using a triangle framework of content, context and processes. We used data from national government, professional associations and academia; and drew from primary qualitative data of stakeholders' perspectives and needs regarding CAM in Georgia. The several CAM associations we identified have limited capacities for self-regulation. CAM practices are currently not effectively regulated in Georgia, while the government has no expressed intention to develop regulatory frameworks. Georgia's CAM health policy is currently not compliant with WHO and European directives and recommendations. Government, lawmakers, public administration, academia, physicians, non-physician CAM practitioners and other actors should constitute a national working group dedicated to CAM regulations in Georgia to identify, classify CAM practices; and develop core principles for policy making for safe and effective CAM practiced in Georgia's health system.

摘要

国际组织,如世界卫生组织(WHO),呼吁成员国对补充和替代医学(CAM)进行监管,并在可能的情况下将其纳入卫生系统,以造福和保障患者的安全。然而,关于格鲁吉亚 CAM 监管的研究一直有限。本研究旨在确定关键行为者,并在地方和国际背景下分析格鲁吉亚的 CAM 监管环境。我们使用内容、背景和过程的三角框架进行了一项卫生政策分析。我们使用了来自国家政府、专业协会和学术界的数据,并借鉴了利益相关者对格鲁吉亚 CAM 的观点和需求的主要定性数据。我们确定的几个 CAM 协会自我监管能力有限。目前,格鲁吉亚没有有效地监管 CAM 实践,而政府也没有表示有意制定监管框架。格鲁吉亚的 CAM 卫生政策目前不符合世界卫生组织和欧洲指令及建议的要求。政府、立法者、公共行政部门、学术界、医生、非医师 CAM 从业者和其他行为者应组成一个国家工作组,专门负责格鲁吉亚的 CAM 监管,以确定、分类 CAM 实践,并为在格鲁吉亚卫生系统中安全有效地实施 CAM 制定核心政策原则。

相似文献

1
Regulatory environment for complementary and alternative medicine in Georgia-a health policy analysis.格鲁吉亚补充和替代医学的监管环境-一项卫生政策分析。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2021 Jul;36(4):1038-1051. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3142. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
2
Georgia's healthcare system and integration of complementary medicine.乔治亚州的医疗保健系统与补充医学的整合。
Complement Ther Med. 2019 Aug;45:205-210. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2019.06.016. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
3
COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE AND MEDICAL EDUCATION IN GEORGIA: STATE OF THE ART AND FURTHER PERSPECTIVES.格鲁吉亚的补充与替代医学及医学教育:现状与未来展望
Georgian Med News. 2017 Dec(273):118-122.
4
"Then I went to a hospital abroad": acknowledging implications of stakeholders' differing risk understandings related to use of complementary and alternative medicine in European health care contexts.“然后我去了国外的一家医院”:承认利益相关者对补充和替代医学在欧洲医疗保健背景下的使用有不同风险理解的影响。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2019 Apr 30;19(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12906-019-2499-3.
5
A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.补充和替代医学研究路线图——到2020年我们需要了解的内容。
Forsch Komplementmed. 2014;21(2):e1-16. doi: 10.1159/000360744. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
6
USE OF COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE IN GEORGIA.佐治亚州补充和替代医学的使用情况。
Georgian Med News. 2017 Nov(272):157-164.
7
Stakeholders' perspectives on the regulation and integration of complementary and alternative medicine products in Lebanon: a qualitative study.利益相关者对黎巴嫩补充和替代医学产品监管和整合的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2011 Aug 28;11:71. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-11-71.
8
Bridging cancer prevention efforts: Georgia's alignment with European code against cancer.弥合癌症预防工作差距:格鲁吉亚与欧洲抗癌守则接轨。
J Cancer Policy. 2024 Sep;41:100495. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2024.100495. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
9
How do participatory methods shape policy? Applying a realist approach to the formulation of a new tuberculosis policy in Georgia.参与式方法如何影响政策?在格鲁吉亚制定新的结核病政策过程中应用现实主义方法。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 29;11(6):e047948. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047948.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.