• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

砷和棕榈酸对人肝癌 HepG2 细胞氧化应激及脂质代谢紊乱的联合作用。

Combined effects of arsenic and palmitic acid on oxidative stress and lipid metabolism disorder in human hepatoma HepG2 cells.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of the Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, PR China.

Department of Environmental Science, School of Engineering, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 211198, PR China.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2021 May 15;769:144849. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144849. Epub 2021 Jan 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144849
PMID:33736254
Abstract

The toxicity of arsenic (As) can be influenced by many nutrients in food. However, the combined effects and underlying mechanisms of As and palmitic acid (PA) are still unclear. Here, cell viability, oxidative stress, lipids accumulation, gene expression profiles, and metabolome profiles of human hepatoma HepG2 cells exposed to As, PA, and As + PA were analyzed and compared. Results showed that co-exposure of 100 μM PA and 2 μM As induced lower cell viability, higher intracellular reactive oxygen species level, more lipid droplet accumulation, and more intracellular triglyceride contents than As alone or PA alone exposure. High-throughput quantitative PCR and H NMR-based metabolomics analysis showed that co-exposure of As and PA caused all toxic effects on gene expression and metabolome profiles induced by As alone or PA alone exposure, and showed higher toxicities. Gene expression profiles in the As + PA group had higher similarity with those in the As group than the PA group. However, PA played a more important role in metabolism disorder than As in their interactive effects. Oxidative stress and lipid metabolism disorder were found to be the main toxic effects in the As + PA group. Several differentially expressed genes (such as OXR1, OXSR1, INSR, and PPARA) and changed metabolites (such as pyruvate, acetate, and L-phenylalanine) were involved in the combined toxicity of As and PA. This study provides basic information on the interactive effects of As and PA, which is useful for the health risk assessment of As and FFA.

摘要

砷(As)的毒性可受食物中许多营养物质的影响。然而,As 和棕榈酸(PA)的联合作用及其潜在机制仍不清楚。本研究分析并比较了暴露于 As、PA 和 As + PA 的人肝癌 HepG2 细胞的细胞活力、氧化应激、脂质积累、基因表达谱和代谢组谱。结果表明,与单独暴露于 As 或 PA 相比,100 μM PA 和 2 μM As 的共暴露诱导较低的细胞活力、更高的细胞内活性氧水平、更多的脂滴积累和更高的细胞内甘油三酯含量。高通量定量 PCR 和基于 H NMR 的代谢组学分析表明,As 和 PA 的共暴露导致 As 或 PA 单独暴露引起的基因表达和代谢组谱的所有毒性作用,并表现出更高的毒性。As + PA 组的基因表达谱与 As 组的相似性高于 PA 组。然而,在它们的相互作用中,PA 在代谢紊乱方面比 As 发挥更重要的作用。氧化应激和脂质代谢紊乱被发现是 As + PA 组的主要毒性作用。一些差异表达基因(如 OXR1、OXSR1、INSR 和 PPARA)和代谢物(如丙酮酸、乙酸和 L-苯丙氨酸)参与了 As 和 PA 的联合毒性作用。本研究为 As 和 FFA 的健康风险评估提供了 As 和 PA 相互作用的基础信息。

相似文献

1
Combined effects of arsenic and palmitic acid on oxidative stress and lipid metabolism disorder in human hepatoma HepG2 cells.砷和棕榈酸对人肝癌 HepG2 细胞氧化应激及脂质代谢紊乱的联合作用。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 May 15;769:144849. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144849. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
2
Downregulation of sirtuin 3 by palmitic acid increases the oxidative stress, impairment of mitochondrial function, and apoptosis in liver cells.软脂酸通过下调 SIRT3 增加肝细胞的氧化应激、线粒体功能障碍和细胞凋亡。
J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2019 Aug;33(8):e22337. doi: 10.1002/jbt.22337. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
3
Influence of Iron on Cytotoxicity and Gene Expression Profiles Induced by Arsenic in HepG2 Cells.铁对 HepG2 细胞中砷诱导的细胞毒性和基因表达谱的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 14;16(22):4484. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224484.
4
Co-Exposure to SiO Nanoparticles and Arsenic Induced Augmentation of Oxidative Stress and Mitochondria-Dependent Apoptosis in Human Cells.二氧化硅纳米颗粒与砷共同暴露导致人细胞氧化应激和线粒体依赖性细胞凋亡加剧。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 1;16(17):3199. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173199.
5
Rosiglitazone ameliorates palmitic acid-induced cytotoxicity in TM4 Sertoli cells.罗格列酮可改善棕榈酸诱导的 TM4 支持细胞的细胞毒性。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018 Oct 17;16(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12958-018-0416-0.
6
Fermented Soymilk Alleviates Lipid Accumulation by Inhibition of SREBP-1 and Activation of NRF-2 in the Hepatocellular Steatosis Model.在肝细胞脂肪变性模型中,发酵豆浆通过抑制SREBP-1和激活NRF-2减轻脂质积累。
J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018 Feb 28;28(2):236-245. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1707.07061.
7
Mechanism Underlying -Coumaric Acid Alleviation of Lipid Accumulation in Palmitic Acid-Treated Human Hepatoma Cells.香豆酸缓解棕榈酸处理的人肝癌细胞脂质积累的作用机制。
J Agric Food Chem. 2020 Mar 25;68(12):3742-3749. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c00280. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
8
Multiple pathways are involved in palmitic acid-induced toxicity.多种途径参与了棕榈酸诱导的毒性作用。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2014 May;67:26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2014.01.027. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
9
Oleic acid ameliorates palmitic acid induced hepatocellular lipotoxicity by inhibition of ER stress and pyroptosis.油酸通过抑制内质网应激和细胞焦亡改善棕榈酸诱导的肝细胞脂肪毒性。
Nutr Metab (Lond). 2020 Jan 30;17:11. doi: 10.1186/s12986-020-0434-8. eCollection 2020.
10
Improvement of Lipid and Glucose Metabolism by Capsiate in Palmitic Acid-Treated HepG2 Cells via Activation of the AMPK/SIRT1 Signaling Pathway.辣椒素通过激活 AMPK/SIRT1 信号通路改善棕榈酸处理的 HepG2 细胞中的脂类和葡萄糖代谢。
J Agric Food Chem. 2018 Jul 5;66(26):6772-6781. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b01831. Epub 2018 Jun 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Fenofibrate Ameliorates Retinal Pigment Epithelium Injury Induced by Excessive Fat Through Upregulation of PI3K/AKT Signaling.非诺贝特通过上调 PI3K/AKT 信号改善过量脂肪诱导的视网膜色素上皮细胞损伤。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2023 Nov 21;17:3439-3452. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S420178. eCollection 2023.
2
The Expectation and Reality of the HepG2 Core Metabolic Profile.HepG2核心代谢谱的期望与现实
Metabolites. 2023 Aug 3;13(8):908. doi: 10.3390/metabo13080908.
3
Protective Effect of Isoorientin on Oleic Acid-Induced Oxidative Damage and Steatosis in Rat Liver Cells.
异荭草素对油酸诱导的大鼠肝细胞氧化损伤和脂肪变性的保护作用
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Feb 3;13:818159. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.818159. eCollection 2022.